Camila da Silva Cendon Duran, Valéria de Falco Caparbo, Mittermayer Barreto Santiago, Bidossessi Wilfried Hounkpe, Ana Luisa Souza Pedreira, Isabella Vargas de Souza Lima, Henrique Ayres Mayrink Giardini, Virgínia Lucia Nazario Bonoldi, Diogo Souza Domiciano, Samuel Katsuyuki Shinjo, Rosa Maria R Pereira
{"title":"Serum osteoprotegerin and its gene polymorphisms in patients with Takayasu's arteritis: a bicentric cross-sectional study.","authors":"Camila da Silva Cendon Duran, Valéria de Falco Caparbo, Mittermayer Barreto Santiago, Bidossessi Wilfried Hounkpe, Ana Luisa Souza Pedreira, Isabella Vargas de Souza Lima, Henrique Ayres Mayrink Giardini, Virgínia Lucia Nazario Bonoldi, Diogo Souza Domiciano, Samuel Katsuyuki Shinjo, Rosa Maria R Pereira","doi":"10.1186/s42358-024-00384-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Takayasu's arteritis (TAK) patients are at an elevated risk of metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Currently, there are no well-validated biomarkers to assess this risk in this population. Previous research in different cohorts has linked serum levels of osteoprotegerin (OPG) and its polymorphisms to accelerated atherosclerosis and a marker of poor prognosis in CVD. Thus, we assessed this protein as a potential biomarker of CVD in TAK patients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the serum levels of OPG and its SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) in TAK patients and healthy controls, and to associate these parameters with clinical data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This bicentric cross-sectional study included TAK patients who were compared with healthy individuals (control group). The serum levels of OPG and the frequency of OPG SNPs [1181G > C (rs2073618), 245 A > C (rs3134069), 163T > C (rs3102735), and 209 C > T (rs3134070)] were compared between the both groups and associated with clinical data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 101 TAK patients and 93 controls were included in the study. The serum levels of OPG (3.8 ± 1.9 vs. 4.3 ± 1.8pmol/L, respectively; P = 0.059), and its four polymorphisms were comparable between both groups. In an additional analysis of only TAK patients, serum OPG levels and its four genes were not associated with any CVD parameters, except for higher OPG levels among patients without dyslipidemia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant differences were observed in serum OPG levels or in the genotype frequencies of OPG SNPs between the patient and control groups. Similarly, no correlation was found between laboratory parameters and clinical data on CVD risk in TAK patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":48634,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42358-024-00384-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Takayasu's arteritis (TAK) patients are at an elevated risk of metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Currently, there are no well-validated biomarkers to assess this risk in this population. Previous research in different cohorts has linked serum levels of osteoprotegerin (OPG) and its polymorphisms to accelerated atherosclerosis and a marker of poor prognosis in CVD. Thus, we assessed this protein as a potential biomarker of CVD in TAK patients.
Objectives: To evaluate the serum levels of OPG and its SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) in TAK patients and healthy controls, and to associate these parameters with clinical data.
Methods: This bicentric cross-sectional study included TAK patients who were compared with healthy individuals (control group). The serum levels of OPG and the frequency of OPG SNPs [1181G > C (rs2073618), 245 A > C (rs3134069), 163T > C (rs3102735), and 209 C > T (rs3134070)] were compared between the both groups and associated with clinical data.
Results: In total, 101 TAK patients and 93 controls were included in the study. The serum levels of OPG (3.8 ± 1.9 vs. 4.3 ± 1.8pmol/L, respectively; P = 0.059), and its four polymorphisms were comparable between both groups. In an additional analysis of only TAK patients, serum OPG levels and its four genes were not associated with any CVD parameters, except for higher OPG levels among patients without dyslipidemia.
Conclusion: No significant differences were observed in serum OPG levels or in the genotype frequencies of OPG SNPs between the patient and control groups. Similarly, no correlation was found between laboratory parameters and clinical data on CVD risk in TAK patients.
导言:高安氏动脉炎(TAK)患者罹患代谢综合征和心血管疾病(CVD)的风险较高。目前,尚无有效的生物标志物来评估这一人群的风险。以前在不同队列中进行的研究表明,血清中的骨保护蛋白(OPG)及其多态性与动脉粥样硬化的加速和心血管疾病的不良预后有关。因此,我们将该蛋白作为TAK患者心血管疾病的潜在生物标志物进行了评估:评估TAK患者和健康对照组血清中OPG及其SNPs(单核苷酸多态性)的水平,并将这些参数与临床数据联系起来:这项双中心横断面研究将TAK患者与健康人(对照组)进行比较。方法:这项双中心横断面研究将TAK患者与健康人(对照组)进行比较,比较两组血清中OPG的水平以及OPG SNPs[1181G > C (rs2073618)、245 A > C (rs3134069)、163T > C (rs3102735)和209 C > T (rs3134070)]的频率,并将其与临床数据联系起来:研究共纳入101例TAK患者和93例对照组。两组患者的血清 OPG 水平(分别为 3.8 ± 1.9 vs. 4.3 ± 1.8pmol/L;P = 0.059)及其四种多态性具有可比性。在一项仅针对TAK患者的额外分析中,除了无血脂异常患者的OPG水平较高外,血清OPG水平及其四个基因与任何心血管疾病参数均无关联:结论:患者组和对照组之间的血清 OPG 水平或 OPG SNPs 基因型频率没有明显差异。同样,TAK患者的实验室参数与心血管疾病风险的临床数据之间也未发现相关性。
期刊介绍:
Formerly named Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia, the journal is celebrating its 60th year of publication.
Advances in Rheumatology is an international, open access journal publishing pre-clinical, translational and clinical studies on all aspects of paediatric and adult rheumatic diseases, including degenerative, inflammatory and autoimmune conditions. The journal is the official publication of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology and welcomes original research (including systematic reviews and meta-analyses), literature reviews, guidelines and letters arising from published material.