Incorporating mitigation strategies in machine learning for landslide susceptibility prediction

IF 8.5 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Hai-Min Lyu , Zhen-Yu Yin , Pierre-Yves Hicher , Farid Laouafa
{"title":"Incorporating mitigation strategies in machine learning for landslide susceptibility prediction","authors":"Hai-Min Lyu ,&nbsp;Zhen-Yu Yin ,&nbsp;Pierre-Yves Hicher ,&nbsp;Farid Laouafa","doi":"10.1016/j.gsf.2024.101869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study proposes an approach that considers mitigation strategies in predicting landslide susceptibility through machine learning (ML) and geographic information system (GIS) techniques. ML models, such as random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), and support vector classification (SVC) are incorporated into GIS to predict landslide susceptibilities in Hong Kong. To consider the effect of mitigation strategies on landslide susceptibility, non-landslide samples were produced in the upgraded area and added to randomly created samples to serve as ML models in training datasets. Two scenarios were created to compare and demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed approach; Scenario I does not considering landslide control while Scenario II considers mitigation strategies for landslide control. The largest landslide susceptibilities are 0.967 (from RF), followed by 0.936 (from LR) and 0.902 (from SVC) in Scenario II; in Scenario I, they are 0.986 (from RF), 0.955 (from LR) and 0.947 (from SVC). This proves that the ML models considering mitigation strategies can decrease the current landslide susceptibilities. The comparison between the different ML models shows that RF performed better than LR and SVC, and provides the best prediction of the spatial distribution of landslide susceptibilities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12711,"journal":{"name":"Geoscience frontiers","volume":"15 5","pages":"Article 101869"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987124000938/pdfft?md5=5bd5722c3127a319f3478ae4465b0ace&pid=1-s2.0-S1674987124000938-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoscience frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987124000938","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study proposes an approach that considers mitigation strategies in predicting landslide susceptibility through machine learning (ML) and geographic information system (GIS) techniques. ML models, such as random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), and support vector classification (SVC) are incorporated into GIS to predict landslide susceptibilities in Hong Kong. To consider the effect of mitigation strategies on landslide susceptibility, non-landslide samples were produced in the upgraded area and added to randomly created samples to serve as ML models in training datasets. Two scenarios were created to compare and demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed approach; Scenario I does not considering landslide control while Scenario II considers mitigation strategies for landslide control. The largest landslide susceptibilities are 0.967 (from RF), followed by 0.936 (from LR) and 0.902 (from SVC) in Scenario II; in Scenario I, they are 0.986 (from RF), 0.955 (from LR) and 0.947 (from SVC). This proves that the ML models considering mitigation strategies can decrease the current landslide susceptibilities. The comparison between the different ML models shows that RF performed better than LR and SVC, and provides the best prediction of the spatial distribution of landslide susceptibilities.

Abstract Image

将缓解策略纳入机器学习,用于滑坡易发性预测
本研究提出了一种通过机器学习(ML)和地理信息系统(GIS)技术预测山体滑坡易发性的方法。将随机森林(RF)、逻辑回归(LR)和支持向量分类(SVC)等机器学习模型纳入地理信息系统,以预测香港的山体滑坡易发性。为考虑缓解策略对滑坡易发性的影响,在升级区域制作了非滑坡样本,并将其添加到随机创建的样本中,作为训练数据集中的 ML 模型。为比较和展示所提方法的效率,创建了两个方案:方案 I 不考虑滑坡控制,而方案 II 则考虑滑坡控制的缓解策略。在方案 II 中,最大的滑坡易发性为 0.967(来自 RF),其次是 0.936(来自 LR)和 0.902(来自 SVC);而在方案 I 中,最大的滑坡易发性为 0.986(来自 RF)、0.955(来自 LR)和 0.947(来自 SVC)。这证明,考虑了减灾策略的 ML 模型可以降低当前的滑坡易发性。不同 ML 模型之间的比较表明,RF 的性能优于 LR 和 SVC,对滑坡易发性的空间分布提供了最佳预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoscience frontiers
Geoscience frontiers Earth and Planetary Sciences-General Earth and Planetary Sciences
CiteScore
17.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
147
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Geoscience Frontiers (GSF) is the Journal of China University of Geosciences (Beijing) and Peking University. It publishes peer-reviewed research articles and reviews in interdisciplinary fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences. GSF covers various research areas including petrology and geochemistry, lithospheric architecture and mantle dynamics, global tectonics, economic geology and fuel exploration, geophysics, stratigraphy and paleontology, environmental and engineering geology, astrogeology, and the nexus of resources-energy-emissions-climate under Sustainable Development Goals. The journal aims to bridge innovative, provocative, and challenging concepts and models in these fields, providing insights on correlations and evolution.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信