Virtual simulation training for postpartum hemorrhage in low-to-moderate-volume hospitals in the US

Kathleen C. Minor MD , Katherine Bianco MD , Jonathan A. Mayo MPH , Gillian Abir MBChB , Amy E. Judy MD , Henry C. Lee MD , Stephanie A. Leonard PhD , Stephany Ayotte BScN , Laura C. Hedli MS , Kristen Schaffer MPH , Lillian Sie MPH , Kay Daniels MD
{"title":"Virtual simulation training for postpartum hemorrhage in low-to-moderate-volume hospitals in the US","authors":"Kathleen C. Minor MD ,&nbsp;Katherine Bianco MD ,&nbsp;Jonathan A. Mayo MPH ,&nbsp;Gillian Abir MBChB ,&nbsp;Amy E. Judy MD ,&nbsp;Henry C. Lee MD ,&nbsp;Stephanie A. Leonard PhD ,&nbsp;Stephany Ayotte BScN ,&nbsp;Laura C. Hedli MS ,&nbsp;Kristen Schaffer MPH ,&nbsp;Lillian Sie MPH ,&nbsp;Kay Daniels MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Maternal mortality in the United States is rising and many deaths are preventable. Emergencies, such as postpartum hemorrhage, occur less frequently in non-teaching, rural, and urban low-birth volume hospitals. There is an urgent need for accessible, evidence-based, and sustainable inter-professional education that creates the opportunity for clinical teams to practice their response to rare, but potentially devastating events.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the feasibility of virtual simulation training for the management of postpartum hemorrhage in low-to-moderate-volume delivery hospitals.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>The study occurred between December 2021 and March 2022 within 8 non-academic hospitals in the United States with low-to-moderate-delivery volumes, randomized to one of two models: direct simulation training and train-the-trainer. In the direct simulation training model, simulation faculty conducted a virtual simulation training program with participants. In the train-the-trainer model, simulation faculty conducted virtual lessons with new simulation instructors on how to prepare and conduct a simulation course. Following this training, the instructors led their own simulation training program at their respective hospitals. The direct simulation training participants and students trained by new instructors from the train-the-trainer program were evaluated with a multiple-choice questionnaire on postpartum hemorrhage knowledge and a confidence and attitude survey at 3 timepoints: prior to, immediately after, and at 3 months post-training. Paired t-tests were performed to assess for changes in knowledge and confidence within teaching models across time points. ANOVA was performed to test cross-sectionally for differences in knowledge and confidence between teaching models at each time point.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Direct simulation training participants (<em>n</em>=22) and students of the train-the-trainer instructors (<em>n</em>=18) included nurses, certified nurse midwives and attending physicians in obstetrics, family practice or anesthesiology. Mean pre-course knowledge and confidence scores were not statistically different between direct simulation participants and the students of the instructors from the train-the-trainer course (79%+/-13 versus 75%+/-14, respectively, <em>P-</em>value<em>=</em>.45). Within the direct simulation group, knowledge and confidence scores significantly improved from pre- to immediately post-training (knowledge score mean difference 9.81 [95% CI 3.23–16.40], <em>P-</em>value&lt;.01; confidence score mean difference 13.64 [95% CI 6.79–20.48], <em>P-</em>value&lt;.01), which were maintained 3-months post-training. Within the train-the-trainer group, knowledge and confidence scores immediate post-intervention were not significantly different compared with pre-course or 3-month post-course scores. Mean knowledge scores were significantly greater for the direct simulation group compared to the train-the-trainer group immediately post-training (89%+/-7 versus 74%+/-8, <em>P-</em>value&lt;.01) and at 3-months (88%+/-7 versus 76%+/-12, <em>P-</em>value&lt;.01). Comparisons between groups showed no difference in confidence and attitude scores at these timepoints. Both direct simulation participants and train-the-trainer instructors preferred virtual education, or a hybrid structure, over in-person education.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Virtual education for obstetric simulation training is feasible, acceptable, and effective. Utilizing a direct simulation model for postpartum hemorrhage management resulted in enhanced knowledge acquisition and retention compared to a train-the-trainer model.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72141,"journal":{"name":"AJOG global reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666577824000510/pdfft?md5=58189d6e7a09a2ace085a8bf1cd787b5&pid=1-s2.0-S2666577824000510-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOG global reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666577824000510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Maternal mortality in the United States is rising and many deaths are preventable. Emergencies, such as postpartum hemorrhage, occur less frequently in non-teaching, rural, and urban low-birth volume hospitals. There is an urgent need for accessible, evidence-based, and sustainable inter-professional education that creates the opportunity for clinical teams to practice their response to rare, but potentially devastating events.

Objective

To assess the feasibility of virtual simulation training for the management of postpartum hemorrhage in low-to-moderate-volume delivery hospitals.

