Association of Radiographic Soft Tissue Thickness With Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty Following Primary Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Minimum of 5-year Follow-up.

Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2024-05-26 eCollection Date: 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1177/24730114241255351
Kevin A Wu, Albert T Anastasio, Alexandra N Krez, Katherine M Kutzer, James K DeOrio, Mark E Easley, James A Nunley, Samuel B Adams
{"title":"Association of Radiographic Soft Tissue Thickness With Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty Following Primary Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Minimum of 5-year Follow-up.","authors":"Kevin A Wu, Albert T Anastasio, Alexandra N Krez, Katherine M Kutzer, James K DeOrio, Mark E Easley, James A Nunley, Samuel B Adams","doi":"10.1177/24730114241255351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incidence of primary total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is rising, with a corresponding increase in revision surgeries. Despite this, research on risk factors for revision TAA following primary TAA remains limited. Radiographic soft tissue thickness has been explored as a potential predictor for outcomes in hip, knee, and shoulder arthroplasty, but its role in TAA has not been assessed. This study aimed to assess the predictive value of radiographic soft tissue thickness for identifying patients at risk of requiring revision surgery following primary TAA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on 323 patients who underwent primary TAA between 2003 and 2019. Radiographic measurements of soft tissue thickness were obtained from preoperative radiographs. Two novel radiographic measures of soft tissue thickness were developed and assessed (tibial tissue thickness and talus tissue thickness). Clinical variables including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, diabetes, smoking status, primary diagnosis, and implant type were recorded. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the predictive value of soft tissue thickness and BMI for revision TAA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rate of revision surgery was 4.3% (14 of 323 patients). Patients requiring revision had significantly greater tibial tissue (3.54 vs 2.48 cm; <i>P</i> = .02) and talus tissue (2.79 vs 2.42 cm; <i>P</i> = .02) thickness compared with those not requiring revision. Both the tibial tissue thickness (odds ratio 1.16 [1.12-1.20]; <i>P</i> < .01) and the talus tissue thickness (odds ratio: 1.10 [1.05-1.15]; <i>P</i> < .01) measurements were significant predictors of revision TAA in multivariable logistic regression models. However, BMI was not a significant predictor of revision TAA. The two metrics demonstrated excellent interrater reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Greater soft tissue thickness was a better predictor of revision TAA compared with BMI. These findings suggest that radiographic soft tissue thickness may be a valuable tool for assessing the risk of the need for revision TAA following primary TAA. Further research is needed to validate and explore the potential impact on clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, comparative study.</p>","PeriodicalId":12429,"journal":{"name":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","volume":"9 2","pages":"24730114241255351"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11129576/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24730114241255351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The incidence of primary total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is rising, with a corresponding increase in revision surgeries. Despite this, research on risk factors for revision TAA following primary TAA remains limited. Radiographic soft tissue thickness has been explored as a potential predictor for outcomes in hip, knee, and shoulder arthroplasty, but its role in TAA has not been assessed. This study aimed to assess the predictive value of radiographic soft tissue thickness for identifying patients at risk of requiring revision surgery following primary TAA.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 323 patients who underwent primary TAA between 2003 and 2019. Radiographic measurements of soft tissue thickness were obtained from preoperative radiographs. Two novel radiographic measures of soft tissue thickness were developed and assessed (tibial tissue thickness and talus tissue thickness). Clinical variables including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, diabetes, smoking status, primary diagnosis, and implant type were recorded. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the predictive value of soft tissue thickness and BMI for revision TAA.

Results: The rate of revision surgery was 4.3% (14 of 323 patients). Patients requiring revision had significantly greater tibial tissue (3.54 vs 2.48 cm; P = .02) and talus tissue (2.79 vs 2.42 cm; P = .02) thickness compared with those not requiring revision. Both the tibial tissue thickness (odds ratio 1.16 [1.12-1.20]; P < .01) and the talus tissue thickness (odds ratio: 1.10 [1.05-1.15]; P < .01) measurements were significant predictors of revision TAA in multivariable logistic regression models. However, BMI was not a significant predictor of revision TAA. The two metrics demonstrated excellent interrater reliability.

Conclusion: Greater soft tissue thickness was a better predictor of revision TAA compared with BMI. These findings suggest that radiographic soft tissue thickness may be a valuable tool for assessing the risk of the need for revision TAA following primary TAA. Further research is needed to validate and explore the potential impact on clinical practice.

Level of evidence: Level III, comparative study.

原发性全踝关节置换术后放射学软组织厚度与翻修全踝关节置换术的关系:至少 5 年的随访。
背景:初次全踝关节置换术(TAA)的发病率不断上升,翻修手术也相应增加。尽管如此,对初次 TAA 后翻修 TAA 风险因素的研究仍然有限。已将X光软组织厚度作为髋、膝和肩关节置换术结果的潜在预测因素进行了探讨,但尚未评估其在踝关节置换术中的作用。本研究旨在评估影像学软组织厚度对识别原发性 TAA 后需要进行翻修手术的风险患者的预测价值:方法:对2003年至2019年期间接受原发性TAA手术的323名患者进行了回顾性研究。软组织厚度的影像学测量是通过术前X光片获得的。开发并评估了两种新的软组织厚度影像学测量方法(胫骨组织厚度和距骨组织厚度)。临床变量包括年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分类、糖尿病、吸烟状况、主要诊断和植入类型。采用逻辑回归分析评估软组织厚度和体重指数对翻修 TAA 的预测价值:结果:翻修手术率为4.3%(323例患者中有14例)。与不需要翻修的患者相比,需要翻修的患者胫骨组织(3.54 vs 2.48 cm; P = .02)和距骨组织(2.79 vs 2.42 cm; P = .02)厚度明显更大。胫骨组织厚度(几率比 1.16 [1.12-1.20];P P 结论:与体重指数相比,更大的软组织厚度更能预测翻修后的 TAA。这些研究结果表明,影像学软组织厚度可能是评估原发性 TAA 后需要翻修 TAA 风险的重要工具。需要进一步的研究来验证和探索其对临床实践的潜在影响:III级,比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1152
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信