Pole Dancing-Specific Muscle Strength: Development and Reliability of a Novel Assessment Protocol

IF 2.3 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Despoina Ignatoglou, Achilleas Paliouras, E. Paraskevopoulos, N. Strimpakos, Paraskevi Bilika, Maria Papandreou, Eleni Kapreli
{"title":"Pole Dancing-Specific Muscle Strength: Development and Reliability of a Novel Assessment Protocol","authors":"Despoina Ignatoglou, Achilleas Paliouras, E. Paraskevopoulos, N. Strimpakos, Paraskevi Bilika, Maria Papandreou, Eleni Kapreli","doi":"10.3390/mps7030044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pole dancing is a physically demanding sport that combines dance and acrobatic movements on a vertical pole. Despite its highly growing popularity, there is currently limited research in the field. The aim of this study was to create and evaluate a strength assessment protocol for athletes in pole dancing, with a specific focus on functional positions on the pole. Methods: Thirty-two female pole dancing athletes participated in this study. Maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC) were measured at three different sport-specific positions on the pole (shoulder abduction and adduction, and hip adduction), on two separate days (test and re-test) with a five to seven day interval between them. A hand-held dynamometer (Activ5- Activbody) stabilized on the pole was used for this study. Results: The intra-session reliability was good to excellent for all sports-specific positions and for both sides of the body, across all different movements (ICC = 0.837–0.960, SEM = 5.02Kg-2.24Kg, and SDD = 27.46%-14.92%). Slightly better results were found regarding inter-session reliability (ICC = 0.927–0.970, SEM = 3.72Kg-1.97Kg, and SDD = 22.86%-15.19%). There was not a statistically significant difference between the MVICs between the left and right or dominant and non-dominant side in shoulder abduction (p = 0.105) and hip adduction (p = 0.282), in contrast to shoulder adduction (p = 0.00). Conclusion: The strength assessment protocol developed in the current study has proven to be a reliable and functional tool, with the potential for utilization in clinical practice as part of objective strength testing. Further studies are needed in order to expand the protocol to other muscle groups and positions and to generalize the results in all pole dancing populations such as male athletes.","PeriodicalId":18715,"journal":{"name":"Methods and Protocols","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods and Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/mps7030044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pole dancing is a physically demanding sport that combines dance and acrobatic movements on a vertical pole. Despite its highly growing popularity, there is currently limited research in the field. The aim of this study was to create and evaluate a strength assessment protocol for athletes in pole dancing, with a specific focus on functional positions on the pole. Methods: Thirty-two female pole dancing athletes participated in this study. Maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC) were measured at three different sport-specific positions on the pole (shoulder abduction and adduction, and hip adduction), on two separate days (test and re-test) with a five to seven day interval between them. A hand-held dynamometer (Activ5- Activbody) stabilized on the pole was used for this study. Results: The intra-session reliability was good to excellent for all sports-specific positions and for both sides of the body, across all different movements (ICC = 0.837–0.960, SEM = 5.02Kg-2.24Kg, and SDD = 27.46%-14.92%). Slightly better results were found regarding inter-session reliability (ICC = 0.927–0.970, SEM = 3.72Kg-1.97Kg, and SDD = 22.86%-15.19%). There was not a statistically significant difference between the MVICs between the left and right or dominant and non-dominant side in shoulder abduction (p = 0.105) and hip adduction (p = 0.282), in contrast to shoulder adduction (p = 0.00). Conclusion: The strength assessment protocol developed in the current study has proven to be a reliable and functional tool, with the potential for utilization in clinical practice as part of objective strength testing. Further studies are needed in order to expand the protocol to other muscle groups and positions and to generalize the results in all pole dancing populations such as male athletes.
钢管舞专用肌力:新型评估方案的开发与可靠性
背景介绍钢管舞是一项耗费体力的运动,它将舞蹈和杂技动作结合在一根垂直的钢管上。尽管钢管舞越来越受欢迎,但目前该领域的研究却十分有限。本研究的目的是为钢管舞运动员制定并评估一项力量评估方案,重点关注钢管上的功能性姿势。研究方法32 名女性钢管舞运动员参与了这项研究。在钢管上三个不同的运动特定位置(肩部外展、内收和髋部内收)测量最大自主等长收缩(MVIC),分别在两天内进行(测试和复测),中间间隔五到七天。本研究使用的是稳定在杆上的手持式测力计(Activ5- Activbody)。研究结果对于所有运动特定姿势和身体两侧的所有不同动作,会期内的可靠性都达到了良好至优秀(ICC = 0.837-0.960,SEM = 5.02千克-2.24千克,SDD = 27.46%-14.92%)。两次测验之间的可靠性稍好一些(ICC = 0.927-0.970, SEM = 3.72Kg-1.97Kg, SDD = 22.86%-15.19%)。在肩关节外展(p = 0.105)和髋关节内收(p = 0.282)方面,左右侧或优势侧与非优势侧的 MVICs 之间没有统计学意义上的显著差异,而肩关节内收(p = 0.00)则相反。结论当前研究中开发的力量评估方案已被证明是一种可靠且实用的工具,有望在临床实践中作为客观力量测试的一部分加以应用。还需要进一步研究,以便将该方案扩展到其他肌肉群和位置,并将结果推广到所有钢管舞人群,如男性运动员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Methods and Protocols
Methods and Protocols Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信