Study design

The study occurred between December 2021 and March 2022 within 8 non-academic hospitals in the United States with low-to-moderate-delivery volumes, randomized to one of two models: direct simulation training and train-the-trainer. In the direct simulation training model, simulation faculty conducted a virtual simulation training program with participants. In the train-the-trainer model, simulation faculty conducted virtual lessons with new simulation instructors on how to prepare and conduct a simulation course. Following this training, the instructors led their own simulation training program at their respective hospitals. The direct simulation training participants and students trained by new instructors from the train-the-trainer program were evaluated with a multiple-choice questionnaire on postpartum hemorrhage knowledge and a confidence and attitude survey at 3 timepoints: prior to, immediately after, and at 3 months post-training. Paired t-tests were performed to assess for changes in knowledge and confidence within teaching models across time points. ANOVA was performed to test cross-sectionally for differences in knowledge and confidence between teaching models at each time point.

Results

Direct simulation training participants (n=22) and students of the train-the-trainer instructors (n=18) included nurses, certified nurse midwives and attending physicians in obstetrics, family practice or anesthesiology. Mean pre-course knowledge and confidence scores were not statistically different between direct simulation participants and the students of the instructors from the train-the-trainer course (79%+/-13 versus 75%+/-14, respectively, P-value=.45). Within the direct simulation group, knowledge and confidence scores significantly improved from pre- to immediately post-training (knowledge score mean difference 9.81 [95% CI 3.23–16.40], P-value<.01; confidence score mean difference 13.64 [95% CI 6.79–20.48], P-value<.01), which were maintained 3-months post-training. Within the train-the-trainer group, knowledge and confidence scores immediate post-intervention were not significantly different compared with pre-course or 3-month post-course scores. Mean knowledge scores were significantly greater for the direct simulation group compared to the train-the-trainer group immediately post-training (89%+/-7 versus 74%+/-8, P-value<.01) and at 3-months (88%+/-7 versus 76%+/-12, P-value<.01). Comparisons between groups showed no difference in confidence and attitude scores at these timepoints. Both direct simulation participants and train-the-trainer instructors preferred virtual education, or a hybrid structure, over in-person education.

Conclusion

Virtual education for obstetric simulation training is feasible, acceptable, and effective. Utilizing a direct simulation model for postpartum hemorrhage management resulted in enhanced knowledge acquisition and retention compared to a train-the-trainer model.

美国中低等医院产后出血虚拟模拟训练
背景美国的孕产妇死亡率正在上升,而许多死亡是可以预防的。产后出血等紧急情况在非教学医院、农村医院和城市低出生率医院发生的频率较低。研究设计该研究于 2021 年 12 月至 2022 年 3 月期间在美国 8 家中低分娩量的非教学医院进行,随机采用两种模式中的一种:直接模拟训练和培训员培训。在直接模拟训练模式中,模拟教师与参与者一起进行虚拟模拟训练。在 "培训培训师 "模式中,模拟教员为新的模拟教员提供虚拟课程,讲解如何准备和开展模拟课程。培训结束后,讲师们在各自的医院主持自己的模拟培训项目。在培训前、培训后和培训后 3 个月的 3 个时间点,对直接参加模拟培训的学员和由培训师培训项目的新讲师培训的学员进行了产后出血知识多项选择问卷以及信心和态度调查评估。采用配对 t 检验来评估不同时间点教学模式下知识和信心的变化。结果直接参加模拟培训的学员(22 人)和培训讲师的学生(18 人)包括护士、注册助产士和产科、家庭医生或麻醉科的主治医生。直接模拟参与者与培训培训师课程讲师的学生之间的课前知识和信心平均分没有统计学差异(分别为 79%+/-13 与 75%+/-14,P 值=0.45)。在直接模拟组中,知识和信心得分从培训前到培训后立即有了显著提高(知识得分平均差异为 9.81 [95% CI 3.23-16.40],P-value<.01;信心得分平均差异为 13.64 [95% CI 6.79-20.48],P-value<.01),并在培训后 3 个月保持不变。在培训培训师组中,干预后的知识和信心得分与培训前或培训后 3 个月的得分相比没有显著差异。与培训培训师组相比,直接模拟组的平均知识得分在培训后立即(89%+/-7 对 74%+/-8,P 值<.01)和 3 个月后(88%+/-7 对 76%+/-12,P 值<.01)明显更高。组间比较显示,在这些时间点上,信心和态度得分没有差异。与面对面教育相比,直接模拟参与者和培训讲师都更喜欢虚拟教育或混合结构。与培训培训师模式相比,利用直接模拟模式进行产后出血处理可提高知识获取和保留率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AJOG global reports
AJOG global reports Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Perinatology, Pediatrics and Child Health, Urology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信