Improving survival in metastatic colorectal cancer through optimized patient selection.

IF 1.1 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Tanios S Bekaii-Saab, Afsaneh Barzi, Mike Cusnir
{"title":"Improving survival in metastatic colorectal cancer through optimized patient selection.","authors":"Tanios S Bekaii-Saab, Afsaneh Barzi, Mike Cusnir","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The systemic treatment options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer have recently expanded with the US Food and Drug Administration approval of fruquintinib being added to previously approved trifluridine/tipiracil with or without bevacizumab and regorafenib. These therapies are recommended for use based on the initial clinical trials that focused on their safety and efficacy in extending overall survival of patients with refractory metastatic disease, as well as later studies, including the ReDOS study that confirmed the dose-escalation strategy of regorafenib to be key in optimizing duration of therapy and preventing side effects. Although more research is needed on how to sequence third-line therapies, data from real-world studies showed that switching from regorafenib to trifluridine/tipiracil with or without bevacizumab allowed patients to have a chemotherapy-free break and led to improved survival, suggesting that there may be a benefit for using regorafenib first. Current treatment guidelines state that each therapy can be given before or after the others. Generally, sequencing considerations in the refractory setting include multiple variables such as tumor characteristics, toxicities, factors that are important to the patient, response to prior lines of therapy, and extent of disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":51585,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Advances in Hematology & Oncology","volume":"22 Suppl 4 5","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Advances in Hematology & Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The systemic treatment options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer have recently expanded with the US Food and Drug Administration approval of fruquintinib being added to previously approved trifluridine/tipiracil with or without bevacizumab and regorafenib. These therapies are recommended for use based on the initial clinical trials that focused on their safety and efficacy in extending overall survival of patients with refractory metastatic disease, as well as later studies, including the ReDOS study that confirmed the dose-escalation strategy of regorafenib to be key in optimizing duration of therapy and preventing side effects. Although more research is needed on how to sequence third-line therapies, data from real-world studies showed that switching from regorafenib to trifluridine/tipiracil with or without bevacizumab allowed patients to have a chemotherapy-free break and led to improved survival, suggesting that there may be a benefit for using regorafenib first. Current treatment guidelines state that each therapy can be given before or after the others. Generally, sequencing considerations in the refractory setting include multiple variables such as tumor characteristics, toxicities, factors that are important to the patient, response to prior lines of therapy, and extent of disease.

通过优化患者选择提高转移性结直肠癌患者的生存率。
最近,美国食品和药物管理局批准在以前批准的曲氟啶/替吡拉西与或不与贝伐珠单抗和瑞戈非尼的基础上,增加使用 fruquintinib,从而扩大了转移性结直肠癌患者的全身治疗选择。推荐使用这些疗法的依据是最初的临床试验,这些试验的重点是它们在延长难治性转移性疾病患者总生存期方面的安全性和有效性,以及后来的研究,包括 ReDOS 研究,该研究证实瑞戈非尼的剂量递增策略是优化疗程和预防副作用的关键。虽然如何安排三线疗法的顺序还需要更多的研究,但真实世界的研究数据显示,从瑞戈非尼换成曲氟尿苷/替吡拉西与或不与贝伐珠单抗,可以让患者有一个无化疗的间歇期,并能提高生存率,这表明首先使用瑞戈非尼可能有好处。目前的治疗指南规定,每种疗法可以在其他疗法之前或之后进行。一般来说,难治性治疗的排序考虑因素包括多种变量,如肿瘤特征、毒性、对患者重要的因素、对前几种疗法的反应以及疾病的程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: Clinical Advances in Hematology & Oncology (CAH&O) is a monthly peer-reviewed journal reaching more than 27,000 hematology and oncology clinicians. CAH&O provides editorial content encompassing a wide array of topics relevant and useful to the fields of oncology and hematology, both separately and together. Content is directed by the strong input of today’s top thought leaders in hematology & oncology, including feature-length review articles, monthly columns consisting of engaging interviews with experts on current issues in solid tumor oncology, hematologic malignancies, hematologic disorders, drug development, and clinical case studies with expert commentary. CAH&O also publishes industry-supported meeting highlights, clinical roundtable monographs, and clinical review supplements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信