Antireflux mucosectomy for gastroesophageal reflux disease: efficacy and the mechanism of action.

IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Endoscopy Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-27 DOI:10.1055/a-2333-5232
Thijs Kuipers, Renske A B Oude Nijhuis, Roos E Pouw, Albert J Bredenoord
{"title":"Antireflux mucosectomy for gastroesophageal reflux disease: efficacy and the mechanism of action.","authors":"Thijs Kuipers, Renske A B Oude Nijhuis, Roos E Pouw, Albert J Bredenoord","doi":"10.1055/a-2333-5232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies suggested that antireflux mucosectomy (ARMS) is effective in reducing reflux symptoms and total acid exposure, although the mechanism is unknown. Our objective was to investigate the effect of ARMS on reflux parameters and its mechanism of action.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients with insufficient symptom control despite a twice-daily proton pump inhibitor (PPI) underwent a piecemeal multiband mucosectomy of 50% of the circumference of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ), extending 2 cm into the cardia. The primary end point was the total number of reflux episodes during 24-hour pH-impedance studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>11 patients (8 men; median age 37 [interquartile range (IQR) 32-57] years) were treated, with one patient subsequently lost to follow-up. ARMS reduced the median (IQR) number of total reflux episodes (74 [60-82] vs. 37 [28-66]; P = 0.008) and total acid exposure time (8.7% [6.4%-12.7%] vs. 5.3% [3.5%-6.7%]; P = 0.03). Treatment reduced the median (IQR) number of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) during a 90-minute postprandial period (4 [1-8] vs. 2 [1-4]; P = 0.03) and reflux symptom scores (3.6 [3.6-3.9] vs. 1.6 [0.7-2.7]; <i>P</i> = 0.005). Treatment did not increase the mean (SD) dysphagia scores (8.2 [7.3] vs. 8.5 [6.5]) or change the EGJ distensibility on impedance planimetry (4.4 [2.1] vs. 4.3 [2.2] mm2/mmHg). One delayed post-procedural bleed requiring repeat endoscopy occurred (10%); no strictures developed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ARMS is an effective treatment option in PPI-refractory GERD, reducing acid exposure, reflux episodes, and symptoms. While its working mechanism could not be explained by a difference in distensibility, a reduction in TLESRs might play a role.</p>","PeriodicalId":11516,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":"897-905"},"PeriodicalIF":11.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2333-5232","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous studies suggested that antireflux mucosectomy (ARMS) is effective in reducing reflux symptoms and total acid exposure, although the mechanism is unknown. Our objective was to investigate the effect of ARMS on reflux parameters and its mechanism of action.

Methods: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients with insufficient symptom control despite a twice-daily proton pump inhibitor (PPI) underwent a piecemeal multiband mucosectomy of 50% of the circumference of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ), extending 2 cm into the cardia. The primary end point was the total number of reflux episodes during 24-hour pH-impedance studies.

Results: 11 patients (8 men; median age 37 [interquartile range (IQR) 32-57] years) were treated, with one patient subsequently lost to follow-up. ARMS reduced the median (IQR) number of total reflux episodes (74 [60-82] vs. 37 [28-66]; P = 0.008) and total acid exposure time (8.7% [6.4%-12.7%] vs. 5.3% [3.5%-6.7%]; P = 0.03). Treatment reduced the median (IQR) number of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) during a 90-minute postprandial period (4 [1-8] vs. 2 [1-4]; P = 0.03) and reflux symptom scores (3.6 [3.6-3.9] vs. 1.6 [0.7-2.7]; P = 0.005). Treatment did not increase the mean (SD) dysphagia scores (8.2 [7.3] vs. 8.5 [6.5]) or change the EGJ distensibility on impedance planimetry (4.4 [2.1] vs. 4.3 [2.2] mm2/mmHg). One delayed post-procedural bleed requiring repeat endoscopy occurred (10%); no strictures developed.

Conclusion: ARMS is an effective treatment option in PPI-refractory GERD, reducing acid exposure, reflux episodes, and symptoms. While its working mechanism could not be explained by a difference in distensibility, a reduction in TLESRs might play a role.

胃食管反流病的抗反流粘液切除术:疗效和作用机制。
以往的研究表明,抗反流粘液切除术(ARMS)可有效减少反流症状和总酸暴露量,但其机制尚不清楚。我们的目的是研究抗反流粘液切除术对反流参数的影响及其作用机制:方法:每日两次服用质子泵抑制剂(PPI)但症状控制不佳的胃食管反流(GERD)患者接受了食管-胃交界处(EGJ)50%周长的多带粘膜切除术,并延伸至贲门2厘米处。主要终点是 24 小时 pH 阻抗研究中的反流总次数:11名患者接受了治疗(8名男性,年龄37(32-57)岁),1名患者在治疗后失去了随访机会。ARMS将反流次数从74次(50-82次)减少到37次(28-66次)(P=0.008),酸暴露总量从8.7%(6.4-12.7)减少到5.3%(3.5-6.7)(P=0.008)。治疗减少了餐后 90 分钟内瞬时下食管括约肌松弛(TLESR)的次数(从 4(1-8)次减少到 2(1-4)次,p=0.027)。反流症状大幅减少(从 3.6(3.6-3.9)降至 1.6(0.7-2.7),p=0.007)。治疗没有增加吞咽困难(简易食管吞咽困难问卷),从 8.2 (±7.3) 降至 8.5 (±6.5) (p=0.879)。阻抗平面测量法显示,治疗后 EGJ 的扩张性没有变化(从 4.4 (±2.1) mm2/mmHg 降至 4.3 (±2.2) mm2/mmHg,p=0.952)。术后发生了一次延迟出血(10%,(1/10)),需要再次进行内镜检查,但没有出现狭窄:结论:ARMS 是 PPI 难治性胃食管反流病患者的有效治疗方案,可减少酸暴露、反流发作和症状。虽然其工作机制无法用扩张性的差异来解释,但TLSER的减少可能会起到一定作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endoscopy
Endoscopy 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
1401
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Endoscopy is a leading journal covering the latest technologies and global advancements in gastrointestinal endoscopy. With guidance from an international editorial board, it delivers high-quality content catering to the needs of endoscopists, surgeons, clinicians, and researchers worldwide. Publishing 12 issues each year, Endoscopy offers top-quality review articles, original contributions, prospective studies, surveys of diagnostic and therapeutic advances, and comprehensive coverage of key national and international meetings. Additionally, articles often include supplementary online video content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信