Heterogeneity in suicide risk: Evidence from personalized dynamic models

IF 4.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Daniel D.L. Coppersmith , Evan M. Kleiman , Alexander J. Millner , Shirley B. Wang , Cara Arizmendi , Kate H. Bentley , Dylan DeMarco , Rebecca G. Fortgang , Kelly L. Zuromski , Joseph S. Maimone , Adam Haim , Jukka-Pekka Onnela , Suzanne A. Bird , Jordan W. Smoller , Patrick Mair , Matthew K. Nock
{"title":"Heterogeneity in suicide risk: Evidence from personalized dynamic models","authors":"Daniel D.L. Coppersmith ,&nbsp;Evan M. Kleiman ,&nbsp;Alexander J. Millner ,&nbsp;Shirley B. Wang ,&nbsp;Cara Arizmendi ,&nbsp;Kate H. Bentley ,&nbsp;Dylan DeMarco ,&nbsp;Rebecca G. Fortgang ,&nbsp;Kelly L. Zuromski ,&nbsp;Joseph S. Maimone ,&nbsp;Adam Haim ,&nbsp;Jukka-Pekka Onnela ,&nbsp;Suzanne A. Bird ,&nbsp;Jordan W. Smoller ,&nbsp;Patrick Mair ,&nbsp;Matthew K. Nock","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2024.104574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Most theories of suicide propose within-person changes in psychological states cause suicidal thoughts/behaviors; however, most studies use between-person analyses. Thus, there are little empirical data exploring current theories in the way they are hypothesized to occur. We used a form of statistical modeling called group iterative multiple model estimation (GIMME) to explore one theory of suicide: The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide (IPTS). GIMME estimates personalized statistical models for each individual and associations shared across individuals. Data were from a real-time monitoring study of individuals with a history of suicidal thoughts/behavior (adult sample: participants = 111, observations = 25,242; adolescent sample: participants = 145, observations = 26,182). Across both samples, none of theorized IPTS effects (i.e., contemporaneous effect from hopeless to suicidal thinking) were shared at the group level. There was significant heterogeneity in the personalized models, suggesting there are different pathways through which different people come to experience suicidal thoughts/behaviors. These findings highlight the complexity of suicide risk and the need for more personalized approaches to assessment and prediction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796724001013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most theories of suicide propose within-person changes in psychological states cause suicidal thoughts/behaviors; however, most studies use between-person analyses. Thus, there are little empirical data exploring current theories in the way they are hypothesized to occur. We used a form of statistical modeling called group iterative multiple model estimation (GIMME) to explore one theory of suicide: The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide (IPTS). GIMME estimates personalized statistical models for each individual and associations shared across individuals. Data were from a real-time monitoring study of individuals with a history of suicidal thoughts/behavior (adult sample: participants = 111, observations = 25,242; adolescent sample: participants = 145, observations = 26,182). Across both samples, none of theorized IPTS effects (i.e., contemporaneous effect from hopeless to suicidal thinking) were shared at the group level. There was significant heterogeneity in the personalized models, suggesting there are different pathways through which different people come to experience suicidal thoughts/behaviors. These findings highlight the complexity of suicide risk and the need for more personalized approaches to assessment and prediction.

自杀风险的异质性:个性化动态模型提供的证据
大多数自杀理论认为,人体内心理状态的变化会导致自杀想法/行为;然而,大多数研究采用的是人与人之间的分析。因此,目前很少有实证数据来探讨当前理论假设的发生方式。我们使用了一种名为群体迭代多重模型估计(GIMME)的统计建模形式来探索一种自杀理论:人际自杀理论(IPTS)。GIMME 可估算每个个体的个性化统计模型以及个体间共享的关联。数据来自一项对有自杀想法/行为史的人进行的实时监测研究(成人样本:参与者=111,观察次数=25242;青少年样本:参与者=145,观察次数=26182)。在这两个样本中,理论上的 IPTS 效应(即从无望到自杀想法的同期效应)在群体水平上都不存在。个性化模型中存在明显的异质性,这表明不同的人有不同的途径产生自杀想法/行为。这些发现凸显了自杀风险的复杂性,以及采用更加个性化的方法进行评估和预测的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Behaviour Research and Therapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.30%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The major focus of Behaviour Research and Therapy is an experimental psychopathology approach to understanding emotional and behavioral disorders and their prevention and treatment, using cognitive, behavioral, and psychophysiological (including neural) methods and models. This includes laboratory-based experimental studies with healthy, at risk and subclinical individuals that inform clinical application as well as studies with clinically severe samples. The following types of submissions are encouraged: theoretical reviews of mechanisms that contribute to psychopathology and that offer new treatment targets; tests of novel, mechanistically focused psychological interventions, especially ones that include theory-driven or experimentally-derived predictors, moderators and mediators; and innovations in dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices into clinical practice in psychology and associated fields, especially those that target underlying mechanisms or focus on novel approaches to treatment delivery. In addition to traditional psychological disorders, the scope of the journal includes behavioural medicine (e.g., chronic pain). The journal will not consider manuscripts dealing primarily with measurement, psychometric analyses, and personality assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信