Primary brain lymphoma and glioblastoma: evaluation of DCE T1 and DSC T2 MRI perfusion findings.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Acta radiologica Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-26 DOI:10.1177/02841851241256781
Hamza Soydan, Deniz Sözmen Cılız, Turay Cesur, Eda Tezgör Aksakal
{"title":"Primary brain lymphoma and glioblastoma: evaluation of DCE T1 and DSC T2 MRI perfusion findings.","authors":"Hamza Soydan, Deniz Sözmen Cılız, Turay Cesur, Eda Tezgör Aksakal","doi":"10.1177/02841851241256781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The accurate differentiation of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) from glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is clinically crucial due to the different treatment strategies between them.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To define magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) perfusion findings in PCNSL to make a safe distinction from GBM with dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) T1 and DSC T2 MRI perfusion findings.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis included 19 patients with histopathologically diagnosed PCNSL and 21 individuals with GBM. DCE T1 vascular permeability perfusion values including K-trans, Ve, Kep, IAUGC, and DSC T2 perfusion values including cerebral blood volume (CBV) and cerebral blood flow (CBF) in axial sections from the pathological lesion and contralateral normal brain parenchyma were measured quantitatively using region of interest analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study observed no statistically significant difference between patients with PCNSL (T/B cell) and GBM in the median values of DCE T1 perfusion ratios (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Nevertheless, the DSC T2 perfusion ratios showed a substantial distinction between the two groups. In contrast to patients with PCNSL (1.185 vs. 1.224, respectively), those with GBM had higher median levels of r-CBV and r-CBF (2.898 vs. 2.467, respectively; <i>P</i> 0.01). A cutoff value of ≤1.473 for r-CBV (Lesion/N) and ≤1.6005 for r-CBF (Lesion/N) was found to estimate the positivity of PCNSL.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DSC T2 MRI perfusion values showed lower r-CBV and r-CBF values in PCNSL patients compared to GBM patients. According to the findings, r-CBV and r-CBF are the most accurate MRI perfusion parameters for distinguishing between PCSNL and GBM.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851241256781","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The accurate differentiation of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) from glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is clinically crucial due to the different treatment strategies between them.

Purpose: To define magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) perfusion findings in PCNSL to make a safe distinction from GBM with dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) T1 and DSC T2 MRI perfusion findings.

Material and methods: This retrospective analysis included 19 patients with histopathologically diagnosed PCNSL and 21 individuals with GBM. DCE T1 vascular permeability perfusion values including K-trans, Ve, Kep, IAUGC, and DSC T2 perfusion values including cerebral blood volume (CBV) and cerebral blood flow (CBF) in axial sections from the pathological lesion and contralateral normal brain parenchyma were measured quantitatively using region of interest analysis.

Results: The study observed no statistically significant difference between patients with PCNSL (T/B cell) and GBM in the median values of DCE T1 perfusion ratios (P > 0.05). Nevertheless, the DSC T2 perfusion ratios showed a substantial distinction between the two groups. In contrast to patients with PCNSL (1.185 vs. 1.224, respectively), those with GBM had higher median levels of r-CBV and r-CBF (2.898 vs. 2.467, respectively; P 0.01). A cutoff value of ≤1.473 for r-CBV (Lesion/N) and ≤1.6005 for r-CBF (Lesion/N) was found to estimate the positivity of PCNSL.

Conclusion: DSC T2 MRI perfusion values showed lower r-CBV and r-CBF values in PCNSL patients compared to GBM patients. According to the findings, r-CBV and r-CBF are the most accurate MRI perfusion parameters for distinguishing between PCSNL and GBM.

原发性脑淋巴瘤和胶质母细胞瘤:对 DCE T1 和 DSC T2 MRI 灌注结果的评估。
背景:准确区分原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤(PCNSL)和多形性胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)至关重要:目的:通过动态对比增强(DCE)T1和DSC T2 MRI灌注结果,确定PCNSL的磁共振成像(MRI)灌注结果,以便与GBM进行安全区分:这项回顾性分析包括19名经组织病理学诊断的PCNSL患者和21名GBM患者。采用感兴趣区分析法定量测量病变部位和对侧正常脑实质轴切片的 DCE T1 血管通透性灌注值(包括 K-trans、Ve、Kep、IAUGC)和 DSC T2 灌注值(包括脑血容量(CBV)和脑血流量(CBF)):研究观察到 PCNSL(T/B 细胞)和 GBM 患者的 DCE T1 灌注比中位值差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。然而,DSC T2灌注比却显示出两组患者之间的巨大差异。与 PCNSL 患者(分别为 1.185 对 1.224)相比,GBM 患者的 r-CBV 和 r-CBF 中值水平更高(分别为 2.898 对 2.467;P 0.01)。r-CBV(Lesion/N)≤1.473和r-CBF(Lesion/N)≤1.6005的临界值可用于估计PCNSL的阳性率:结论:与 GBM 患者相比,DSC T2 MRI 灌注值显示 PCNSL 患者的 r-CBV 和 r-CBF 值较低。根据研究结果,r-CBV 和 r-CBF 是区分 PCSNL 和 GBM 最准确的 MRI 灌注参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta radiologica
Acta radiologica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信