Conflict Transformation in South Omo Zone Pastoralist and Agro-Pastoralist Community of Ethiopia

Asmare Shetahun Alemneh
{"title":"Conflict Transformation in South Omo Zone Pastoralist and Agro-Pastoralist Community of Ethiopia","authors":"Asmare Shetahun Alemneh","doi":"10.33002/pp0202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores conflict transformation practices and actors through an analytical research approach. It reveals that various actors engaged in conflict and peace initiatives have primarily focused on activities cantered around conflict management, prevention, and resolution. This limited emphasis on conflict transformation is attributed to a lack of governmental attention to strategic planning in this regard. Sources of conflict identified include grievances, animal raiding, land disputes, fishing rights, and competition over water and pasture resources. Efforts aimed at conflict transformation encompass resilience-building, rangeland management, NGO interventions in peace dialogues, integration of pastoralism and agro-pastoralism with commercial agriculture, implementation of drought and conflict early warning systems, water resource management and development, range land rehabilitation, and provision of education to affected communities. While these activities have played a significant role in addressing conflicts and transforming relationships, they are deemed insufficient and inadequately executed for comprehensive conflict transformation. Nonetheless, they serve as vital drivers of peace. Although the current conflict transformation mechanisms in place have not resulted in significant changes in the conflict situation, the beginnings are promising and commendable. The government and other stakeholders are urged to engage in proactive conflict intervention mechanisms to effectuate conflict transformation and foster peace or mitigate its adverse impacts. Furthermore, the study advocates for the provision of informal peace education to all adult community members, with the possibility of formalizing this education as an existing conflict transformation option.","PeriodicalId":162444,"journal":{"name":"Pastures & Pastoralism","volume":"94 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pastures & Pastoralism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33002/pp0202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores conflict transformation practices and actors through an analytical research approach. It reveals that various actors engaged in conflict and peace initiatives have primarily focused on activities cantered around conflict management, prevention, and resolution. This limited emphasis on conflict transformation is attributed to a lack of governmental attention to strategic planning in this regard. Sources of conflict identified include grievances, animal raiding, land disputes, fishing rights, and competition over water and pasture resources. Efforts aimed at conflict transformation encompass resilience-building, rangeland management, NGO interventions in peace dialogues, integration of pastoralism and agro-pastoralism with commercial agriculture, implementation of drought and conflict early warning systems, water resource management and development, range land rehabilitation, and provision of education to affected communities. While these activities have played a significant role in addressing conflicts and transforming relationships, they are deemed insufficient and inadequately executed for comprehensive conflict transformation. Nonetheless, they serve as vital drivers of peace. Although the current conflict transformation mechanisms in place have not resulted in significant changes in the conflict situation, the beginnings are promising and commendable. The government and other stakeholders are urged to engage in proactive conflict intervention mechanisms to effectuate conflict transformation and foster peace or mitigate its adverse impacts. Furthermore, the study advocates for the provision of informal peace education to all adult community members, with the possibility of formalizing this education as an existing conflict transformation option.
埃塞俄比亚南奥莫区牧民和农牧民社区的冲突转化
本研究通过分析研究方法探讨了冲突转化的做法和参与者。研究显示,参与冲突与和平倡议的各行为体主要关注围绕冲突管理、预防和解决开展的活动。之所以对冲突转化的重视程度有限,是因为政府对这方面的战略规划缺乏关注。已查明的冲突根源包括不满情绪、抢夺动物、土地纠纷、捕鱼权以及对水源和牧场资源的争夺。旨在转化冲突的努力包括复原力建设、牧场管理、非政府组织在和平对话中的干预、将畜牧业和农牧业与商业农业相结合、实施干旱和冲突预警系统、水资源管理和开发、牧场土地恢复以及为受影响社区提供教育。虽然这些活动在解决冲突和转变关系方面发挥了重要作用,但它们被认为不足以实现全面的冲突转变,也没有得到充分执行。尽管如此,它们仍是和平的重要推动力。尽管目前实施的冲突转化机制尚未使冲突局势发生重大变化,但其开端是充满希望和值得称赞的。研究敦促政府和其他利益攸关方参与积极的冲突干预机制,以实现冲突转化,促进和平或减轻其不利影响。此外,本研究还主张向所有成年社区成员提供非正式和平教育,并有可能将这种教育正式化,作为现有的冲突转化方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信