Why do individuals with Williams syndrome or Down syndrome fail the Weather Prediction Task?

IF 1.8 4区 心理学 Q3 DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
Emilie Bochud-Fragnière, Gianni Lonchampt, Paola Bittolo, Giada Ehrensperger, Antonella Rita Circelli, Nicole Antonicelli, Floriana Costanzo, Deny Menghini, Stefano Vicari, Pamela Banta Lavenex, Pierre Lavenex
{"title":"Why do individuals with Williams syndrome or Down syndrome fail the Weather Prediction Task?","authors":"Emilie Bochud-Fragnière,&nbsp;Gianni Lonchampt,&nbsp;Paola Bittolo,&nbsp;Giada Ehrensperger,&nbsp;Antonella Rita Circelli,&nbsp;Nicole Antonicelli,&nbsp;Floriana Costanzo,&nbsp;Deny Menghini,&nbsp;Stefano Vicari,&nbsp;Pamela Banta Lavenex,&nbsp;Pierre Lavenex","doi":"10.1002/dev.22503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Williams syndrome (WS) and Down syndrome (DS) are two neurodevelopmental disorders with distinct genetic origins characterized by mild to moderate intellectual disability. Individuals with WS or DS exhibit impaired hippocampus-dependent place learning and enhanced striatum-dependent spatial response learning. Here, we used the Weather Prediction Task (WPT), which can be solved using hippocampus- or striatum-dependent learning strategies, to determine whether individuals with WS or DS exhibit similar profiles outside the spatial domain. Only 10% of individuals with WS or DS solved the WPT. We further assessed whether a concurrent memory task could promote reliance on procedural learning to solve the WPT in individuals with WS but found that the concurrent task did not improve performance. To understand how the probabilistic cue–outcome associations influences WPT performance, and whether individuals with WS or DS can ignore distractors, we assessed performance using a visual learning task with differing reward contingencies, and a modified WPT with unpredictive cues. Both probabilistic feedback and distractors negatively impacted the performance of individuals with WS or DS. These findings are consistent with deficits in hippocampus-dependent learning and executive functions, and reveal the importance of congruent feedback and the minimization of distractors to optimize learning in these two populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":11086,"journal":{"name":"Developmental psychobiology","volume":"66 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dev.22503","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental psychobiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dev.22503","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Williams syndrome (WS) and Down syndrome (DS) are two neurodevelopmental disorders with distinct genetic origins characterized by mild to moderate intellectual disability. Individuals with WS or DS exhibit impaired hippocampus-dependent place learning and enhanced striatum-dependent spatial response learning. Here, we used the Weather Prediction Task (WPT), which can be solved using hippocampus- or striatum-dependent learning strategies, to determine whether individuals with WS or DS exhibit similar profiles outside the spatial domain. Only 10% of individuals with WS or DS solved the WPT. We further assessed whether a concurrent memory task could promote reliance on procedural learning to solve the WPT in individuals with WS but found that the concurrent task did not improve performance. To understand how the probabilistic cue–outcome associations influences WPT performance, and whether individuals with WS or DS can ignore distractors, we assessed performance using a visual learning task with differing reward contingencies, and a modified WPT with unpredictive cues. Both probabilistic feedback and distractors negatively impacted the performance of individuals with WS or DS. These findings are consistent with deficits in hippocampus-dependent learning and executive functions, and reveal the importance of congruent feedback and the minimization of distractors to optimize learning in these two populations.

Abstract Image

为什么威廉姆斯综合症或唐氏综合症患者无法完成天气预测任务?
威廉姆斯综合征(WS)和唐氏综合征(DS)是两种具有不同遗传起源的神经发育障碍疾病,以轻度至中度智力障碍为特征。WS或DS患者表现出依赖海马的位置学习能力受损,而依赖纹状体的空间反应学习能力增强。在这里,我们使用了天气预报任务(WPT)来确定WS或DS患者在空间领域之外是否表现出类似的特征,该任务可以使用海马或纹状体依赖的学习策略来解决。只有10%的WS或DS患者解决了WPT。我们进一步评估了同时进行的记忆任务是否能促进 WS 患者依靠程序学习来解决 WPT,但发现同时进行的任务并没有提高他们的成绩。为了了解概率性线索-结果关联如何影响 WPT 成绩,以及 WS 或 DS 患者能否忽略分心因素,我们使用了具有不同奖励或然性的视觉学习任务和具有非预测性线索的改良 WPT 来评估成绩。概率反馈和干扰因素都对 WS 或 DS 患者的表现产生了负面影响。这些发现与海马依赖性学习和执行功能的缺陷相一致,并揭示了一致反馈和最小化分心物对优化这两种人群学习的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Developmental psychobiology
Developmental psychobiology 生物-发育生物学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
18.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Developmental Psychobiology is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research papers from the disciplines of psychology, biology, neuroscience, and medicine that contribute to an understanding of behavior development. Research that focuses on development in the embryo/fetus, neonate, juvenile, or adult animal and multidisciplinary research that relates behavioral development to anatomy, physiology, biochemistry, genetics, or evolution is appropriate. The journal represents a broad phylogenetic perspective on behavior development by publishing studies of invertebrates, fish, birds, humans, and other animals. The journal publishes experimental and descriptive studies whether carried out in the laboratory or field. The journal also publishes review articles and theoretical papers that make important conceptual contributions. Special dedicated issues of Developmental Psychobiology , consisting of invited papers on a topic of general interest, may be arranged with the Editor-in-Chief. Developmental Psychobiology also publishes Letters to the Editor, which discuss issues of general interest or material published in the journal. Letters discussing published material may correct errors, provide clarification, or offer a different point of view. Authors should consult the editors on the preparation of these contributions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信