Exploring SRL Differences: Science vs. Social Science Students in Soe, NTT

Qorry Dzikrina, Pujiriyanto Pujiriyanto, Yultari Ramadani, Marfath Dalouis Saekoko
{"title":"Exploring SRL Differences: Science vs. Social Science Students in Soe, NTT","authors":"Qorry Dzikrina, Pujiriyanto Pujiriyanto, Yultari Ramadani, Marfath Dalouis Saekoko","doi":"10.18415/ijmmu.v11i5.5669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the differences in Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) skills between 3rd-grade science and social studies students at SMA X Soe City, South Central Timor Regency. The total population for this study was 386 students, with a sample of 196 students from SMA X Kota Soe, South Central Timor Regency, determined using the Slovin formula. The sample was further divided into 94 science class students and 104 social studies class students. The Self-Regulated Learning questionnaire comprises 39 question items that have undergone validity testing and have been deemed valid. The questionnaire has a high reliability coefficient of 0.955. Science students exhibit a mean value of 116.4255 for Self-Regulated Learning skills, which is higher than the mean value of social studies students, which is only 107.9510. The data analysis technique employed was Independent Sample T-Test. The results per aspect of Self-Regulated Learning (Motivation, Metacognition, Behavior) suggest that science students outperformed social studies students, indicating a difference in Self-Regulated Learning between the two classes. It can be concluded that the level of Self-Regulated Learning is higher in the science class than in the social studies class.","PeriodicalId":505942,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding","volume":"3 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v11i5.5669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the differences in Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) skills between 3rd-grade science and social studies students at SMA X Soe City, South Central Timor Regency. The total population for this study was 386 students, with a sample of 196 students from SMA X Kota Soe, South Central Timor Regency, determined using the Slovin formula. The sample was further divided into 94 science class students and 104 social studies class students. The Self-Regulated Learning questionnaire comprises 39 question items that have undergone validity testing and have been deemed valid. The questionnaire has a high reliability coefficient of 0.955. Science students exhibit a mean value of 116.4255 for Self-Regulated Learning skills, which is higher than the mean value of social studies students, which is only 107.9510. The data analysis technique employed was Independent Sample T-Test. The results per aspect of Self-Regulated Learning (Motivation, Metacognition, Behavior) suggest that science students outperformed social studies students, indicating a difference in Self-Regulated Learning between the two classes. It can be concluded that the level of Self-Regulated Learning is higher in the science class than in the social studies class.
探索 SRL 差异:苏埃(NTT)的科学与社会科学学生
本研究探讨了帝汶中南部SMA X Soe市三年级科学和社会学学生在自我调节学习(SRL)技能方面的差异。本研究的总人数为 386 名学生,其中来自帝汶中南部地区 SMA X Kota Soe 市的 196 名学生样本由斯洛文公式确定。样本进一步分为 94 名科学班学生和 104 名社会学班学生。自我调节学习 "问卷由 39 个问题组成,经过有效性测试,被认为是有效的。问卷的信度系数高达 0.955。理科学生自我调节学习技能的平均值为 116.4255,高于社会科学生的平均值 107.9510。采用的数据分析技术是独立样本 T 检验。自我调节学习各方面(动机、元认知、行为)的结果表明,理科学生的自我调节学习能力高于社会科学生,表明两个班级在自我调节学习方面存在差异。由此可以得出结论,科学课学生的 "自我调节学习 "水平高于社会课学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信