Economic analysis of buffer preparation strategy for single-use bioprocessing of monoclonal antibodies

Takao ITO , Ann-Kathrin Uebele , Takashi Nihei , Koichi Yamamoto , Naoto Watanabe , Yoshiyuki Tokieda , Masaki Okada
{"title":"Economic analysis of buffer preparation strategy for single-use bioprocessing of monoclonal antibodies","authors":"Takao ITO ,&nbsp;Ann-Kathrin Uebele ,&nbsp;Takashi Nihei ,&nbsp;Koichi Yamamoto ,&nbsp;Naoto Watanabe ,&nbsp;Yoshiyuki Tokieda ,&nbsp;Masaki Okada","doi":"10.1016/j.bioeco.2024.100065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The total cost of buffer preparation was analyzed for an existing single-use mAbs downstream processing facility. The cost effectiveness of outsourcing the liquid buffer as a ready-to-use and/or concentrate was examined by comparing a traditional made-in-house buffer from solid ingredients. The analysis show the combination of made-in-house buffer and concentrate buffer provides the greatest cost advantages. Ready-to-use buffers are more effective for improved facility footprint and provide cost benefits when in-house labor and consumables exceeds the cost of outsourcing. From the calculation of the cost of labor and number of pallets, although the difference in labor costs was small between the various buffer preparation methods, the use of concentrated buffers reduced both the total number of pallets and overall costs. When a new in-line dilution system is installed, a high facility utilization rate of at least ten preparations per year is required to leverage the cost savings from single-use consumables.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100394,"journal":{"name":"EFB Bioeconomy Journal","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100065"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266704102400003X/pdfft?md5=1e4aa2b60f5d76fef5970059e92fdafe&pid=1-s2.0-S266704102400003X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFB Bioeconomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266704102400003X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The total cost of buffer preparation was analyzed for an existing single-use mAbs downstream processing facility. The cost effectiveness of outsourcing the liquid buffer as a ready-to-use and/or concentrate was examined by comparing a traditional made-in-house buffer from solid ingredients. The analysis show the combination of made-in-house buffer and concentrate buffer provides the greatest cost advantages. Ready-to-use buffers are more effective for improved facility footprint and provide cost benefits when in-house labor and consumables exceeds the cost of outsourcing. From the calculation of the cost of labor and number of pallets, although the difference in labor costs was small between the various buffer preparation methods, the use of concentrated buffers reduced both the total number of pallets and overall costs. When a new in-line dilution system is installed, a high facility utilization rate of at least ten preparations per year is required to leverage the cost savings from single-use consumables.

单克隆抗体一次性生物处理缓冲液制备策略的经济性分析
对现有一次性使用 mAbs 下游加工设备的缓冲液制备总成本进行了分析。通过与传统的自制固体成分缓冲液进行比较,考察了外购即用型和/或浓缩型液体缓冲液的成本效益。分析表明,自制缓冲液和浓缩缓冲液的组合具有最大的成本优势。即用型缓冲剂在改善设备占地面积方面更为有效,当内部劳动力和耗材成本超过外包成本时,即用型缓冲剂可带来成本优势。从人工成本和托盘数量的计算来看,虽然各种缓冲液制备方法之间的人工成本差别不大,但使用浓缩缓冲液既减少了托盘总数,也降低了总体成本。在安装新的在线稀释系统时,需要有较高的设备利用率,每年至少进行十次制备,才能充分利用一次性耗材节省的成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信