A Retrospective Case-Control Study Evaluating Effects of Beck's Cognitive Therapy on Anxiety in Patients after Breast Reconstruction.

IF 1.3 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Yan Li, Yu Wang, Yaqi Wang, Leyuan Zhao, Jianhui Gan
{"title":"A Retrospective Case-Control Study Evaluating Effects of Beck's Cognitive Therapy on Anxiety in Patients after Breast Reconstruction.","authors":"Yan Li, Yu Wang, Yaqi Wang, Leyuan Zhao, Jianhui Gan","doi":"10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.231303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the effects of Beck's cognitive therapy on the anxiety of patients after breast reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 150 patients with breast cancer undergoing breast reconstruction from June 2020 to June 2021 in our hospital, excluded 5 patients who did not meet the inclusion criteria, divided the remaining cases into an experimental group (EG, n = 70, perioperative routine management + Beck's cognitive therapy intervention) and a reference group (RG, n = 75, perioperative routine management) in accordance with different perioperative intervention programs, and compared the emotions of anxiety and depression, sense of social disability, and prognosis quality in both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 2 months after surgery (T2) and 3 months after surgery (T3), EG had overtly lower Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) scores than RG (<i>P</i> < .05), with no difference in HAMA and BDI scores at 3 days before surgery (T0) and 1 month after surgery (T1) (<i>P</i> > .05). At the T0 stage, both groups were diagnosed as having a social disability, with no overt difference (<i>P</i> > .05). At T1 stage, The Social Disability Screening Schedule (SDSS) scores in both groups increased remarkably and fell back at the T2 and T3 stages. At T1-T2 stages, SDSS scores of EG were significantly different from those of RG (<i>P</i> < .05), with no significant difference at T3 stage (<i>P</i> > .05). The excellent rate of prognosis in EG was 78.57% (55/70), higher than 77.33% (58/75) in RG, with no statistical difference in both groups (<i>P</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The implementation of Beck's cognitive therapy in patients with breast reconstruction effectively improves adverse emotions in patients, which is of great significance for promoting postoperative rehabilitation and is an effective intervention program in the perioperative period.</p>","PeriodicalId":72151,"journal":{"name":"Alpha psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11114150/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alpha psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.231303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the effects of Beck's cognitive therapy on the anxiety of patients after breast reconstruction.

Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 150 patients with breast cancer undergoing breast reconstruction from June 2020 to June 2021 in our hospital, excluded 5 patients who did not meet the inclusion criteria, divided the remaining cases into an experimental group (EG, n = 70, perioperative routine management + Beck's cognitive therapy intervention) and a reference group (RG, n = 75, perioperative routine management) in accordance with different perioperative intervention programs, and compared the emotions of anxiety and depression, sense of social disability, and prognosis quality in both groups.

Results: At 2 months after surgery (T2) and 3 months after surgery (T3), EG had overtly lower Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) scores than RG (P < .05), with no difference in HAMA and BDI scores at 3 days before surgery (T0) and 1 month after surgery (T1) (P > .05). At the T0 stage, both groups were diagnosed as having a social disability, with no overt difference (P > .05). At T1 stage, The Social Disability Screening Schedule (SDSS) scores in both groups increased remarkably and fell back at the T2 and T3 stages. At T1-T2 stages, SDSS scores of EG were significantly different from those of RG (P < .05), with no significant difference at T3 stage (P > .05). The excellent rate of prognosis in EG was 78.57% (55/70), higher than 77.33% (58/75) in RG, with no statistical difference in both groups (P < .05).

Conclusion: The implementation of Beck's cognitive therapy in patients with breast reconstruction effectively improves adverse emotions in patients, which is of great significance for promoting postoperative rehabilitation and is an effective intervention program in the perioperative period.

一项回顾性病例对照研究,评估贝克认知疗法对乳房再造术后患者焦虑症的影响。
目的:探讨贝克认知疗法对乳房再造术后患者焦虑的影响:探讨贝克认知疗法对乳房再造术后患者焦虑的影响:本研究回顾性分析我院2020年6月-2021年6月150例乳腺癌乳房再造术患者的临床资料,排除5例不符合纳入标准的患者,将剩余病例按照不同的围手术期干预方案分为实验组(EG,n=70,围手术期常规管理+贝克认知疗法干预)和参照组(RG,n=75,围手术期常规管理),比较两组患者的焦虑和抑郁情绪、社会残障感、预后质量:术后2个月(T2)和术后3个月(T3),EG的汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)和贝克抑郁量表(BDI)评分明显低于RG(P<0.05),术前3天(T0)和术后1个月(T1)的HAMA和BDI评分无差异(P>0.05)。在 T0 阶段,两组患者均被诊断为社会残疾,无明显差异(P > .05)。在 T1 阶段,两组患者的社会残疾筛查表(SDSS)得分均显著上升,而在 T2 和 T3 阶段则有所回落。在 T1-T2 阶段,EG 的 SDSS 评分与 RG 的 SDSS 评分有显著差异(P < .05),而在 T3 阶段则无显著差异(P > .05)。EG预后优良率为78.57%(55/70),高于RG的77.33%(58/75),两组无统计学差异(P < .05):在乳房再造患者中实施贝克认知疗法可有效改善患者的不良情绪,对促进术后康复具有重要意义,是围手术期的有效干预方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信