Comparison of Bioinspired Techniques for Tracking Maximum Power under Variable Environmental Conditions

IF 5 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Dilip Yadav, Nidhi Singh, Nimay Chandra Giri, Vikas Singh Bhadoria, Subrata Kumar Sarker
{"title":"Comparison of Bioinspired Techniques for Tracking Maximum Power under Variable Environmental Conditions","authors":"Dilip Yadav,&nbsp;Nidhi Singh,&nbsp;Nimay Chandra Giri,&nbsp;Vikas Singh Bhadoria,&nbsp;Subrata Kumar Sarker","doi":"10.1155/2024/6678384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper presents a comparative analysis of bioinspired algorithms employed on a PV system subject to standard conditions, under step-change of irradiance conditions, and a partial shading condition for tracking the global maximum power point (GMPP). Four performance analysis and comparison techniques are artificial bee colony, particle swarm optimization, genetic algorithm, and a new metaheuristic technique called jellyfish optimization, respectively. These existing algorithms are well-known for tracking the GMPP with high efficiency. This paper compares these algorithms based on extracting GMPP in terms of maximum power from a PV module running at a uniform (STC), nonuniform solar irradiation (under step-change of irradiance), and partial shading conditions (PSCs). For analysis and comparison, two modules are taken: 1Soltech-1STH-215P and SolarWorld Industries GmbH Sunmodule plus SW 245 poly module, which are considered to form a panel by connecting four series modules. Comparison is based on maximum power tracking, total execution time, and minimum number of iterations to achieve the GMPP with high tracking efficiency and minimum error. Minitab software finds the regression equation (objective function) for STC, step-changing irradiation, and PSC. The reliability of the data (P-V curves) was measured in terms of <i>p</i> value, <i>R</i>, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup>, and VIF. The <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> value comes out to be near 1, which shows the accuracy of the data. The simulation results prove that the new evolutionary jellyfish optimization technique gives better results in terms of higher tracking efficiency with very less time to obtain GMPP in all environmental conditions, with a higher efficiency of 98 to 99.9% with less time of 0.0386 to 0.1219 sec in comparison to ABC, GA, and PSO. The RMSE value for the proposed method JFO (0.59) is much lower than that of ABC, GA, and PSO.</p>","PeriodicalId":14089,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intelligent Systems","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intelligent Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/6678384","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of bioinspired algorithms employed on a PV system subject to standard conditions, under step-change of irradiance conditions, and a partial shading condition for tracking the global maximum power point (GMPP). Four performance analysis and comparison techniques are artificial bee colony, particle swarm optimization, genetic algorithm, and a new metaheuristic technique called jellyfish optimization, respectively. These existing algorithms are well-known for tracking the GMPP with high efficiency. This paper compares these algorithms based on extracting GMPP in terms of maximum power from a PV module running at a uniform (STC), nonuniform solar irradiation (under step-change of irradiance), and partial shading conditions (PSCs). For analysis and comparison, two modules are taken: 1Soltech-1STH-215P and SolarWorld Industries GmbH Sunmodule plus SW 245 poly module, which are considered to form a panel by connecting four series modules. Comparison is based on maximum power tracking, total execution time, and minimum number of iterations to achieve the GMPP with high tracking efficiency and minimum error. Minitab software finds the regression equation (objective function) for STC, step-changing irradiation, and PSC. The reliability of the data (P-V curves) was measured in terms of p value, R, R2, and VIF. The R2 value comes out to be near 1, which shows the accuracy of the data. The simulation results prove that the new evolutionary jellyfish optimization technique gives better results in terms of higher tracking efficiency with very less time to obtain GMPP in all environmental conditions, with a higher efficiency of 98 to 99.9% with less time of 0.0386 to 0.1219 sec in comparison to ABC, GA, and PSO. The RMSE value for the proposed method JFO (0.59) is much lower than that of ABC, GA, and PSO.

生物启发技术在多变环境条件下跟踪最大功率的比较
本文比较分析了在标准条件下、辐照度阶跃变化条件下和部分遮挡条件下采用生物启发算法跟踪全局最大功率点(GMPP)的光伏系统。四种性能分析和比较技术分别是人工蜂群、粒子群优化、遗传算法和一种名为水母优化的新元启发式技术。这些现有算法在高效跟踪 GMPP 方面都很有名。本文对这些算法进行了比较,这些算法基于从在均匀(STC)、非均匀太阳辐照(辐照阶跃变化下)和部分遮阳条件(PSCs)下运行的光伏组件中提取最大功率的 GMPP。为了进行分析和比较,我们选取了两个模块:1Soltech-1STH-215P 和 SolarWorld Industries GmbH Sunmodule plus SW 245 poly 模块,通过连接四个串联模块组成一个面板。比较基于最大功率跟踪、总执行时间和最小迭代次数,以实现具有高跟踪效率和最小误差的 GMPP。Minitab 软件找出了 STC、阶跃变化辐照度和 PSC 的回归方程(目标函数)。用 p 值、R、R2 和 VIF 来衡量数据(P-V 曲线)的可靠性。R2 值接近 1,这表明了数据的准确性。仿真结果证明,与 ABC、GA 和 PSO 相比,新的水母进化优化技术在所有环境条件下都能以更短的时间获得更高的跟踪效率,并以更低的时间(0.0386 至 0.1219 秒)获得更高的跟踪效率(98% 至 99.9%)。拟议方法 JFO 的 RMSE 值(0.59)远低于 ABC、GA 和 PSO。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Intelligent Systems
International Journal of Intelligent Systems 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
304
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Intelligent Systems serves as a forum for individuals interested in tapping into the vast theories based on intelligent systems construction. With its peer-reviewed format, the journal explores several fascinating editorials written by today''s experts in the field. Because new developments are being introduced each day, there''s much to be learned — examination, analysis creation, information retrieval, man–computer interactions, and more. The International Journal of Intelligent Systems uses charts and illustrations to demonstrate these ground-breaking issues, and encourages readers to share their thoughts and experiences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信