Reflections of the EU Normative Agenda toward First and Second Russia-Chechen Conflicts

Md. Shafiqur Rahaman
{"title":"Reflections of the EU Normative Agenda toward First and Second Russia-Chechen Conflicts","authors":"Md. Shafiqur Rahaman","doi":"10.32996/jhsss.2024.6.5.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the decades, the normative approach has been considered as the decisive external policy gear of the EU. But, the limitation of the policy divulges its future application to an external country, promoting the question: Is the EU a normative power, or has it failed to implement its normative policy towards an external country? This paper aims to analyze the normative strategy of the EU and its constraints during the first and second Russia-Chechen conflicts. It investigated the EU normative policy regarding the conflicts and revealed the strategic chemistry of the EU-Russia relation, which fluctuated from time to time. It argues the EU normative discourses toward conflicts were sporadic in character and consisted of verbal and, at best, some written criticisms occasionally. Predominantly, The EU largely disregards the application of its normative values to the Chechen case; instead, it prioritizes its economic and bilateral relations with Russia. However, the 9/11 incident in the USA and the post 9/11 Russian hostage crisis developed the EU normative policy as a less important policy for Chechen conflicts.","PeriodicalId":431386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32996/jhsss.2024.6.5.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the decades, the normative approach has been considered as the decisive external policy gear of the EU. But, the limitation of the policy divulges its future application to an external country, promoting the question: Is the EU a normative power, or has it failed to implement its normative policy towards an external country? This paper aims to analyze the normative strategy of the EU and its constraints during the first and second Russia-Chechen conflicts. It investigated the EU normative policy regarding the conflicts and revealed the strategic chemistry of the EU-Russia relation, which fluctuated from time to time. It argues the EU normative discourses toward conflicts were sporadic in character and consisted of verbal and, at best, some written criticisms occasionally. Predominantly, The EU largely disregards the application of its normative values to the Chechen case; instead, it prioritizes its economic and bilateral relations with Russia. However, the 9/11 incident in the USA and the post 9/11 Russian hostage crisis developed the EU normative policy as a less important policy for Chechen conflicts.
欧盟规范议程对第一和第二次俄罗斯-车臣冲突的思考
几十年来,规范性方法一直被视为欧盟对外政策的决定性工具。但是,该政策的局限性决定了其未来在外部国家的应用,从而引发了这样一个问题:欧盟是一个规范性大国,还是未能对外部国家实施其规范性政策?欧盟是一个规范性大国,还是未能对一个外部国家实施其规范性政策?本文旨在分析第一次和第二次俄罗斯-车臣冲突期间欧盟的规范性战略及其制约因素。它调查了欧盟对冲突的规范性政策,揭示了欧盟与俄罗斯关系的战略化学反应,这种反应时有波动。报告认为,欧盟对冲突的规范性论述是零星的,包括口头批评,充其量只是偶尔的一些书面批评。主要而言,欧盟在很大程度上忽视了将其规范价值应用于车臣问题;相反,欧盟优先考虑的是与俄罗斯的经济和双边关系。然而,美国的 9/11 事件和 9/11 后的俄罗斯人质危机使欧盟的规范政策在车臣冲突中变得不那么重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信