Assessing the Effects of Interchange Warning Systems on Driving Risk: A Driving Simulator Study

IF 2 4区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Jingyang Li, Fengxiang Guo, Wei Li, Tianxiang Xiao, Chengyu Hu
{"title":"Assessing the Effects of Interchange Warning Systems on Driving Risk: A Driving Simulator Study","authors":"Jingyang Li,&nbsp;Fengxiang Guo,&nbsp;Wei Li,&nbsp;Tianxiang Xiao,&nbsp;Chengyu Hu","doi":"10.1155/2024/3582046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>To investigate the effects of proactive safety control systems suitable for highway interchanges and improve road traffic safety. Simulated driving experiments were conducted to test the effects of the interchange warning system (IWS) on the ramp, merging section, diverging section, and accident section. Random forest (RF) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) are used to analyze the effects between driving behavior and driving risk change in both situations without and with IWS. The results show that (1) as driving risk increases, drivers tend to increase the frequency of braking and engage in more comprehensive saccade behaviors. Concurrently, there is an increase in acceleration and speed variation, leading to a gradual decrease in speed. (2) Compared with the SVR and XGBoost, RF can better fit the nonlinear relationship between driving risk and driver behavior characteristics with the application of IWS. (3) The IWS mainly reduces driving risk by affecting operation behavior. When the mean speed, speed standard deviation (SD), acceleration SD, and maximum braking depth are at 40 to 70 km/h, 3 to 10 km/h, 0 to 0.6 m/s<sup>2</sup>, and 14 to 16, respectively, there is a significant reduction in driving risk. The application of the IWS expands the effective range of mean speed and speed SD for reducing driving risk to 40 to 100 km/h and 3 to 15 km/h, respectively.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Transportation","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/3582046","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/3582046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To investigate the effects of proactive safety control systems suitable for highway interchanges and improve road traffic safety. Simulated driving experiments were conducted to test the effects of the interchange warning system (IWS) on the ramp, merging section, diverging section, and accident section. Random forest (RF) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) are used to analyze the effects between driving behavior and driving risk change in both situations without and with IWS. The results show that (1) as driving risk increases, drivers tend to increase the frequency of braking and engage in more comprehensive saccade behaviors. Concurrently, there is an increase in acceleration and speed variation, leading to a gradual decrease in speed. (2) Compared with the SVR and XGBoost, RF can better fit the nonlinear relationship between driving risk and driver behavior characteristics with the application of IWS. (3) The IWS mainly reduces driving risk by affecting operation behavior. When the mean speed, speed standard deviation (SD), acceleration SD, and maximum braking depth are at 40 to 70 km/h, 3 to 10 km/h, 0 to 0.6 m/s2, and 14 to 16, respectively, there is a significant reduction in driving risk. The application of the IWS expands the effective range of mean speed and speed SD for reducing driving risk to 40 to 100 km/h and 3 to 15 km/h, respectively.

Abstract Image

评估互通式立交桥预警系统对驾驶风险的影响:模拟驾驶研究
研究适用于高速公路互通立交的主动安全控制系统的效果,提高道路交通安全。通过模拟驾驶实验,测试互通式立交预警系统(IWS)对匝道、合流段、分流段和事故段的影响。使用随机森林(RF)和SHAPLEY Additive exPlanations(SHAP)分析了在无互通式预警系统和有互通式预警系统两种情况下驾驶行为和驾驶风险变化之间的影响。结果表明:(1) 随着驾驶风险的增加,驾驶员倾向于增加制动频率并采取更全面的囊状动作。同时,加速和速度变化增加,导致速度逐渐下降。(2)与 SVR 和 XGBoost 相比,应用 IWS 后,RF 能更好地拟合驾驶风险与驾驶员行为特征之间的非线性关系。(3)IWS 主要通过影响操作行为来降低驾驶风险。当平均速度、速度标准差(SD)、加速度标准差和最大制动深度分别为 40 至 70 km/h、3 至 10 km/h、0 至 0.6 m/s2 和 14 至 16 时,驾驶风险显著降低。采用综合安全系统后,可降低驾驶风险的平均速度和速度标定值的有效范围分别扩大到 40 至 100 公里/小时和 3 至 15 公里/小时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Transportation
Journal of Advanced Transportation 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
8.70%
发文量
466
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Transportation (JAT) is a fully peer reviewed international journal in transportation research areas related to public transit, road traffic, transport networks and air transport. It publishes theoretical and innovative papers on analysis, design, operations, optimization and planning of multi-modal transport networks, transit & traffic systems, transport technology and traffic safety. Urban rail and bus systems, Pedestrian studies, traffic flow theory and control, Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) and automated and/or connected vehicles are some topics of interest. Highway engineering, railway engineering and logistics do not fall within the aims and scope of JAT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信