Reliable Long-Term Serial Evaluation of Cochlear Function Using Pulsed Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emissions: Analyzing Levels and Pressure Time Courses.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Ear and Hearing Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-29 DOI:10.1097/AUD.0000000000001522
Katharina Bader, Ernst Dalhoff, Linda Dierkes, Lore Helene Braun, Anthony W Gummer, Dennis Zelle
{"title":"Reliable Long-Term Serial Evaluation of Cochlear Function Using Pulsed Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emissions: Analyzing Levels and Pressure Time Courses.","authors":"Katharina Bader, Ernst Dalhoff, Linda Dierkes, Lore Helene Braun, Anthony W Gummer, Dennis Zelle","doi":"10.1097/AUD.0000000000001522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To date, there is no international standard on how to use distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) in serial measurements to accurately detect changes in the function of the cochlear amplifier due, for example, to ototoxic therapies, occupational noise, or the development of regenerative therapies. The use of clinically established standard DPOAE protocols for serial monitoring programs appears to be hampered by multiple factors, including probe placement and calibration effects, signal-processing complexities associated with multiple sites of emission generation as well as suboptimal selection of stimulus parameters.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Pulsed DPOAEs were measured seven times within 3 months for f2 = 1 to 14 kHz and L2 = 25 to 80 dB SPL in 20 ears of 10 healthy participants with normal hearing (mean age = 32.1 ± 9.7 years). L1 values were computed from individual optimal-path parameters derived from the corresponding individual DPOAE level map in the first test session. Three different DPOAE metrics for evaluating the functional state of the cochlear amplifier were investigated with respect to their test-retest reliability: (1) the interference-free, nonlinear-distortion component level ( LOD ), (2) the time course of the DPOAE-envelope levels, LDP ( t ), and (3) the squared, zero-lag correlation coefficient ( ) between the time courses of the DPOAE-envelope pressures, pDP ( t ), measured in two sessions. The latter two metrics include the two main DPOAE components and their state of interference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Collated over all sessions and frequencies, the median absolute difference for LOD was 1.93 dB and for LDP ( t ) was 2.52 dB; the median of was 0.988. For the low ( f2 = 1 to 3 kHz), mid ( f2 = 4 to 9 kHz), and high ( f2 = 10 to 14 kHz) frequency ranges, the test-retest reliability of LOD increased with increasing signal to noise ratio (SNR).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>On the basis of the knowledge gained from this study on the test-retest reliability of pulsed DPOAE signals and the current literature, we propose a DPOAE protocol for future serial monitoring applications that takes into account the following factors: (1) separation of DPOAE components, (2) use of individually optimal stimulus parameters, (3) SNR of at least 15 dB, (4) accurate pressure calibration, (5) consideration of frequency- and level-dependent test-retest reliabilities and corresponding reference ranges, and (6) stimulus levels L2 that are as low as possible with sufficient SNR to capture the nonlinear functional state of the cochlear amplifier operating at its highest gain.</p>","PeriodicalId":55172,"journal":{"name":"Ear and Hearing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11325968/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ear and Hearing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001522","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To date, there is no international standard on how to use distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) in serial measurements to accurately detect changes in the function of the cochlear amplifier due, for example, to ototoxic therapies, occupational noise, or the development of regenerative therapies. The use of clinically established standard DPOAE protocols for serial monitoring programs appears to be hampered by multiple factors, including probe placement and calibration effects, signal-processing complexities associated with multiple sites of emission generation as well as suboptimal selection of stimulus parameters.

Design: Pulsed DPOAEs were measured seven times within 3 months for f2 = 1 to 14 kHz and L2 = 25 to 80 dB SPL in 20 ears of 10 healthy participants with normal hearing (mean age = 32.1 ± 9.7 years). L1 values were computed from individual optimal-path parameters derived from the corresponding individual DPOAE level map in the first test session. Three different DPOAE metrics for evaluating the functional state of the cochlear amplifier were investigated with respect to their test-retest reliability: (1) the interference-free, nonlinear-distortion component level ( LOD ), (2) the time course of the DPOAE-envelope levels, LDP ( t ), and (3) the squared, zero-lag correlation coefficient ( ) between the time courses of the DPOAE-envelope pressures, pDP ( t ), measured in two sessions. The latter two metrics include the two main DPOAE components and their state of interference.

