Young people's and adults' views and experiences of decision-making to manage compromised first permanent molars: a qualitative study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Greig D Taylor, Catherine Exley, Nicola Innes, Christopher Robert Vernazza
{"title":"Young people's and adults' views and experiences of decision-making to manage compromised first permanent molars: a qualitative study.","authors":"Greig D Taylor, Catherine Exley, Nicola Innes, Christopher Robert Vernazza","doi":"10.1111/ipd.13217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Little information on young people's and adults' views and experiences on decision-making for managing compromised first permanent molars (cFPM) exists.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To establish young people's and adults' views and experiences of decision-making for managing cFPM.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Face-to-face (online) semi-structured interviews were undertaken using an iteratively designed topic guide. Participants aged 12-65 were purposively sampled with recruitment from different dental clinics (three primary care, an out-of-hours emergency and one dental hospital). Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three themes were generated from young people's interviews (n = 9): (i) influencing factors; (ii) long-term considerations; and (iii) shared decision-making. Three themes were generated from adults' interviews (n = 13): (i) influences that affect decisions; (ii) perceptions of the specialist's role; and (iii) importance of shared decision-making for children and young people.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Several factors influenced decision-making; for young people, professional opinions were important, and parental/peer influences less so. For adults, it was based on decisions on their prior experiences. Adults felt young people were abnormal if referred to a specialist. Young people wanted autonomy in decision-making to be respected; in reality, their views were rarely heard. There is potential to increase young people's involvement in shared decision-making for cFPM, which aligns with their aspirations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14268,"journal":{"name":"International journal of paediatric dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of paediatric dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.13217","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Little information on young people's and adults' views and experiences on decision-making for managing compromised first permanent molars (cFPM) exists.

Aim: To establish young people's and adults' views and experiences of decision-making for managing cFPM.

Design: Face-to-face (online) semi-structured interviews were undertaken using an iteratively designed topic guide. Participants aged 12-65 were purposively sampled with recruitment from different dental clinics (three primary care, an out-of-hours emergency and one dental hospital). Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis.

Results: Three themes were generated from young people's interviews (n = 9): (i) influencing factors; (ii) long-term considerations; and (iii) shared decision-making. Three themes were generated from adults' interviews (n = 13): (i) influences that affect decisions; (ii) perceptions of the specialist's role; and (iii) importance of shared decision-making for children and young people.

Conclusion: Several factors influenced decision-making; for young people, professional opinions were important, and parental/peer influences less so. For adults, it was based on decisions on their prior experiences. Adults felt young people were abnormal if referred to a specialist. Young people wanted autonomy in decision-making to be respected; in reality, their views were rarely heard. There is potential to increase young people's involvement in shared decision-making for cFPM, which aligns with their aspirations.

年轻人和成年人对管理受损第一恒磨牙决策的看法和经验:一项定性研究。
背景:目的:了解年轻人和成年人对受损第一恒磨牙(cFPM)管理决策的看法和经验:设计:采用反复设计的主题指南进行面对面(在线)半结构式访谈。从不同的牙科诊所(三家初级保健诊所、一家非工作时间急诊诊所和一家牙科医院)有目的地抽取了 12-65 岁的参与者。对访谈进行了录音、逐字记录和主题分析:从年轻人的访谈(n = 9)中产生了三个主题:(i) 影响因素;(ii) 长期考虑;(iii) 共同决策。成人访谈(n = 13)中产生了三个主题:(i) 影响决策的因素;(ii) 对专家角色的看法;(iii) 共同决策对儿童和青少年的重要性:影响决策的因素有几个;对年轻人来说,专业意见很重要,而父母/同伴的影响较小。对成年人来说,决策是根据他们以前的经验做出的。成年人认为,如果把年轻人转介给专家,他们会觉得不正常。年轻人希望决策自主权得到尊重;但实际上,他们的意见很少被听取。我们有可能让年轻人更多地参与到与他们的愿望相一致的儿童慢性阻塞性肺病共同决策中来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry was formed in 1991 by the merger of the Journals of the International Association of Paediatric Dentistry and the British Society of Paediatric Dentistry and is published bi-monthly. It has true international scope and aims to promote the highest standard of education, practice and research in paediatric dentistry world-wide. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry publishes papers on all aspects of paediatric dentistry including: growth and development, behaviour management, diagnosis, prevention, restorative treatment and issue relating to medically compromised children or those with disabilities. This peer-reviewed journal features scientific articles, reviews, case reports, clinical techniques, short communications and abstracts of current paediatric dental research. Analytical studies with a scientific novelty value are preferred to descriptive studies. Case reports illustrating unusual conditions and clinically relevant observations are acceptable but must be of sufficiently high quality to be considered for publication; particularly the illustrative material must be of the highest quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信