Beyond biophobia: positive appraisal of bats among German residents during the COVID-19 pandemic - with consequences for conservation intentions

IF 3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Tanja M. Straka, Joanna L. Coleman, Ewan A. Macdonald, Svea Rogge, Tigga Kingston, Maarten H. Jacobs
{"title":"Beyond biophobia: positive appraisal of bats among German residents during the COVID-19 pandemic - with consequences for conservation intentions","authors":"Tanja M. Straka, Joanna L. Coleman, Ewan A. Macdonald, Svea Rogge, Tigga Kingston, Maarten H. Jacobs","doi":"10.1007/s10531-024-02872-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bats are often considered to be objects of biophobia, i.e., the tendency to respond with a negative emotion, such as fear or disgust, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, existing studies have rarely compared both positive and negative emotions towards bats, leading to a potential negativity bias. This is crucial given the importance of emotions to bat-related human behaviours, such as in bat conservation-related actions. Via two online surveys conducted among German residents, we aimed to (i) assess positive and negative emotions towards bats, (ii) examine emotional shifts during the pandemic and (iii) explore how emotions, along with socio-demographics, predict the intent to perform bat-conservation actions. The first survey was undertaken ten months after the official declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic (December 2020 - January 2021), when bats gained societal attention due to speculation about the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and the second one ran twelve months later (January 2022). Overall, respondents held higher positive emotions than negative ones towards bats in both surveys, with no significant emotional shift observed. Positive emotions positively correlated with intentions to perform bat-conservation actions, while negative emotions showed no such relationship. Although our findings might be context-specific to populations in Germany or Europe, given European-Union legislation protecting bats and their habitats, they highlight the nuanced and complicated emotions that can be associated with certain species. Understanding these emotions can guide targeted conservation strategies and public outreach. Our results caution against overly generalising discussions of biophobia in conservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8843,"journal":{"name":"Biodiversity and Conservation","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biodiversity and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-024-02872-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bats are often considered to be objects of biophobia, i.e., the tendency to respond with a negative emotion, such as fear or disgust, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, existing studies have rarely compared both positive and negative emotions towards bats, leading to a potential negativity bias. This is crucial given the importance of emotions to bat-related human behaviours, such as in bat conservation-related actions. Via two online surveys conducted among German residents, we aimed to (i) assess positive and negative emotions towards bats, (ii) examine emotional shifts during the pandemic and (iii) explore how emotions, along with socio-demographics, predict the intent to perform bat-conservation actions. The first survey was undertaken ten months after the official declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic (December 2020 - January 2021), when bats gained societal attention due to speculation about the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and the second one ran twelve months later (January 2022). Overall, respondents held higher positive emotions than negative ones towards bats in both surveys, with no significant emotional shift observed. Positive emotions positively correlated with intentions to perform bat-conservation actions, while negative emotions showed no such relationship. Although our findings might be context-specific to populations in Germany or Europe, given European-Union legislation protecting bats and their habitats, they highlight the nuanced and complicated emotions that can be associated with certain species. Understanding these emotions can guide targeted conservation strategies and public outreach. Our results caution against overly generalising discussions of biophobia in conservation.

Abstract Image

超越生物恐惧症:COVID-19 大流行期间德国居民对蝙蝠的积极评价--对保护意图的影响
蝙蝠通常被认为是生物恐怖症的对象,即倾向于以恐惧或厌恶等负面情绪来应对,尤其是在 COVID-19 大流行期间。然而,现有的研究很少比较对蝙蝠的积极和消极情绪,从而导致潜在的消极偏差。鉴于情绪对与蝙蝠相关的人类行为(如与蝙蝠保护相关的行动)的重要性,这一点至关重要。通过对德国居民进行的两次在线调查,我们旨在(i)评估对蝙蝠的积极和消极情绪;(ii)研究大流行期间的情绪变化;(iii)探索情绪与社会人口统计学如何预测采取蝙蝠保护行动的意愿。第一次调查是在 COVID-19 大流行正式宣布十个月后(2020 年 12 月至 2021 年 1 月)进行的,当时由于对 SARS-CoV-2 病毒来源的猜测,蝙蝠受到了社会的关注;第二次调查是在十二个月后(2022 年 1 月)进行的。总体而言,在两次调查中,受访者对蝙蝠的积极情绪高于消极情绪,没有观察到明显的情绪变化。积极情绪与采取保护蝙蝠行动的意愿呈正相关,而消极情绪则没有这种关系。虽然我们的发现可能与德国或欧洲的具体情况有关,但考虑到欧盟立法保护蝙蝠及其栖息地,这些发现凸显了与某些物种相关的细微而复杂的情绪。了解这些情绪可以指导有针对性的保护策略和公众宣传。我们的研究结果告诫人们,在讨论保护中的生物恐怖症时不要过于笼统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biodiversity and Conservation
Biodiversity and Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
153
审稿时长
9-18 weeks
期刊介绍: Biodiversity and Conservation is an international journal that publishes articles on all aspects of biological diversity-its description, analysis and conservation, and its controlled rational use by humankind. The scope of Biodiversity and Conservation is wide and multidisciplinary, and embraces all life-forms. The journal presents research papers, as well as editorials, comments and research notes on biodiversity and conservation, and contributions dealing with the practicalities of conservation management, economic, social and political issues. The journal provides a forum for examining conflicts between sustainable development and human dependence on biodiversity in agriculture, environmental management and biotechnology, and encourages contributions from developing countries to promote broad global perspectives on matters of biodiversity and conservation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信