Comparative evaluation of straight and curved extension dialysis catheters for continuous renal replacement therapy in dogs with acute kidney injury.

IF 0.8 4区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
A A Bhat, M Chandrasekar, A P Nambi, S Bhavani, S Kavitha, F A Khan
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of straight and curved extension dialysis catheters for continuous renal replacement therapy in dogs with acute kidney injury.","authors":"A A Bhat, M Chandrasekar, A P Nambi, S Bhavani, S Kavitha, F A Khan","doi":"10.22099/IJVR.2023.47626.6883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A patent dual-lumen dialysis catheter is one of the basic requirements for efficient extracorporeal (EC) therapy.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The objective of this study was to measure the resistance to blood flow offered by straight and curved-extension dual-lumen dialysis catheters used for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty dogs suffering from acute kidney injury (AKI) were subjected to CRRT. The dogs were allocated randomly to Group-I (curved extension catheter, n=12) or Group II (straight extension catheter, n=8), based on the type of dual-lumen catheter used in CRRT. The catheter outflow and inflow pressures were recorded at blood pump speeds of 50 ml/min and 99-100 ml/min. Data were tested for normality, and differences in mean inflow and outflow catheter resistances were evaluated for statistical significance using independent samples t-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Straight extension catheters offered lower inflow resistance than curved extension catheters at both 50 ml/min (41.50 ± 5.84 mm Hg <i>vs.</i> 63.75 ± 6.88 mm Hg, P=0.03) and 99-100 ml/min (63.00 ± 8.11 mm Hg <i>vs.</i> 86.92 ± 7.02 mm Hg, P=0.04) blood flow rates. Straight extension catheters also offered lower outflow resistance than curved catheters at 99-100 ml/min blood flow rate (-94.12 ± 7.91 mm Hg <i>vs.</i> -128.25 ± 7.56 mm Hg, P=0.01; the negative signs only indicate the direction of blood flow).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that straight-extension dual-lumen dialysis catheters perform better than the curved model in extracorporeal renal replacement therapy by considering their lower resistance to blood flow.</p>","PeriodicalId":14629,"journal":{"name":"Iranian journal of veterinary research","volume":"24 4","pages":"335-338"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11127733/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22099/IJVR.2023.47626.6883","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A patent dual-lumen dialysis catheter is one of the basic requirements for efficient extracorporeal (EC) therapy.

Aims: The objective of this study was to measure the resistance to blood flow offered by straight and curved-extension dual-lumen dialysis catheters used for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).

Methods: Twenty dogs suffering from acute kidney injury (AKI) were subjected to CRRT. The dogs were allocated randomly to Group-I (curved extension catheter, n=12) or Group II (straight extension catheter, n=8), based on the type of dual-lumen catheter used in CRRT. The catheter outflow and inflow pressures were recorded at blood pump speeds of 50 ml/min and 99-100 ml/min. Data were tested for normality, and differences in mean inflow and outflow catheter resistances were evaluated for statistical significance using independent samples t-tests.

Results: Straight extension catheters offered lower inflow resistance than curved extension catheters at both 50 ml/min (41.50 ± 5.84 mm Hg vs. 63.75 ± 6.88 mm Hg, P=0.03) and 99-100 ml/min (63.00 ± 8.11 mm Hg vs. 86.92 ± 7.02 mm Hg, P=0.04) blood flow rates. Straight extension catheters also offered lower outflow resistance than curved catheters at 99-100 ml/min blood flow rate (-94.12 ± 7.91 mm Hg vs. -128.25 ± 7.56 mm Hg, P=0.01; the negative signs only indicate the direction of blood flow).

Conclusion: These findings suggest that straight-extension dual-lumen dialysis catheters perform better than the curved model in extracorporeal renal replacement therapy by considering their lower resistance to blood flow.

对用于急性肾损伤犬持续肾脏替代疗法的直式和弯式延伸透析导管进行比较评估。
背景:目的:本研究的目的是测量用于持续肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)的直管和弯管双腔透析导管的血流阻力:方法:20 只患有急性肾损伤(AKI)的狗接受了 CRRT 治疗。根据 CRRT 中使用的双腔导管类型,这些狗被随机分配到第一组(弯曲延伸导管,12 只)或第二组(直延伸导管,8 只)。在血泵速度为 50 毫升/分钟和 99-100 毫升/分钟时记录导管流出和流入压力。对数据进行了正态性检验,并使用独立样本 t 检验对导管流入和流出平均阻力的差异进行了统计学意义评估:结果:在 50 毫升/分钟(41.50 ± 5.84 mm Hg vs. 63.75 ± 6.88 mm Hg,P=0.03)和 99-100 毫升/分钟(63.00 ± 8.11 mm Hg vs. 86.92 ± 7.02 mm Hg,P=0.04)血流速度下,直伸导管的流入阻力均低于弯伸导管。在血流量为 99-100 毫升/分钟时,直伸导管的流出阻力也低于弯曲导管(-94.12 ± 7.91 mm Hg vs. -128.25 ± 7.56 mm Hg,P=0.01;负号仅表示血流方向):这些研究结果表明,考虑到直伸型双腔透析导管的血流阻力较小,因此在体外肾脏替代疗法中其性能优于弯曲型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: The Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research(IJVR) is published quarterly in 4 issues. The aims of this journal are to improve and expand knowledge in all veterinary fields. It is an international journal indexed by the Thomson Institute for Scientific Information (ISI), Elsevier, Scopus, CAB International, Veterinary Bulletin and several other international databases. Research papers and reports on a wide range of veterinary topics are published in the journal after being evaluated by expert reviewers.The Editor-in-Chief is responsible for the editorial content of the journal—including peer-reviewed manuscripts—and the timing of its publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信