Effect of mutanase and dextranase on biofilms of cariogenic bacteria: A systematic review of in vitro studies

IF 5.9 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Yumi C. Del Rey , Hian Parize , Sahar Assar , Gerd Göstemeyer , Sebastian Schlafer
{"title":"Effect of mutanase and dextranase on biofilms of cariogenic bacteria: A systematic review of in vitro studies","authors":"Yumi C. Del Rey ,&nbsp;Hian Parize ,&nbsp;Sahar Assar ,&nbsp;Gerd Göstemeyer ,&nbsp;Sebastian Schlafer","doi":"10.1016/j.bioflm.2024.100202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Matrix-degrading enzymes are promising non-biocidal adjuncts to dental biofilm control and caries prevention. By disrupting the biofilm matrix structure, enzymes may prevent biofilm formation or disperse established biofilms without compromising the microbial homeostasis in the mouth. This study reviewed whether treatment with mutanase and/or dextranase inhibits cariogenic biofilm growth and/or removes cariogenic biofilms <em>in vitro</em>. An electronic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and LIVIVO databases. Manual searches were performed to identify additional records. Studies that quantitatively measured the effect of mutanase and/or dextranase on the inhibition/removal of <em>in vitro</em> cariogenic biofilms were considered eligible for inclusion. Out of 809 screened records, 34 articles investigating the effect of dextranase (n = 23), mutanase (n = 10), and/or combined enzyme treatment (n = 7) were included in the review. The overall risk of bias of the included studies was moderate. Most investigations used simple biofilm models based on one or few bacterial species and employed treatment times ≥30 min. The current evidence suggests that mutanase and dextranase, applied as single or combined treatment, are able to both inhibit and remove <em>in vitro</em> cariogenic biofilms. The pooled data indicate that enzymes are more effective for biofilm inhibition than removal, and an overall higher effect of mutanase compared to dextranase was observed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55844,"journal":{"name":"Biofilm","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100202"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590207524000273/pdfft?md5=3184bd6bd7e4cb899319ea1aa2fd440a&pid=1-s2.0-S2590207524000273-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biofilm","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590207524000273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Matrix-degrading enzymes are promising non-biocidal adjuncts to dental biofilm control and caries prevention. By disrupting the biofilm matrix structure, enzymes may prevent biofilm formation or disperse established biofilms without compromising the microbial homeostasis in the mouth. This study reviewed whether treatment with mutanase and/or dextranase inhibits cariogenic biofilm growth and/or removes cariogenic biofilms in vitro. An electronic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and LIVIVO databases. Manual searches were performed to identify additional records. Studies that quantitatively measured the effect of mutanase and/or dextranase on the inhibition/removal of in vitro cariogenic biofilms were considered eligible for inclusion. Out of 809 screened records, 34 articles investigating the effect of dextranase (n = 23), mutanase (n = 10), and/or combined enzyme treatment (n = 7) were included in the review. The overall risk of bias of the included studies was moderate. Most investigations used simple biofilm models based on one or few bacterial species and employed treatment times ≥30 min. The current evidence suggests that mutanase and dextranase, applied as single or combined treatment, are able to both inhibit and remove in vitro cariogenic biofilms. The pooled data indicate that enzymes are more effective for biofilm inhibition than removal, and an overall higher effect of mutanase compared to dextranase was observed.

突变酶和葡聚糖酶对致癌细菌生物膜的影响:体外研究系统综述
基质降解酶是控制牙科生物膜和预防龋齿的很有前途的非杀菌辅助手段。通过破坏生物膜基质结构,酶可以防止生物膜形成或驱散已形成的生物膜,而不会损害口腔中的微生物平衡。本研究综述了在体外使用突变酶和/或葡聚糖酶是否能抑制致龋生物膜的生长和/或去除致龋生物膜。研究人员在 PubMed、EMBASE、Scopus、Web of Science、Cochrane 和 LIVIVO 数据库中进行了电子检索。此外,还进行了人工搜索以确定更多记录。对抑制/清除体外致龋生物膜的突变酶和/或葡聚糖酶效果进行定量测量的研究被认为符合纳入条件。在筛选出的 809 条记录中,有 34 篇研究葡聚糖酶(n = 23)、突变酶(n = 10)和/或联合酶处理(n = 7)效果的文章被纳入综述。所纳入研究的总体偏倚风险为中等。大多数研究使用了基于一种或几种细菌的简单生物膜模型,并采用了≥30 分钟的处理时间。目前的证据表明,突变酶和葡聚糖酶作为单一或联合疗法,能够抑制和清除体外致龋生物膜。汇总数据表明,酶抑制生物膜的效果比清除生物膜的效果更好,而且与葡聚糖酶相比,突变酶的总体效果更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biofilm
Biofilm MICROBIOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
1.50%
发文量
30
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信