Factors Associated with Adoption of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment for Advanced Melanoma: A SEER-Medicare Cohort Study

Cassandra Mohr , Kaiping Liao , Candice L. Hinkston , Mackenzie R. Wehner , Meng Li
{"title":"Factors Associated with Adoption of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment for Advanced Melanoma: A SEER-Medicare Cohort Study","authors":"Cassandra Mohr ,&nbsp;Kaiping Liao ,&nbsp;Candice L. Hinkston ,&nbsp;Mackenzie R. Wehner ,&nbsp;Meng Li","doi":"10.1016/j.xjidi.2024.100289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We aimed to explore the differences in immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) immunotherapy utilization for advanced melanoma by examining patient and neighborhood characteristics. We performed a retrospective cohort study using a deidentified, random sample of SEER-Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years with stage III or stage IV melanoma (2011–2017). Our primary outcome was initiation of ICI immunotherapy (ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, or atezolizumab) after stage III or stage IV melanoma diagnosis. We analyzed ICI usage with multivariable logistic regression. After analyzing the entire 2011–2017 cohort, we conducted a secondary analysis in which we separately analyzed the 2011–2014 and 2015–2017 cohorts to assess possible differences over time. We included 3531 beneficiaries, with mean follow-up of 2.1 (SD = 2.0) years. Higher likelihood of ICI usage was associated with male sex (OR = 1.21, 95% confidence interval = 1.04–1.42) and higher density of medical oncologists (OR = 1.02, 95% confidence interval = 1.01–1.04). Lower likelihood of ICI usage was associated with older age group and Charlson comorbidity score (score ≥2; OR = 0.72, 95% confidence interval = 0.60–0.86). These associations were diminished in more recent years (no association with sex, medical oncologist density, Charlson comorbidity score, and association with only the oldest age group in years 2015–2017). We found significant sex- and age-related differences in initiation among SEER-Medicare beneficiaries with stage III or stage IV melanoma, which appear to be improving over time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73548,"journal":{"name":"JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health","volume":"4 4","pages":"Article 100289"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667026724000365/pdfft?md5=9afd44e58671efdf3c0ed9288dd00f3c&pid=1-s2.0-S2667026724000365-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667026724000365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We aimed to explore the differences in immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) immunotherapy utilization for advanced melanoma by examining patient and neighborhood characteristics. We performed a retrospective cohort study using a deidentified, random sample of SEER-Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years with stage III or stage IV melanoma (2011–2017). Our primary outcome was initiation of ICI immunotherapy (ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, or atezolizumab) after stage III or stage IV melanoma diagnosis. We analyzed ICI usage with multivariable logistic regression. After analyzing the entire 2011–2017 cohort, we conducted a secondary analysis in which we separately analyzed the 2011–2014 and 2015–2017 cohorts to assess possible differences over time. We included 3531 beneficiaries, with mean follow-up of 2.1 (SD = 2.0) years. Higher likelihood of ICI usage was associated with male sex (OR = 1.21, 95% confidence interval = 1.04–1.42) and higher density of medical oncologists (OR = 1.02, 95% confidence interval = 1.01–1.04). Lower likelihood of ICI usage was associated with older age group and Charlson comorbidity score (score ≥2; OR = 0.72, 95% confidence interval = 0.60–0.86). These associations were diminished in more recent years (no association with sex, medical oncologist density, Charlson comorbidity score, and association with only the oldest age group in years 2015–2017). We found significant sex- and age-related differences in initiation among SEER-Medicare beneficiaries with stage III or stage IV melanoma, which appear to be improving over time.

采用免疫检查点抑制剂治疗晚期黑色素瘤的相关因素: SEER-医保队列研究
我们旨在通过研究患者和邻近地区的特征,探讨晚期黑色素瘤患者在使用免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)免疫疗法方面的差异。我们对年龄≥65岁、患有III期或IV期黑色素瘤的SEER-Medicare受益人(2011-2017年)进行了一次去身份化随机抽样的回顾性队列研究。我们的主要结果是在确诊为 III 期或 IV 期黑色素瘤后开始 ICI 免疫疗法(ipilimumab、pembrolizumab、nivolumab 或 atezolizumab)。我们通过多变量逻辑回归分析了 ICI 的使用情况。在分析了整个 2011-2017 年队列后,我们进行了二次分析,分别分析了 2011-2014 年队列和 2015-2017 年队列,以评估可能存在的时间差异。我们纳入了 3531 名受益人,平均随访时间为 2.1 年(SD = 2.0)。使用 ICI 的可能性较高与男性(OR = 1.21,95% 置信区间 = 1.04-1.42)和肿瘤内科医生密度较高(OR = 1.02,95% 置信区间 = 1.01-1.04)有关。使用 ICI 的可能性较低与年龄组和 Charlson 合并症评分(评分≥2;OR = 0.72,95% 置信区间 = 0.60-0.86)有关。这些关联在最近几年有所减弱(2015-2017年与性别、肿瘤内科医生密度、Charlson合并症评分均无关联,且仅与最年长年龄组有关)。我们发现,在患有 III 期或 IV 期黑色素瘤的 SEER-Medicare 受益人中,与性别和年龄相关的起始治疗差异明显,随着时间的推移,这种差异似乎正在改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信