Tracking health-related quality of life dynamics: Advances in ambulatory assessment methods

Johanna Löchner , Isaac Moshe , Günter Schiepek , Björn W. Schuller , Ramona Schoedel , Majid Rodgar , Katarzyna Wac , Lennart Seizer
{"title":"Tracking health-related quality of life dynamics: Advances in ambulatory assessment methods","authors":"Johanna Löchner ,&nbsp;Isaac Moshe ,&nbsp;Günter Schiepek ,&nbsp;Björn W. Schuller ,&nbsp;Ramona Schoedel ,&nbsp;Majid Rodgar ,&nbsp;Katarzyna Wac ,&nbsp;Lennart Seizer","doi":"10.1016/j.bbii.2024.100061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Assessing quality of life in clinical practice and research via patient-reported outcomes is an emerging practice enabling the assessment of individual well-being across different populations and conditions, such as immune-mediated and inflammatory disorders. Standardized questionnaires have traditionally been used for this purpose, but they have several limitations inherent to one-time snapshots from recall-based self-reports. Ambulatory measures may provide an alternative approach to assessing quality of life that allows capturing an individual’s states and behaviours in the context of daily life. In this overview article, we define ambulatory measures, including ecological momentary self-reports, wearable sensors, biochemical sampling, and smartphone sensing, that may be used to estimate quality of life, and present examples of studies that have used these measures. Additionally, we highlight the benefits of integrating multi-method ambulatory measures and overview methods for combining and analyzing them, including data fusion techniques and machine learning. While there are still challenges and limitations to overcome, the integration and application of ambulatory measures in medical research and clinical practice have the potential to provide a more comprehensive and accurate assessment of the quality of (everyday) life.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100197,"journal":{"name":"Brain Behavior and Immunity Integrative","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100061"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949834124000175/pdfft?md5=a667f137682b2b62f7aab58412a28e71&pid=1-s2.0-S2949834124000175-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Behavior and Immunity Integrative","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949834124000175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessing quality of life in clinical practice and research via patient-reported outcomes is an emerging practice enabling the assessment of individual well-being across different populations and conditions, such as immune-mediated and inflammatory disorders. Standardized questionnaires have traditionally been used for this purpose, but they have several limitations inherent to one-time snapshots from recall-based self-reports. Ambulatory measures may provide an alternative approach to assessing quality of life that allows capturing an individual’s states and behaviours in the context of daily life. In this overview article, we define ambulatory measures, including ecological momentary self-reports, wearable sensors, biochemical sampling, and smartphone sensing, that may be used to estimate quality of life, and present examples of studies that have used these measures. Additionally, we highlight the benefits of integrating multi-method ambulatory measures and overview methods for combining and analyzing them, including data fusion techniques and machine learning. While there are still challenges and limitations to overcome, the integration and application of ambulatory measures in medical research and clinical practice have the potential to provide a more comprehensive and accurate assessment of the quality of (everyday) life.

追踪与健康相关的生活质量动态:流动评估方法的进展
在临床实践和研究中,通过患者报告的结果来评估生活质量是一种新兴的做法,可以评估不同人群和不同病症(如免疫介导性疾病和炎症性疾病)的个人健康状况。传统上,标准化的调查问卷一直被用于这一目的,但这些调查问卷具有一些固有的局限性,因为它们是基于回忆的自我报告的一次性快照。非卧床测量可为评估生活质量提供另一种方法,它可以捕捉个人在日常生活中的状态和行为。在这篇综述文章中,我们定义了可用于评估生活质量的动态测量方法,包括生态瞬间自我报告、可穿戴传感器、生化采样和智能手机传感,并介绍了使用这些方法进行研究的实例。此外,我们还强调了整合多种方法的非卧床测量指标的好处,并概述了整合和分析这些指标的方法,包括数据融合技术和机器学习。虽然仍有一些挑战和限制需要克服,但在医学研究和临床实践中整合和应用非卧床测量方法有可能为(日常)生活质量提供更全面、更准确的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信