Racial and ethnic inequities in spatial access to pharmacies: A geographic information system analysis

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Giovanni Appolon, Shangbin Tang, Nico Gabriel, Jasmine Morales, Lucas A. Berenbrok, Andrea Z. LaCroix, Jingchuan Guo, Walter S. Mathis, Inmaculada Hernandez
{"title":"Racial and ethnic inequities in spatial access to pharmacies: A geographic information system analysis","authors":"Giovanni Appolon,&nbsp;Shangbin Tang,&nbsp;Nico Gabriel,&nbsp;Jasmine Morales,&nbsp;Lucas A. Berenbrok,&nbsp;Andrea Z. LaCroix,&nbsp;Jingchuan Guo,&nbsp;Walter S. Mathis,&nbsp;Inmaculada Hernandez","doi":"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Pharmacy accessibility is crucial for equity in health care access because community pharmacists may reach individuals who do not have access to other health care providers.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective of this study was to determine whether spatial access to pharmacies differs among racial/ethnic groups across the rural-urban continuum.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We obtained a 30% random sample of the Research Triangle Institute synthetic population, sampled at the census block level. For each individual, we defined optimal pharmacy access as having a driving distance ≤2 miles to the closest pharmacy in urban counties, ≤5 miles in suburban counties, and ≤10 miles in rural counties. We used a logistic regression model to measure the association between race/ethnicity and pharmacy access, while controlling for racial/ethnic composition of the census tract, area deprivation index, income, age, gender, and U.S. region. The model included an interaction between race/ethnicity and urbanicity to evaluate whether racial/ethnic inequities differed across the rural-urban continuum.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The sample included 90,749,446 individuals of whom 80.6% had optimal pharmacy access. Racial/ethnic inequities in pharmacy access differed across the rural-urban continuum (<em>P</em> value for interaction= &lt;0.0001). In rural areas, Black (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.86-0.87), Hispanic (OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.79-0.80), and indigenous (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.47-0.48) individuals had lower odds of optimal pharmacy access, than White individuals. Hispanic (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.96-0.97) and Indigenous individuals (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.75-0.76) had lower odds of optimal pharmacy access compared to White individuals in suburban areas. In Western states, Asian had lower odds of optimal pharmacy access in suburban (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.86-0.90) and rural areas (OR 0.91; 95% CI 0.87-0.95) compared to White individuals.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Racial/ethnic inequities in spatial access to community pharmacies vary between urban and rural communities. Underrepresented racial/ethnic groups have significantly lower pharmacy access in rural and some suburban areas, but not in urban areas.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544319124001511","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Pharmacy accessibility is crucial for equity in health care access because community pharmacists may reach individuals who do not have access to other health care providers.

Objective

The objective of this study was to determine whether spatial access to pharmacies differs among racial/ethnic groups across the rural-urban continuum.

Methods

We obtained a 30% random sample of the Research Triangle Institute synthetic population, sampled at the census block level. For each individual, we defined optimal pharmacy access as having a driving distance ≤2 miles to the closest pharmacy in urban counties, ≤5 miles in suburban counties, and ≤10 miles in rural counties. We used a logistic regression model to measure the association between race/ethnicity and pharmacy access, while controlling for racial/ethnic composition of the census tract, area deprivation index, income, age, gender, and U.S. region. The model included an interaction between race/ethnicity and urbanicity to evaluate whether racial/ethnic inequities differed across the rural-urban continuum.

Results

The sample included 90,749,446 individuals of whom 80.6% had optimal pharmacy access. Racial/ethnic inequities in pharmacy access differed across the rural-urban continuum (P value for interaction= <0.0001). In rural areas, Black (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.86-0.87), Hispanic (OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.79-0.80), and indigenous (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.47-0.48) individuals had lower odds of optimal pharmacy access, than White individuals. Hispanic (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.96-0.97) and Indigenous individuals (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.75-0.76) had lower odds of optimal pharmacy access compared to White individuals in suburban areas. In Western states, Asian had lower odds of optimal pharmacy access in suburban (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.86-0.90) and rural areas (OR 0.91; 95% CI 0.87-0.95) compared to White individuals.

Conclusions

Racial/ethnic inequities in spatial access to community pharmacies vary between urban and rural communities. Underrepresented racial/ethnic groups have significantly lower pharmacy access in rural and some suburban areas, but not in urban areas.

种族和民族在药房使用空间上的不平等:地理信息系统分析
背景药房的可及性对于医疗保健服务的公平性至关重要,因为社区药剂师可能会接触到那些无法获得其他医疗保健服务提供者服务的人。方法我们从三角研究所合成人口中随机抽取了 30% 的样本,在人口普查区进行抽样。对于每个人,我们将最佳药房访问定义为:在市区县,距离最近药房的车程≤2 英里;在郊区县,距离最近药房的车程≤5 英里;在农村县,距离最近药房的车程≤10 英里。我们使用逻辑回归模型来衡量种族/民族与药房可及性之间的关系,同时控制人口普查区的种族/民族构成、地区贫困指数、收入、年龄、性别和美国地区。该模型包括种族/民族与城市化之间的交互作用,以评估种族/民族不平等现象在城乡之间是否存在差异。不同种族/人种在获得药房服务方面的不平等在城乡之间存在差异(交互作用的 P 值= <0.0001)。在农村地区,黑人(OR 0.87;95% CI 0.86-0.87)、西班牙裔(OR 0.80;95% CI 0.79-0.80)和原住民(OR 0.47;95% CI 0.47-0.48)获得最佳药房服务的几率低于白人。与郊区的白人相比,西班牙裔(OR 0.96;95% CI 0.96-0.97)和原住民(OR 0.75;95% CI 0.75-0.76)获得最佳药房服务的几率较低。在西部各州,与白人相比,亚裔在郊区(OR 0.88;95% CI 0.86-0.90)和农村地区(OR 0.91;95% CI 0.87-0.95)获得最佳药房服务的几率较低。在农村和一些郊区,代表性不足的种族/民族群体获得药房服务的机会明显较少,而在城市地区则不然。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
336
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Pharmacists Association is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Pharmacists Association (APhA), providing information on pharmaceutical care, drug therapy, diseases and other health issues, trends in pharmacy practice and therapeutics, informed opinion, and original research. JAPhA publishes original research, reviews, experiences, and opinion articles that link science to contemporary pharmacy practice to improve patient care.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信