Anxious youth and adults share threat-biased interpretations of linguistic and visual ambiguity: A proof of concept study

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Michelle Rozenman , Timothy D. Sweeny , Delaney C. McDonagh, Emily L. Jones, Anni Subar
{"title":"Anxious youth and adults share threat-biased interpretations of linguistic and visual ambiguity: A proof of concept study","authors":"Michelle Rozenman ,&nbsp;Timothy D. Sweeny ,&nbsp;Delaney C. McDonagh,&nbsp;Emily L. Jones,&nbsp;Anni Subar","doi":"10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Interpretation bias, or the threatening appraisal of ambiguous information, has been linked to anxiety disorder. Interpretation bias has been demonstrated for linguistic (e.g., evaluation of ambiguous sentences) and visual judgments (e.g., categorizing emotionally ambiguous facial expressions). It is unclear how these separate components of bias might be associated. We examined linguistic and visual interpretation biases in youth and emerging adults with (<em>n</em> = 44) and without (<em>n</em> = 40) anxiety disorder, and in youth-parent dyads (<em>n</em> = 40). Linguistic and visual biases were correlated with each other, and with anxiety. Compared to non-anxious participants, those with anxiety demonstrated stronger biases, and linguistic bias was especially predictive of anxiety symptoms and diagnosis. Age did not moderate these relationships. Parent linguistic bias was correlated with youth anxiety but not linguistic bias; parent and youth visual biases were correlated. Linguistic and visual interpretation biases are linked in clinically-anxious youth and emerging adults.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 102878"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887618524000549","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interpretation bias, or the threatening appraisal of ambiguous information, has been linked to anxiety disorder. Interpretation bias has been demonstrated for linguistic (e.g., evaluation of ambiguous sentences) and visual judgments (e.g., categorizing emotionally ambiguous facial expressions). It is unclear how these separate components of bias might be associated. We examined linguistic and visual interpretation biases in youth and emerging adults with (n = 44) and without (n = 40) anxiety disorder, and in youth-parent dyads (n = 40). Linguistic and visual biases were correlated with each other, and with anxiety. Compared to non-anxious participants, those with anxiety demonstrated stronger biases, and linguistic bias was especially predictive of anxiety symptoms and diagnosis. Age did not moderate these relationships. Parent linguistic bias was correlated with youth anxiety but not linguistic bias; parent and youth visual biases were correlated. Linguistic and visual interpretation biases are linked in clinically-anxious youth and emerging adults.

焦虑的青少年和成年人对语言和视觉模糊性的解释具有共同的威胁偏差:概念验证研究
解释偏差或对模棱两可信息的威胁性评价与焦虑症有关。语言(如评价模棱两可的句子)和视觉判断(如对情绪上模棱两可的面部表情进行分类)都存在解释偏差。目前还不清楚这些不同的偏差是如何联系在一起的。我们研究了患有焦虑症(44 人)和不患有焦虑症(40 人)的青少年和新成人以及青少年和父母二人组(40 人)的语言和视觉解释偏差。语言和视觉偏差相互关联,并与焦虑有关。与非焦虑症患者相比,焦虑症患者表现出更强的偏见,语言偏见尤其能预测焦虑症状和诊断。年龄并没有缓和这些关系。家长的语言偏见与青少年的焦虑相关,但与语言偏见无关;家长和青少年的视觉偏见相关。语言和视觉解释偏差与临床焦虑青少年和新成人有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anxiety Disorders is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes research papers on all aspects of anxiety disorders for individuals of all age groups, including children, adolescents, adults, and the elderly. Manuscripts that focus on disorders previously classified as anxiety disorders such as obsessive-compulsive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder, as well as the new category of illness anxiety disorder, are also within the scope of the journal. The research areas of focus include traditional, behavioral, cognitive, and biological assessment; diagnosis and classification; psychosocial and psychopharmacological treatment; genetics; epidemiology; and prevention. The journal welcomes theoretical and review articles that significantly contribute to current knowledge in the field. It is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Elsevier, BIOBASE, PubMed/Medline, PsycINFO, BIOSIS Citation Index, BRS Data, Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences, Pascal Francis, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信