Integrating randomized and observational studies to estimate optimal dynamic treatment regimes.

IF 1.4 4区 数学 Q3 BIOLOGY
Biometrics Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1093/biomtc/ujae046
Anna Batorsky, Kevin J Anstrom, Donglin Zeng
{"title":"Integrating randomized and observational studies to estimate optimal dynamic treatment regimes.","authors":"Anna Batorsky, Kevin J Anstrom, Donglin Zeng","doi":"10.1093/biomtc/ujae046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sequential multiple assignment randomized trials (SMARTs) are the gold standard for estimating optimal dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs), but are costly and require a large sample size. We introduce the multi-stage augmented Q-learning estimator (MAQE) to improve efficiency of estimation of optimal DTRs by augmenting SMART data with observational data. Our motivating example comes from the Back Pain Consortium, where one of the overarching aims is to learn how to tailor treatments for chronic low back pain to individual patient phenotypes, knowledge which is lacking clinically. The Consortium-wide collaborative SMART and observational studies within the Consortium collect data on the same participant phenotypes, treatments, and outcomes at multiple time points, which can easily be integrated. Previously published single-stage augmentation methods for integration of trial and observational study (OS) data were adapted to estimate optimal DTRs from SMARTs using Q-learning. Simulation studies show the MAQE, which integrates phenotype, treatment, and outcome information from multiple studies over multiple time points, more accurately estimates the optimal DTR, and has a higher average value than a comparable Q-learning estimator without augmentation. We demonstrate this improvement is robust to a wide range of trial and OS sample sizes, addition of noise variables, and effect sizes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8930,"journal":{"name":"Biometrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11130757/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biometrics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/biomtc/ujae046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sequential multiple assignment randomized trials (SMARTs) are the gold standard for estimating optimal dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs), but are costly and require a large sample size. We introduce the multi-stage augmented Q-learning estimator (MAQE) to improve efficiency of estimation of optimal DTRs by augmenting SMART data with observational data. Our motivating example comes from the Back Pain Consortium, where one of the overarching aims is to learn how to tailor treatments for chronic low back pain to individual patient phenotypes, knowledge which is lacking clinically. The Consortium-wide collaborative SMART and observational studies within the Consortium collect data on the same participant phenotypes, treatments, and outcomes at multiple time points, which can easily be integrated. Previously published single-stage augmentation methods for integration of trial and observational study (OS) data were adapted to estimate optimal DTRs from SMARTs using Q-learning. Simulation studies show the MAQE, which integrates phenotype, treatment, and outcome information from multiple studies over multiple time points, more accurately estimates the optimal DTR, and has a higher average value than a comparable Q-learning estimator without augmentation. We demonstrate this improvement is robust to a wide range of trial and OS sample sizes, addition of noise variables, and effect sizes.

整合随机研究和观察研究,估算最佳动态治疗方案。
顺序多重分配随机试验(SMART)是估算最佳动态治疗方案(DTR)的黄金标准,但成本高昂,且需要大量样本。我们引入了多阶段增强 Q 学习估计器(MAQE),通过观测数据增强 SMART 数据来提高最佳动态治疗方案的估计效率。我们的激励性实例来自背痛联盟,该联盟的总体目标之一是学习如何根据患者的个体表型来定制慢性腰背痛的治疗方法,而这正是临床上所缺乏的知识。联盟内的 SMART 合作研究和观察性研究收集了多个时间点上相同参与者的表型、治疗和结果数据,这些数据很容易整合。之前发表的用于整合试验和观察性研究(OS)数据的单阶段增强方法经过调整后,可使用 Q-learning 从 SMARTs 中估算出最佳 DTR。模拟研究表明,MAQE 整合了多个研究在多个时间点上的表型、治疗和结果信息,能更准确地估计出最佳 DTR,其平均值也高于未进行扩增的同类 Q-learning 估计器。我们证明了这种改进对各种试验和操作系统样本大小、噪声变量的添加以及效应大小都是稳健的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biometrics
Biometrics 生物-生物学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
178
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Biometric Society is an international society promoting the development and application of statistical and mathematical theory and methods in the biosciences, including agriculture, biomedical science and public health, ecology, environmental sciences, forestry, and allied disciplines. The Society welcomes as members statisticians, mathematicians, biological scientists, and others devoted to interdisciplinary efforts in advancing the collection and interpretation of information in the biosciences. The Society sponsors the biennial International Biometric Conference, held in sites throughout the world; through its National Groups and Regions, it also Society sponsors regional and local meetings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信