Effect of grinding or rolling fava beans on feed intake and milk production in Holstein cows

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Trinidad de Evan Rozada , Marianne Johansen , Martin R. Weisbjerg , Mogens Larsen
{"title":"Effect of grinding or rolling fava beans on feed intake and milk production in Holstein cows","authors":"Trinidad de Evan Rozada ,&nbsp;Marianne Johansen ,&nbsp;Martin R. Weisbjerg ,&nbsp;Mogens Larsen","doi":"10.1016/j.livsci.2024.105493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The objective of the present study was to evaluate the performance of primi- and multiparous dairy cows fed diets with ground or rolled fava beans (FB). A total of 96 Danish Holstein cows (48 primi- and 48 multiparous) were used in a randomized block design lasting 4 weeks. Within parity group, cows were blocked according to their milk yield in 6 blocks with 8 cows each and two cows from each block were distributed in pens where they were assigned randomly one of the two experimental diets. The diets were based on a total mix ration (TMR) composed of 52.6 % forage and 47.4 % concentrate (DM basis), differing only in the particle size of FB (geometric mean diameters of 1.02 and 3.52 mm for ground and rolled FB, respectively). Feed intake, milk production, and milk composition were determined during the last 8 days of the experimental period; none of these differed between treatments except for a higher (<em>P</em> = 0.01) milk N efficiency (% of N intake) and milk urea content with ground FB compared with rolled FB. Additionally, feces and ruminal fluid were collected from a group of 24 multiparous cows to determine fecal starch content and ruminal volatile fatty acids (VFAs). The fecal starch concentration was greater with rolled FB showing a reduced starch digestion, whereas ruminal VFA proportions generally did not differ between treatments. In conclusion, the lactation performance of dairy cows appeared not to be affected by grinding or rolling of FB with a 20 % FB inclusion in the DM diet, even though total tract starch digestion was reduced with greater FB particle size.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18152,"journal":{"name":"Livestock Science","volume":"285 ","pages":"Article 105493"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871141324001008/pdfft?md5=4af514576219349743db855d455c7779&pid=1-s2.0-S1871141324001008-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Livestock Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871141324001008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the performance of primi- and multiparous dairy cows fed diets with ground or rolled fava beans (FB). A total of 96 Danish Holstein cows (48 primi- and 48 multiparous) were used in a randomized block design lasting 4 weeks. Within parity group, cows were blocked according to their milk yield in 6 blocks with 8 cows each and two cows from each block were distributed in pens where they were assigned randomly one of the two experimental diets. The diets were based on a total mix ration (TMR) composed of 52.6 % forage and 47.4 % concentrate (DM basis), differing only in the particle size of FB (geometric mean diameters of 1.02 and 3.52 mm for ground and rolled FB, respectively). Feed intake, milk production, and milk composition were determined during the last 8 days of the experimental period; none of these differed between treatments except for a higher (P = 0.01) milk N efficiency (% of N intake) and milk urea content with ground FB compared with rolled FB. Additionally, feces and ruminal fluid were collected from a group of 24 multiparous cows to determine fecal starch content and ruminal volatile fatty acids (VFAs). The fecal starch concentration was greater with rolled FB showing a reduced starch digestion, whereas ruminal VFA proportions generally did not differ between treatments. In conclusion, the lactation performance of dairy cows appeared not to be affected by grinding or rolling of FB with a 20 % FB inclusion in the DM diet, even though total tract starch digestion was reduced with greater FB particle size.

磨碎或轧碎蚕豆对荷斯坦奶牛采食量和产奶量的影响
本研究的目的是评估初产奶牛和多产奶牛饲喂含有磨碎或轧碎蚕豆(FB)的日粮的生产性能。在为期 4 周的随机区组设计中,共使用了 96 头丹麦荷斯坦奶牛(初产妇 48 头,多产妇 48 头)。在同一胎次组中,奶牛根据产奶量被分到 6 个区,每个区 8 头奶牛,每个区的两头奶牛被分到围栏中,随机分配两种试验日粮中的一种。两种日粮的基础是由 52.6% 的饲料和 47.4% 的精料(DM 基础)组成的全混合日粮(TMR),两者的区别仅在于饲料添加剂的颗粒大小不同(磨碎的和轧制的饲料添加剂的几何平均直径分别为 1.02 毫米和 3.52 毫米)。在实验期的最后 8 天测定了饲料摄入量、产奶量和牛奶成分;除了磨碎的 FB 的牛奶氮效率(氮摄入量的百分比)和牛奶尿素含量比碾碎的 FB 高(P = 0.01)外,其他处理之间均无差异。此外,还收集了一组 24 头多胎奶牛的粪便和瘤胃液,以测定粪便中的淀粉含量和瘤胃挥发性脂肪酸 (VFA)。粪便中淀粉浓度较高,而轧制 FB 表明淀粉消化率较低,而瘤胃挥发性脂肪酸比例在不同处理之间一般没有差异。总之,在DM日粮中添加20%的FB时,奶牛的泌乳性能似乎不会受到磨碎或轧碎FB的影响,尽管FB粒度越大,奶牛总淀粉消化率越低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Livestock Science
Livestock Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
237
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Livestock Science promotes the sound development of the livestock sector by publishing original, peer-reviewed research and review articles covering all aspects of this broad field. The journal welcomes submissions on the avant-garde areas of animal genetics, breeding, growth, reproduction, nutrition, physiology, and behaviour in addition to genetic resources, welfare, ethics, health, management and production systems. The high-quality content of this journal reflects the truly international nature of this broad area of research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信