Reliability of an extended version of the 3m™ Eargage tool to assess earcanal size and assist earplug selection.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
International Journal of Audiology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-28 DOI:10.1080/14992027.2024.2352045
Bastien Poissenot-Arrigoni, Laurence Martin, Alessia Negrini, Djamal Berbiche, Olivier Doutres, Franck Sgard
{"title":"Reliability of an extended version of the 3m™ Eargage tool to assess earcanal size and assist earplug selection.","authors":"Bastien Poissenot-Arrigoni, Laurence Martin, Alessia Negrini, Djamal Berbiche, Olivier Doutres, Franck Sgard","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2352045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate the ability of an extended version of the 3 M<sup>TM</sup> Eargage to estimate the earcanal size and assess the likelihood that a particular earplug can fit an individual's earcanal, ultimately serving as a tool for selecting earplugs in the field.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Earcanal morphology, assessed through earcanal earmolds scans, is compared to earcanal size assessed with the extended eargage (EE) via box plots and Pearson linear correlations coefficients. Relations between attenuation measured on participants (for 6 different earplugs) and their earcanal size assessed with the EE are established via comparison tests.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>121 participants exposed to occupational noise (103 men, 18 women, mean age 47 year<i>s</i>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The earcanal size assessed with the EE allows for estimating the area of the earcanal's first bend cross-section (correlation coefficient <math><mi> </mi><mi>r</mi></math> = 0.533, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Extremely large earcanals (12.7% of earcanals in our sample) lead to significantly lower earplug attenuation (potentially inadequate) than smaller earcanals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The EE is a simple and inexpensive tool easily deployable in the field to assist earplugs selection. When extended with sizes larger than the maximum size of the commercial tool, it allows for detecting individuals with extremely large earcanals who are most likely to be under-protected.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"392-401"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2352045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Evaluate the ability of an extended version of the 3 MTM Eargage to estimate the earcanal size and assess the likelihood that a particular earplug can fit an individual's earcanal, ultimately serving as a tool for selecting earplugs in the field.

Design: Earcanal morphology, assessed through earcanal earmolds scans, is compared to earcanal size assessed with the extended eargage (EE) via box plots and Pearson linear correlations coefficients. Relations between attenuation measured on participants (for 6 different earplugs) and their earcanal size assessed with the EE are established via comparison tests.

Study sample: 121 participants exposed to occupational noise (103 men, 18 women, mean age 47 years).

Results: The earcanal size assessed with the EE allows for estimating the area of the earcanal's first bend cross-section (correlation coefficient  r = 0.533, p < 0.001). Extremely large earcanals (12.7% of earcanals in our sample) lead to significantly lower earplug attenuation (potentially inadequate) than smaller earcanals.

Conclusions: The EE is a simple and inexpensive tool easily deployable in the field to assist earplugs selection. When extended with sizes larger than the maximum size of the commercial tool, it allows for detecting individuals with extremely large earcanals who are most likely to be under-protected.

用于评估耳道大小和辅助选择耳塞的 3m™ Eargage 工具扩展版的可靠性。
目标:评估 3 MTM 耳模扩展版估计耳廓大小的能力,并评估特定耳塞适合个人耳廓的可能性,最终作为现场选择耳塞的工具:设计:通过箱形图和皮尔逊线性相关系数,将耳廓扫描评估的耳廓形态与扩展耳廓(EE)评估的耳廓大小进行比较。研究样本:121 名暴露于职业噪声的参与者(103 名男性,18 名女性,平均年龄 47 岁):结果:用 EE 评估的耳廓大小可以估算出耳廓第一弯曲横截面的面积(相关系数 r = 0.533,p 结论:EE 是一种简单、价廉的耳廓测量方法:EE 是一种简单而廉价的工具,易于在现场使用,可帮助选择耳塞。当扩展到比商用工具的最大尺寸更大时,它可以检测出耳廓特别大的人,这些人最有可能保护不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Audiology
International Journal of Audiology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信