The Distribution Pattern of Ground Movement and Co-Seismic Landslides: A Case Study of the 5 September 2022 Luding Earthquake, China

IF 3.5 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
W. P. Li, Y. M. Wu, X. Gao, W. M. Wang, Z. H. Yang, H. J. Liu
{"title":"The Distribution Pattern of Ground Movement and Co-Seismic Landslides: A Case Study of the 5 September 2022 Luding Earthquake, China","authors":"W. P. Li,&nbsp;Y. M. Wu,&nbsp;X. Gao,&nbsp;W. M. Wang,&nbsp;Z. H. Yang,&nbsp;H. J. Liu","doi":"10.1029/2023JF007534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Major earthquakes can cause extensive landsliding that poses a major threat to both property and human lives. In addition to co-seismically triggered ground failure, the earthquake-affected region remains vulnerable to landslides due to loosened and unstable materials and structures. Many researchers have studied landslide distributions and their controlling factors after earthquakes, but the function of ground motion is unclear. To investigate the connection in a strike-slip earthquake, we analyzed the 5 September 2022 Luding earthquake (<i>M</i><sub><i>w</i></sub> 6.6) in Sichuan Province, China. We interpreted remote-sensing images to obtain the landslide distribution before and after the earthquake, calculated surface deformation from D-InSAR data (pre- and post-earthquake), utilized a point-source model for the focal mechanism inversion, and then constructed a finite fault model for the rupture slip. There are clear differences in the landslide distributions on the two sides of the fault before and after the earthquake. The density of co-seismic landslides on the west side of the fault exceeded that on the east side. The patterns of surface deformation and ground motion indicated that the areas with larger deformation and motion were associated with more landslides. Furthermore, the landslide size decreased with distance from the fault. A new finding is that co-seismic landslides induced by strike-slip earthquakes result in high landslide concentration on both sides of the fault, while previous studies find that co-seismic landslides triggered by thrust earthquakes present a hanging wall concentrated distribution pattern. These findings contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the connection between ground movement patterns and landslide distributions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface","volume":"129 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023JF007534","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Major earthquakes can cause extensive landsliding that poses a major threat to both property and human lives. In addition to co-seismically triggered ground failure, the earthquake-affected region remains vulnerable to landslides due to loosened and unstable materials and structures. Many researchers have studied landslide distributions and their controlling factors after earthquakes, but the function of ground motion is unclear. To investigate the connection in a strike-slip earthquake, we analyzed the 5 September 2022 Luding earthquake (Mw 6.6) in Sichuan Province, China. We interpreted remote-sensing images to obtain the landslide distribution before and after the earthquake, calculated surface deformation from D-InSAR data (pre- and post-earthquake), utilized a point-source model for the focal mechanism inversion, and then constructed a finite fault model for the rupture slip. There are clear differences in the landslide distributions on the two sides of the fault before and after the earthquake. The density of co-seismic landslides on the west side of the fault exceeded that on the east side. The patterns of surface deformation and ground motion indicated that the areas with larger deformation and motion were associated with more landslides. Furthermore, the landslide size decreased with distance from the fault. A new finding is that co-seismic landslides induced by strike-slip earthquakes result in high landslide concentration on both sides of the fault, while previous studies find that co-seismic landslides triggered by thrust earthquakes present a hanging wall concentrated distribution pattern. These findings contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the connection between ground movement patterns and landslide distributions.

地动与共震滑坡的分布模式:中国 2022 年 9 月 5 日泸定地震案例研究
大地震会造成大面积山体滑坡,对财产和生命构成重大威胁。除了共震引发的地面破坏之外,受地震影响的地区仍然很容易因松动和不稳定的材料和结构而发生山体滑坡。许多研究人员对地震后的滑坡分布及其控制因素进行了研究,但对地面运动的作用尚不清楚。为了研究击滑地震中的关联,我们分析了中国四川省 2022 年 9 月 5 日发生的泸定地震(震级 6.6 级)。我们对遥感图像进行了判读,以获得地震前后的滑坡分布情况;利用 D-InSAR 数据计算了地表变形(震前和震后);利用点源模型对焦点机制进行了反演;然后构建了有限断层模型来计算破裂滑移。地震前后断层两侧的滑坡分布存在明显差异。断层西侧的同震滑坡密度超过了断层东侧。地表变形和地面运动模式表明,变形和运动较大的区域有较多的滑坡。此外,山体滑坡的规模随着与断层距离的增加而减小。一个新发现是,走向滑动地震引发的共震滑坡在断层两侧高度集中,而之前的研究发现,推力地震引发的共震滑坡呈现悬壁集中分布模式。这些发现有助于更全面地了解地动模式与滑坡分布之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface
Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth-Surface Processes
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
10.30%
发文量
162
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信