Results: Collated over all sessions and frequencies, the median absolute difference for LOD was 1.93 dB and for LDP ( t ) was 2.52 dB; the median of was 0.988. For the low ( f2 = 1 to 3 kHz), mid ( f2 = 4 to 9 kHz), and high ( f2 = 10 to 14 kHz) frequency ranges, the test-retest reliability of LOD increased with increasing signal to noise ratio (SNR).

Conclusions: On the basis of the knowledge gained from this study on the test-retest reliability of pulsed DPOAE signals and the current literature, we propose a DPOAE protocol for future serial monitoring applications that takes into account the following factors: (1) separation of DPOAE components, (2) use of individually optimal stimulus parameters, (3) SNR of at least 15 dB, (4) accurate pressure calibration, (5) consideration of frequency- and level-dependent test-retest reliabilities and corresponding reference ranges, and (6) stimulus levels L2 that are as low as possible with sufficient SNR to capture the nonlinear functional state of the cochlear amplifier operating at its highest gain.

使用脉冲畸变产物耳声发射对耳蜗功能进行可靠的长期序列评估:分析水平和压力时程。
目标:迄今为止,关于如何在序列测量中使用畸变产物耳声发射(DPOAE)来准确检测耳蜗放大器功能的变化(例如,耳毒性疗法、职业噪声或再生疗法的发展),尚无国际标准。临床上已确立的标准 DPOAE 方案在系列监测项目中的使用似乎受到多种因素的阻碍,包括探头放置和校准效应、与多个发射点相关的信号处理复杂性以及刺激参数的次优选择:设计:在 3 个月内对 10 名听力正常的健康参与者(平均年龄为 32.1 ± 9.7 岁)的 20 只耳朵进行了 7 次脉冲 DPOAE 测量,测量频率为 f2 = 1 至 14 kHz,L2 = 25 至 80 dB SPL。L1 值是根据第一次测试中相应的个人 DPOAE 水平图得出的个人最佳路径参数计算得出的。研究了用于评估耳蜗放大器功能状态的三种不同的 DPOAE 指标的测试再测可靠性:(1) 无干扰、非线性失真分量水平 (LOD),(2) DPOAE 包络水平的时间历程 LDP(t),(3) 在两次测试中测得的 DPOAE 包络压力时间历程 pDP(t) 之间的平方零滞后相关系数 ()。后两个指标包括两个主要的 DPOAE 成分及其干扰状态:综合所有时段和频率,LOD 的绝对差值中位数为 1.93 dB,LDP(t) 的绝对差值中位数为 2.52 dB,中位数为 0.988。在低频(f2 = 1 至 3 kHz)、中频(f2 = 4 至 9 kHz)和高频(f2 = 10 至 14 kHz)范围内,LOD 的重复测试可靠性随着信噪比(SNR)的增加而增加:根据本研究对脉冲 DPOAE 信号测试再测可靠性的了解以及现有文献,我们提出了一种 DPOAE 协议,用于未来的序列监测应用,该协议考虑了以下因素:(1) 分离 DPOAE 成分;(2) 使用单独的最佳刺激参数;(3) SNR 至少为 15 dB;(4) 精确的压力校准;(5) 考虑与频率和电平相关的测试再测可靠性和相应的参考范围;(6) 刺激电平 L2 尽可能低,并具有足够的 SNR 以捕捉耳蜗放大器在最高增益下工作的非线性功能状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ear and Hearing
Ear and Hearing 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: From the basic science of hearing and balance disorders to auditory electrophysiology to amplification and the psychological factors of hearing loss, Ear and Hearing covers all aspects of auditory and vestibular disorders. This multidisciplinary journal consolidates the various factors that contribute to identification, remediation, and audiologic and vestibular rehabilitation. It is the one journal that serves the diverse interest of all members of this professional community -- otologists, audiologists, educators, and to those involved in the design, manufacture, and distribution of amplification systems. The original articles published in the journal focus on assessment, diagnosis, and management of auditory and vestibular disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信