Multimodal diagnosis of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea: State of the art review and emerging concepts

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Sina J. Torabi MD, Arash Abiri PhD, Xinlei Chen BS, Mehmet Senel PhD, Frank P. K. Hsu MD, PhD, Andrej Lupták PhD, Michelle Khine PhD, Edward C. Kuan MD, MBA
{"title":"Multimodal diagnosis of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea: State of the art review and emerging concepts","authors":"Sina J. Torabi MD,&nbsp;Arash Abiri PhD,&nbsp;Xinlei Chen BS,&nbsp;Mehmet Senel PhD,&nbsp;Frank P. K. Hsu MD, PhD,&nbsp;Andrej Lupták PhD,&nbsp;Michelle Khine PhD,&nbsp;Edward C. Kuan MD, MBA","doi":"10.1002/lio2.1272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Currently, diagnosis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea relies on a multimodal approach, increasing costs and ultimately delaying diagnosis. In the United States and internationally, the crux of such a diagnosis relies on confirmation testing (via biomarkers) and localization (e.g., imaging). Biomarker testing may require analysis at an outside facility, resulting in delays diagnosis and treatment. In addition, specialized imaging may be nonspecific and often requires an active leak for diagnosis. There remains a clear need for innovative new technology.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A comprehensive review was conducted on both foundational and innovative scholarly articles regarding current and emerging diagnosis modalities for CSF.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Current modalities in CSF rhinorrhea diagnosis and localization include laboratory tests (namely, B2T immunofixation), imaging (CT and/or MRI) with or without intrathecal administration, and surgical exploration. Each of these modalities carry flaws, risks, and benefits, ultimately contributing to delays in diagnosis and morbidity. Promising emerging technologies include lateral flow immunoassays (LFI) and biologically functionalized field-effect transistors (BioFET). Nevertheless, these carry some drawbacks of their own, and require further validation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>CSF rhinorrhea remains a challenging diagnosis, requiring a multimodal approach to differentiate from nonpathologic causes of rhinorrhea. Current methods in diagnosis are imperfect, as the ideal test would be a readily accessible, inexpensive, rapid, highly accurate point-of-care test without the need for excess fluid or specialized processing. Critical work is being done to develop promising, new, improved tests, though a clear successor has not yet emerged.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>N/A</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48529,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lio2.1272","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.1272","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Currently, diagnosis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea relies on a multimodal approach, increasing costs and ultimately delaying diagnosis. In the United States and internationally, the crux of such a diagnosis relies on confirmation testing (via biomarkers) and localization (e.g., imaging). Biomarker testing may require analysis at an outside facility, resulting in delays diagnosis and treatment. In addition, specialized imaging may be nonspecific and often requires an active leak for diagnosis. There remains a clear need for innovative new technology.

Methods

A comprehensive review was conducted on both foundational and innovative scholarly articles regarding current and emerging diagnosis modalities for CSF.

Results

Current modalities in CSF rhinorrhea diagnosis and localization include laboratory tests (namely, B2T immunofixation), imaging (CT and/or MRI) with or without intrathecal administration, and surgical exploration. Each of these modalities carry flaws, risks, and benefits, ultimately contributing to delays in diagnosis and morbidity. Promising emerging technologies include lateral flow immunoassays (LFI) and biologically functionalized field-effect transistors (BioFET). Nevertheless, these carry some drawbacks of their own, and require further validation.

Conclusion

CSF rhinorrhea remains a challenging diagnosis, requiring a multimodal approach to differentiate from nonpathologic causes of rhinorrhea. Current methods in diagnosis are imperfect, as the ideal test would be a readily accessible, inexpensive, rapid, highly accurate point-of-care test without the need for excess fluid or specialized processing. Critical work is being done to develop promising, new, improved tests, though a clear successor has not yet emerged.

Level of Evidence

N/A

Abstract Image

脑脊液鼻出血的多模式诊断:最新进展回顾与新概念
目的 目前,脑脊液(CSF)鼻出血的诊断依赖于多模式方法,增加了成本并最终延误了诊断。在美国和国际上,此类诊断的关键在于确认测试(通过生物标志物)和定位(如成像)。生物标志物检测可能需要在外部机构进行分析,导致诊断和治疗延误。此外,专门的成像可能不具有特异性,通常需要主动漏诊才能确诊。因此,显然需要创新的新技术。 方法 对有关当前和新兴 CSF 诊断模式的基础性和创新性学术文章进行了全面综述。 结果 目前诊断和定位 CSF 鼻漏的方法包括实验室检测(即 B2T 免疫固定)、鞘内给药或不给药的成像(CT 和/或 MRI)以及手术探查。这些方法各有缺陷、风险和益处,最终导致诊断延误和发病率上升。前景看好的新兴技术包括侧向流免疫测定(LFI)和生物功能化场效应晶体管(BioFET)。不过,这些技术本身也存在一些缺点,需要进一步验证。 结论 CSF 鼻出血仍然是一项具有挑战性的诊断,需要采用多模式方法将其与非病理原因引起的鼻出血区分开来。目前的诊断方法并不完善,因为理想的检测方法应该是随时可用、价格低廉、快速、高度准确的床旁检测,而不需要过多的液体或专门的处理过程。尽管尚未出现明确的继任者,但人们正在努力开发前景广阔的新型改良检测方法。 证据等级 不适用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信