A measure for seismic multiple bends and shear damage patterns of RC rigid-frame bridge tall piers

IF 3.8 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Zhu Mei, Yang Liu, Bin Wu, Oreste S. Bursi, Da-gang Lu, Fabrizio Paolacci
{"title":"A measure for seismic multiple bends and shear damage patterns of RC rigid-frame bridge tall piers","authors":"Zhu Mei,&nbsp;Yang Liu,&nbsp;Bin Wu,&nbsp;Oreste S. Bursi,&nbsp;Da-gang Lu,&nbsp;Fabrizio Paolacci","doi":"10.1007/s10518-024-01914-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Reinforced concrete (RC) rigid-frame bridges with tall hollow piers were widely constructed in Southwestern China, an earthquake-prone area. For such bridges, the seismic damages may be underestimated if multiple bends of tall piers are overlooked using a conventional damage measure such as the drift ratio. Moreover, the seismic damage assessment can be inaccurate if tall piers’ shear damages are ignored using the sectional curvature as a damage measure. Along these lines, this paper proposes a novel seismic damage measure, the piecewise drift ratio (PDR), involving both shear effects and multiple-bend deformations; it has been validated by hybrid tests and analyzed employing fragility curves. Damage state limits represented by the PDR are estimated through statistical analysis of the 40 existing tests of hollow piers. To validate the PDR, a finite element model of an RC rigid-frame bridge with two tall piers was established and adequately calibrated based on model-updating hybrid simulations. To comprehensively evaluate the PDR, ground motions were selected and grouped into four categories by identifying their first two-class nature frequency and their amplitude ratio; to determine fragility curves, both the spectral acceleration at the fundamental period with 5% damping, <i>S</i><sub>a</sub>(<i>T</i><sub>1</sub>, 5%), and the peak ground acceleration have been adopted as intensity measures. Results show the effectiveness of the proposed PDR, provide a more severe ground motion for assessment, and reveal the high exceedance probability of the complete damage state of tall piers under some potential seismic scenarios.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"22 9","pages":"4609 - 4633"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-024-01914-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reinforced concrete (RC) rigid-frame bridges with tall hollow piers were widely constructed in Southwestern China, an earthquake-prone area. For such bridges, the seismic damages may be underestimated if multiple bends of tall piers are overlooked using a conventional damage measure such as the drift ratio. Moreover, the seismic damage assessment can be inaccurate if tall piers’ shear damages are ignored using the sectional curvature as a damage measure. Along these lines, this paper proposes a novel seismic damage measure, the piecewise drift ratio (PDR), involving both shear effects and multiple-bend deformations; it has been validated by hybrid tests and analyzed employing fragility curves. Damage state limits represented by the PDR are estimated through statistical analysis of the 40 existing tests of hollow piers. To validate the PDR, a finite element model of an RC rigid-frame bridge with two tall piers was established and adequately calibrated based on model-updating hybrid simulations. To comprehensively evaluate the PDR, ground motions were selected and grouped into four categories by identifying their first two-class nature frequency and their amplitude ratio; to determine fragility curves, both the spectral acceleration at the fundamental period with 5% damping, Sa(T1, 5%), and the peak ground acceleration have been adopted as intensity measures. Results show the effectiveness of the proposed PDR, provide a more severe ground motion for assessment, and reveal the high exceedance probability of the complete damage state of tall piers under some potential seismic scenarios.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

钢筋混凝土刚架桥高墩地震多弯和剪切破坏模式的测量方法
中国西南地区是地震多发区,该地区广泛建造了带有高大空心墩的钢筋混凝土(RC)刚架桥。对于此类桥梁,如果使用漂移率等传统破坏测量方法忽略了高墩的多个弯曲,则可能会低估地震破坏。此外,如果使用断面曲率作为破坏度量,忽略了高墩的剪切破坏,地震破坏评估也可能不准确。因此,本文提出了一种新的地震破坏测量方法--分段漂移比(PDR),它同时涉及剪切效应和多弯变形;该方法已通过混合试验进行了验证,并采用脆性曲线进行了分析。通过对现有的 40 个空心墩试验进行统计分析,估算出了 PDR 所代表的破坏状态极限。为了验证 PDR,我们建立了带有两个高墩的 RC 刚架桥有限元模型,并根据模型更新混合模拟进行了充分校准。为全面评估 PDR,选择了地面运动,并通过确定其一二类性质频率和振幅比将其分为四类;为确定脆性曲线,采用了阻尼为 5%、基期频谱加速度 Sa(T1, 5%) 和峰值地面加速度作为强度度量。结果表明了所建议的 PDR 的有效性,为评估提供了更严重的地面运动,并揭示了高墩在某些潜在地震情况下完全破坏状态的高超限概率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信