Combination of the internal standard and dominant factor PLS for improving long-term stability of LIBS measurements

IF 3.1 2区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Yang Zhou, Lanxiang Sun, Yang Li, Yong Xin, Wei Dong and Jinchi Wang
{"title":"Combination of the internal standard and dominant factor PLS for improving long-term stability of LIBS measurements","authors":"Yang Zhou, Lanxiang Sun, Yang Li, Yong Xin, Wei Dong and Jinchi Wang","doi":"10.1039/D4JA00006D","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Improving long-term stability is an important issue for large-scale applications of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS). Unlike laboratory instruments, many applications of LIBS instruments are in harsh outdoor environments, where instrument drift can lead to deterioration of long-term stability, hindering the use of LIBS technology in applications with high-precision requirements. In this work, based on the designed LIBS sensor for molten steel, we analyzed the spectral drift problem of different day measurements, on the basis of which we proposed a drift correction method combining the internal standard and the dominant factor partial least squares (PLS) regression. In this method, spectra are first preprocessed to build an internal standard model of the elemental concentration ratios to spectral line intensity ratios. Then the PLS regression is utilized to construct a corrected model between the spectral intensity and the drift value of the intensity ratio. Finally, elemental concentration predictions are made by using the established internal standard model with modified spectral line intensity ratios. The method was tested on low alloy steel samples. In the experiment, the detection spectra were recorded for 9 days for quantitative analysis and drift correction of the major elements C, Si, Cr, Ni, Cu, and Mn in alloy steels. Compared with the uncalibrated internal standard method, for the prediction of unknown samples over a long period of time, the RMSE values of C, Si, Cr, Ni, Cu, and Mn decreased by 48.74%, 50.00%, 73.30%, 72.15%, 72.57%, and 18.23%, respectively, and the RSD decreased by 27.71%, 42.97%, 35.17%, 38.95%, 55.58%, and 23.40%, respectively. Furthermore, several typical drift correction methods were also studied for comparison, and the proposed method achieved the best results for different test sets.</p>","PeriodicalId":81,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry","volume":" 7","pages":" 1778-1788"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/ja/d4ja00006d","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Improving long-term stability is an important issue for large-scale applications of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS). Unlike laboratory instruments, many applications of LIBS instruments are in harsh outdoor environments, where instrument drift can lead to deterioration of long-term stability, hindering the use of LIBS technology in applications with high-precision requirements. In this work, based on the designed LIBS sensor for molten steel, we analyzed the spectral drift problem of different day measurements, on the basis of which we proposed a drift correction method combining the internal standard and the dominant factor partial least squares (PLS) regression. In this method, spectra are first preprocessed to build an internal standard model of the elemental concentration ratios to spectral line intensity ratios. Then the PLS regression is utilized to construct a corrected model between the spectral intensity and the drift value of the intensity ratio. Finally, elemental concentration predictions are made by using the established internal standard model with modified spectral line intensity ratios. The method was tested on low alloy steel samples. In the experiment, the detection spectra were recorded for 9 days for quantitative analysis and drift correction of the major elements C, Si, Cr, Ni, Cu, and Mn in alloy steels. Compared with the uncalibrated internal standard method, for the prediction of unknown samples over a long period of time, the RMSE values of C, Si, Cr, Ni, Cu, and Mn decreased by 48.74%, 50.00%, 73.30%, 72.15%, 72.57%, and 18.23%, respectively, and the RSD decreased by 27.71%, 42.97%, 35.17%, 38.95%, 55.58%, and 23.40%, respectively. Furthermore, several typical drift correction methods were also studied for comparison, and the proposed method achieved the best results for different test sets.

Abstract Image

结合内标和主因子 PLS 提高 LIBS 测量的长期稳定性
提高长期稳定性是激光诱导击穿光谱(LIBS)大规模应用的一个重要问题。与实验室仪器不同,LIBS 仪器的许多应用都是在恶劣的室外环境中,仪器漂移会导致长期稳定性下降,从而阻碍了 LIBS 技术在高精度要求下的应用。在这项工作中,我们以设计的钢水 LIBS 传感器为基础,分析了不同日测量的光谱漂移问题,在此基础上提出了一种结合内标和显性因子偏最小二乘(PLS)回归的漂移校正方法。在该方法中,首先对光谱进行预处理,建立元素浓度比与光谱线强度比的内标模型。然后利用 PLS 回归在光谱强度和强度比漂移值之间构建一个校正模型。最后,利用已建立的内标模型和修正的光谱线强度比进行元素浓度预测。该方法在低合金钢样品上进行了测试。实验中记录了 9 天的检测光谱,对合金钢中的主要元素 C、Si、Cr、Ni、Cu 和 Mn 进行了定量分析和漂移校正。与未校准内标法相比,在长时间预测未知样品时,C、Si、Cr、Ni、Cu 和 Mn 的均方根误差分别降低了 48.74%、50.00%、73.30%、72.15%、72.57% 和 18.23%,RSD 分别降低了 27.71%、42.97%、35.17%、38.95%、55.58% 和 23.40%。此外,还对几种典型的漂移校正方法进行了比较研究,结果表明所提出的方法在不同的测试集上取得了最佳效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
26.50%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Innovative research on the fundamental theory and application of spectrometric techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信