{"title":"Vers une meilleure compréhension du trouble du développement intellectuel léger idiopathique : des symptômes aux modalités d’accompagnement","authors":"E. Gourlat, A.-C. Rattat, C.T. Albinet","doi":"10.1016/j.psfr.2024.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The present literature review aims to list as exhaustively as possible all the research studies carried out on MID (1) in terms of assessment and diagnosis, (2) in terms of clinical presentation and (3) from an interventional point of view. The objective is to provide keys to understand this pathology to the various health professionals in medical and paramedical fields.</div></div><div><h3>Literature findings</h3><div>Despite its high prevalence, there are few scientific studies about mild intellectual disability (MID), which causes cognitive deficits. MID is thought to affect about 1–2% of the population in France, and in nearly 80% of cases it is called idiopathic, the cause being unknown (<span><span>INSERM, 2016</span></span>).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Numerous studies have proposed interventional programs with specific recommendations for this population. Definite conclusions of the reviewed literature is complicated by important heterogeneity in the methodologies used and reported results, unclear clinical presentation of MID, and methodological difficulties in groups constitution and in objective evaluation of programs effects.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The objective is now to summarize these methodological requirements by proposing adaptations that take into account the cognitive and behavioral profile of individuals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":44717,"journal":{"name":"Psychologie Francaise","volume":"69 4","pages":"Pages 307-331"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychologie Francaise","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033298424000189","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
The present literature review aims to list as exhaustively as possible all the research studies carried out on MID (1) in terms of assessment and diagnosis, (2) in terms of clinical presentation and (3) from an interventional point of view. The objective is to provide keys to understand this pathology to the various health professionals in medical and paramedical fields.
Literature findings
Despite its high prevalence, there are few scientific studies about mild intellectual disability (MID), which causes cognitive deficits. MID is thought to affect about 1–2% of the population in France, and in nearly 80% of cases it is called idiopathic, the cause being unknown (INSERM, 2016).
Discussion
Numerous studies have proposed interventional programs with specific recommendations for this population. Definite conclusions of the reviewed literature is complicated by important heterogeneity in the methodologies used and reported results, unclear clinical presentation of MID, and methodological difficulties in groups constitution and in objective evaluation of programs effects.
Conclusion
The objective is now to summarize these methodological requirements by proposing adaptations that take into account the cognitive and behavioral profile of individuals.
期刊介绍:
Psychologie française is the official organ of Société française de psychologie. It publishes original articles, most of the time within thematic issues. Considered as a reference publication, which covers all fields of psychology, its contents are used for tuition.