Complicating critical discussions in gender sexuality alliances: Youth desire for intersectional conversations and the experience of fragmentation

IF 4.6 2区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Sukhmani Singh, Linda Salgin, Daniel Kellogg, Paris DaSilva, Emma Woodman, V. Paul Poteat, Hirokazu Yoshikawa, Jerel P. Calzo
{"title":"Complicating critical discussions in gender sexuality alliances: Youth desire for intersectional conversations and the experience of fragmentation","authors":"Sukhmani Singh,&nbsp;Linda Salgin,&nbsp;Daniel Kellogg,&nbsp;Paris DaSilva,&nbsp;Emma Woodman,&nbsp;V. Paul Poteat,&nbsp;Hirokazu Yoshikawa,&nbsp;Jerel P. Calzo","doi":"10.1111/jora.12980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Gender sexuality alliances (GSAs) represent consciousness-raisings that hold potential for critical consciousness development in youth. In this study, we focus on critical reflection—the understanding that oppression is structured and maintained by human action. We engage intersectionality as our analytical framework and analyze both student interview data (<i>n</i> = 38) and advisor closed-ended and open-ended survey data (<i>n</i> = 58) to examine: (1) the nature/content of critically reflective discussions in GSAs and (2) how advisors support critically reflective discussions in GSAs and their role in these discussions. Our findings suggest that (1) conversations centering race and its intersections with other socio-structural axes occur, albeit infrequently; (2) youth recognize and understand the concept of intersectionality in nuanced ways, desire to have critical intersectional conversations, and experience fragmentation from conversations around race, sexuality, and gender if they are situated at privileged locations on those axes; and (3) students want advisors to engage in critically reflective discussions in GSAs. The findings suggest that interventions and programming are needed that could cultivate advisors' and youth leaders' skills in facilitating intersectional dialogues for critical reflection among members.</p>","PeriodicalId":17026,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on Adolescence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research on Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jora.12980","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gender sexuality alliances (GSAs) represent consciousness-raisings that hold potential for critical consciousness development in youth. In this study, we focus on critical reflection—the understanding that oppression is structured and maintained by human action. We engage intersectionality as our analytical framework and analyze both student interview data (n = 38) and advisor closed-ended and open-ended survey data (n = 58) to examine: (1) the nature/content of critically reflective discussions in GSAs and (2) how advisors support critically reflective discussions in GSAs and their role in these discussions. Our findings suggest that (1) conversations centering race and its intersections with other socio-structural axes occur, albeit infrequently; (2) youth recognize and understand the concept of intersectionality in nuanced ways, desire to have critical intersectional conversations, and experience fragmentation from conversations around race, sexuality, and gender if they are situated at privileged locations on those axes; and (3) students want advisors to engage in critically reflective discussions in GSAs. The findings suggest that interventions and programming are needed that could cultivate advisors' and youth leaders' skills in facilitating intersectional dialogues for critical reflection among members.

性别-性联盟中的关键性讨论复杂化:青年对跨领域对话的渴望和支离破碎的体验。
性别性联盟(GSAs)是一种意识觉醒活动,具有培养青少年批判意识的潜力。在本研究中,我们将重点放在批判性反思上--即理解压迫是由人类行为所构建和维持的。我们采用交叉性作为分析框架,分析了学生访谈数据(n = 38)和指导教师封闭式和开放式调查数据(n = 58),以研究:(1)GSA 中批判性反思讨论的性质/内容;(2)指导教师如何支持 GSA 中的批判性反思讨论以及他们在这些讨论中的作用。我们的研究结果表明:(1) 以种族及其与其他社会结构轴线的交叉为中心的对话时有发生,尽管并不频繁;(2) 青少年以微妙的方式认识和理解交叉性概念,渴望进行批判性的交叉对话,如果他们处于种族、性和性别轴线上的特权位置,则会在围绕这些轴线的对话中感到支离破碎;(3) 学生希望辅导员参与全球学生体育协会中的批判性反思讨论。研究结果表明,需要采取干预措施和制定计划,以培养顾问和青年领袖促进交叉对话的技能,从而促进成员之间的批判性反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Multidisciplinary and international in scope, the Journal of Research on Adolescence (JRA) significantly advances knowledge in the field of adolescent research. Employing a diverse array of methodologies, this compelling journal publishes original research and integrative reviews of the highest level of scholarship. Featured studies include both quantitative and qualitative methodologies applied to cognitive, physical, emotional, and social development and behavior. Articles pertinent to the variety of developmental patterns inherent throughout adolescence are featured, including cross-national and cross-cultural studies. Attention is given to normative patterns of behavior as well as individual differences rooted in personal or social and cultural factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信