How the COVID-19 pandemic changed forest visits in Switzerland: Is there a back to normal?

IF 7.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Anne C. Wunderlich , Boris Salak , K. Tessa Hegetschweiler , Nicole Bauer , Marcel Hunziker
{"title":"How the COVID-19 pandemic changed forest visits in Switzerland: Is there a back to normal?","authors":"Anne C. Wunderlich ,&nbsp;Boris Salak ,&nbsp;K. Tessa Hegetschweiler ,&nbsp;Nicole Bauer ,&nbsp;Marcel Hunziker","doi":"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Lockdown measures implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic led to a rise in people’s visits to forests and urban green spaces. However, as vaccination efforts progressed and infection rates declined, it remained uncertain whether forest visitation levels would return to pre-pandemic norms or even decreased. To explore the post-crisis status of forest visits, we conducted a comprehensive analysis using data from a representative online panel survey conducted in Switzerland. Specifically, we compared data collected one week prior to the lockdown (in March 2020), on visit frequency, duration, activities and locations visited, with data collected two weeks after the lockdown was enforced (2020), and also with data from the summer of 2021. We aimed to determine if forest visitation had returned to normal by the time of the third survey. Our findings indicate that during times of crisis, visitation patterns and recreational preferences in urban green spaces, such as forests, undergo changes, with some of these changes exhibiting greater persistence than others. Meanwhile the activities during a forest visit as well as motivations of forest visits seem to return to their initial levels after the crisis, for example, the changes in the frequency or lengths of the visits appear to be more persistent. Recognizing and understanding these changes are crucial for urban planners and forest management authorities to adapt policies and effectively address the evolving needs of visitors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54744,"journal":{"name":"Landscape and Urban Planning","volume":"249 ","pages":"Article 105126"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204624001257/pdfft?md5=409c5d94414a022b12be30b2a036deab&pid=1-s2.0-S0169204624001257-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape and Urban Planning","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204624001257","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lockdown measures implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic led to a rise in people’s visits to forests and urban green spaces. However, as vaccination efforts progressed and infection rates declined, it remained uncertain whether forest visitation levels would return to pre-pandemic norms or even decreased. To explore the post-crisis status of forest visits, we conducted a comprehensive analysis using data from a representative online panel survey conducted in Switzerland. Specifically, we compared data collected one week prior to the lockdown (in March 2020), on visit frequency, duration, activities and locations visited, with data collected two weeks after the lockdown was enforced (2020), and also with data from the summer of 2021. We aimed to determine if forest visitation had returned to normal by the time of the third survey. Our findings indicate that during times of crisis, visitation patterns and recreational preferences in urban green spaces, such as forests, undergo changes, with some of these changes exhibiting greater persistence than others. Meanwhile the activities during a forest visit as well as motivations of forest visits seem to return to their initial levels after the crisis, for example, the changes in the frequency or lengths of the visits appear to be more persistent. Recognizing and understanding these changes are crucial for urban planners and forest management authorities to adapt policies and effectively address the evolving needs of visitors.

COVID-19 大流行如何改变了瑞士的森林探访:恢复正常了吗?
COVID-19 大流行期间实施的封锁措施导致人们前往森林和城市绿地的次数增加。然而,随着疫苗接种工作的进展和感染率的下降,森林访问量是否会恢复到大流行前的水平甚至下降仍是个未知数。为了探究危机后的森林访问状况,我们利用在瑞士进行的具有代表性的在线小组调查数据进行了综合分析。具体来说,我们将封锁前一周(2020 年 3 月)收集的有关访问频率、持续时间、活动和访问地点的数据,与封锁实施两周后(2020 年)收集的数据,以及 2021 年夏季的数据进行了比较。我们的目的是确定在第三次调查时森林访问量是否已恢复正常。我们的研究结果表明,在危机时期,森林等城市绿地的游览模式和娱乐偏好会发生变化,其中一些变化比其他变化表现出更强的持续性。同时,在危机过后,游览森林期间的活动以及游览森林的动机似乎会恢复到最初的水平,例如,游览频率或游览时间的变化似乎更加持久。认识和了解这些变化对于城市规划者和森林管理部门调整政策和有效满足游客不断变化的需求至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Landscape and Urban Planning
Landscape and Urban Planning 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
6.60%
发文量
232
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Landscape and Urban Planning is an international journal that aims to enhance our understanding of landscapes and promote sustainable solutions for landscape change. The journal focuses on landscapes as complex social-ecological systems that encompass various spatial and temporal dimensions. These landscapes possess aesthetic, natural, and cultural qualities that are valued by individuals in different ways, leading to actions that alter the landscape. With increasing urbanization and the need for ecological and cultural sensitivity at various scales, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary to comprehend and align social and ecological values for landscape sustainability. The journal believes that combining landscape science with planning and design can yield positive outcomes for both people and nature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信