Evolutionary and functional analyses of LRP5 in archaic and extant modern humans.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Neus Roca-Ayats, Iago Maceda, Carlos David Bruque, Núria Martínez-Gil, Natàlia Garcia-Giralt, Mónica Cozar, Leonardo Mellibovsky, Wim Van Hul, Oscar Lao, Daniel Grinberg, Susanna Balcells
{"title":"Evolutionary and functional analyses of LRP5 in archaic and extant modern humans.","authors":"Neus Roca-Ayats, Iago Maceda, Carlos David Bruque, Núria Martínez-Gil, Natàlia Garcia-Giralt, Mónica Cozar, Leonardo Mellibovsky, Wim Van Hul, Oscar Lao, Daniel Grinberg, Susanna Balcells","doi":"10.1186/s40246-024-00616-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The human lineage has undergone a postcranial skeleton gracilization (i.e. lower bone mass and strength relative to body size) compared to other primates and archaic populations such as the Neanderthals. This gracilization has been traditionally explained by differences in the mechanical load that our ancestors exercised. However, there is growing evidence that gracilization could also be genetically influenced.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We have analyzed the LRP5 gene, which is known to be associated with high bone mineral density conditions, from an evolutionary and functional point of view. Taking advantage of the published genomes of archaic Homo populations, our results suggest that this gene has a complex evolutionary history both between archaic and living humans and within living human populations. In particular, we identified the presence of different selective pressures in archaics and extant modern humans, as well as evidence of positive selection in the African and South East Asian populations from the 1000 Genomes Project. Furthermore, we observed a very limited evidence of archaic introgression in this gene (only at three haplotypes of East Asian ancestry out of the 1000 Genomes), compatible with a general erasing of the fingerprint of archaic introgression due to functional differences in archaics compared to extant modern humans. In agreement with this hypothesis, we observed private mutations in the archaic genomes that we experimentally validated as putatively increasing bone mineral density. In particular, four of five archaic missense mutations affecting the first β-propeller of LRP5 displayed enhanced Wnt pathway activation, of which two also displayed reduced negative regulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In summary, these data suggest a genetic component contributing to the understanding of skeletal differences between extant modern humans and archaic Homo populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":13183,"journal":{"name":"Human Genomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11131306/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40246-024-00616-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The human lineage has undergone a postcranial skeleton gracilization (i.e. lower bone mass and strength relative to body size) compared to other primates and archaic populations such as the Neanderthals. This gracilization has been traditionally explained by differences in the mechanical load that our ancestors exercised. However, there is growing evidence that gracilization could also be genetically influenced.

Results: We have analyzed the LRP5 gene, which is known to be associated with high bone mineral density conditions, from an evolutionary and functional point of view. Taking advantage of the published genomes of archaic Homo populations, our results suggest that this gene has a complex evolutionary history both between archaic and living humans and within living human populations. In particular, we identified the presence of different selective pressures in archaics and extant modern humans, as well as evidence of positive selection in the African and South East Asian populations from the 1000 Genomes Project. Furthermore, we observed a very limited evidence of archaic introgression in this gene (only at three haplotypes of East Asian ancestry out of the 1000 Genomes), compatible with a general erasing of the fingerprint of archaic introgression due to functional differences in archaics compared to extant modern humans. In agreement with this hypothesis, we observed private mutations in the archaic genomes that we experimentally validated as putatively increasing bone mineral density. In particular, four of five archaic missense mutations affecting the first β-propeller of LRP5 displayed enhanced Wnt pathway activation, of which two also displayed reduced negative regulation.

Conclusions: In summary, these data suggest a genetic component contributing to the understanding of skeletal differences between extant modern humans and archaic Homo populations.

古人类和现代人中 LRP5 的进化和功能分析。
背景:与其他灵长类动物和尼安德特人等古人类相比,人类的颅后骨骼出现了 gracilization(即骨量和强度相对于体型较低)。传统的解释是,我们的祖先所承受的机械负荷不同。然而,越来越多的证据表明,匍匐也可能受到基因的影响:结果:我们从进化和功能的角度分析了已知与高骨矿物质密度相关的 LRP5 基因。利用已公布的古人类种群基因组,我们的研究结果表明,该基因在古人类和活人之间以及活人种群内部都有着复杂的进化历史。特别是,我们在古人类和现存现代人中发现了不同的选择性压力,并在 "千人基因组计划 "的非洲和东南亚人群中发现了正选择的证据。此外,我们在该基因中观察到了非常有限的古人类引入的证据(在 1000 个基因组中只有三个东亚祖先的单倍型),这与古人类与现存现代人在功能上的差异导致古人类引入的指纹被普遍消除是一致的。与这一假设一致的是,我们在古人类基因组中观察到了经实验验证可增加骨矿物质密度的私人突变。特别是,影响 LRP5 第一个 β-推进器的五个古基因错义突变中有四个显示出 Wnt 通路激活增强,其中两个还显示出负性调节减少:总之,这些数据表明,遗传因素有助于理解现存现代人与古智人之间的骨骼差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Genomics
Human Genomics GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
55
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Genomics is a peer-reviewed, open access, online journal that focuses on the application of genomic analysis in all aspects of human health and disease, as well as genomic analysis of drug efficacy and safety, and comparative genomics. Topics covered by the journal include, but are not limited to: pharmacogenomics, genome-wide association studies, genome-wide sequencing, exome sequencing, next-generation deep-sequencing, functional genomics, epigenomics, translational genomics, expression profiling, proteomics, bioinformatics, animal models, statistical genetics, genetic epidemiology, human population genetics and comparative genomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信