Comparing Post-operative Pain and Other Outcomes in Carotid Endarterectomy Versus Transcarotid Artery Revascularization.

Vascular and endovascular surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-26 DOI:10.1177/15385744241257153
Trevor Dorey, Sara Parmiter, Jamie Sanders, Justin Turcotte, Geetha Jeyabalan
{"title":"Comparing Post-operative Pain and Other Outcomes in Carotid Endarterectomy Versus Transcarotid Artery Revascularization.","authors":"Trevor Dorey, Sara Parmiter, Jamie Sanders, Justin Turcotte, Geetha Jeyabalan","doi":"10.1177/15385744241257153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) is growing in popularity. Although major clinical end-points such as stroke rate and mortality are well-known, patient reported outcomes such as pain, and length of stay are among the purported benefits that are as yet untested. We sought to determine if there are differences in pain and other clinical outcomes when comparing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and TCAR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective review of 326 patients undergoing TCAR (n = 50) or CEA (n = 276) from 2019-2023. Primary outcomes of interest were maximum pain numeric rating scales (NRS) reported in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and on postoperative days (POD) zero and 1, and oral morphine milligram equivalents (OMMEs) received intraoperatively through POD1. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), complications, and 30-day emergency department (ED) returns/readmissions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty TCAR and 150 CEA patients were included in the propensity score matched cohorts. TCAR patients reported lower pain-NRS in PACU (<i>P</i> < .001) and on POD0 (<i>P</i> = .002), but similar pain scores on POD1 (<i>P</i> = .112). Postoperatively, TCAR patients were less likely to receive opioids (52% vs 75.3%, <i>P</i> = .003) and received less OMME from PACU through POD1 (12.8 ± 16.2 vs 23.2 ± 27.2, <i>P</i> = .001). After adjusting for age, sex, BMI, prior chronic opioid use, and prior carotid surgery, TCAR patients were approximately 70% less likely to receive post-operative opioids. No significant differences in LOS, 30-day ED returns/readmissions, or complications were observed between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with CEA, patients undergoing TCAR reported lower pain scores and consumed fewer narcotics overall. However, the absolute difference was modest, and pain scores were low in both cohorts. Differences in pain and post-operative narcotic use may be of less importance when deciding between TCAR and CEA. Total non-opioid protocols may be feasible in both approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744241257153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) is growing in popularity. Although major clinical end-points such as stroke rate and mortality are well-known, patient reported outcomes such as pain, and length of stay are among the purported benefits that are as yet untested. We sought to determine if there are differences in pain and other clinical outcomes when comparing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and TCAR.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 326 patients undergoing TCAR (n = 50) or CEA (n = 276) from 2019-2023. Primary outcomes of interest were maximum pain numeric rating scales (NRS) reported in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and on postoperative days (POD) zero and 1, and oral morphine milligram equivalents (OMMEs) received intraoperatively through POD1. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), complications, and 30-day emergency department (ED) returns/readmissions.

Results: Fifty TCAR and 150 CEA patients were included in the propensity score matched cohorts. TCAR patients reported lower pain-NRS in PACU (P < .001) and on POD0 (P = .002), but similar pain scores on POD1 (P = .112). Postoperatively, TCAR patients were less likely to receive opioids (52% vs 75.3%, P = .003) and received less OMME from PACU through POD1 (12.8 ± 16.2 vs 23.2 ± 27.2, P = .001). After adjusting for age, sex, BMI, prior chronic opioid use, and prior carotid surgery, TCAR patients were approximately 70% less likely to receive post-operative opioids. No significant differences in LOS, 30-day ED returns/readmissions, or complications were observed between groups.

Conclusions: Compared with CEA, patients undergoing TCAR reported lower pain scores and consumed fewer narcotics overall. However, the absolute difference was modest, and pain scores were low in both cohorts. Differences in pain and post-operative narcotic use may be of less importance when deciding between TCAR and CEA. Total non-opioid protocols may be feasible in both approaches.

颈动脉内膜剥脱术与经颈动脉血运重建术的术后疼痛及其他疗效比较
背景:经颈动脉血运重建术(TCAR)越来越受欢迎。虽然中风率和死亡率等主要临床终点众所周知,但疼痛和住院时间等患者报告的结果是尚未得到检验的所谓益处。我们试图确定在比较颈动脉内膜剥脱术(CEA)和 TCAR 时,疼痛和其他临床结果是否存在差异:我们对2019-2023年期间接受TCAR(n = 50)或CEA(n = 276)治疗的326名患者进行了回顾性研究。主要研究结果包括麻醉后护理病房(PACU)和术后第 0 天和第 1 天(POD)报告的最大疼痛数字评分量表(NRS),以及术中至 POD1 期间接受的口服吗啡毫克当量(OMMEs)。次要结果包括住院时间(LOS)、并发症和30天急诊科(ED)复诊/再入院率:50名TCAR患者和150名CEA患者被纳入倾向评分匹配队列。TCAR患者在PACU(P < .001)和POD0(P = .002)时的疼痛-NRS评分较低,但在POD1(P = .112)时的疼痛评分相似。术后,TCAR 患者接受阿片类药物的可能性较低(52% vs 75.3%,P = .003),从 PACU 到 POD1 期间接受的 OMME 较少(12.8 ± 16.2 vs 23.2 ± 27.2,P = .001)。在对年龄、性别、体重指数、既往长期使用阿片类药物和既往颈动脉手术进行调整后,TCAR 患者术后使用阿片类药物的可能性降低了约 70%。两组患者在住院时间、30天急诊室复诊/再次入院或并发症方面无明显差异:结论:与CEA相比,接受TCAR手术的患者疼痛评分较低,使用的麻醉药物也较少。结论:与 CEA 相比,接受 TCAR 的患者疼痛评分较低,麻醉剂用量也较少,但绝对差异不大,而且两组患者的疼痛评分都较低。在决定TCAR还是CEA时,疼痛和术后麻醉药使用量的差异可能并不那么重要。在这两种方法中,完全不使用阿片类药物的方案可能是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信