Effects of botulinum toxin type A in patients with painful temporomandibular joint disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Mengjiao Zhu, Ziwei Huang, Yeye Wang, Jing Qin, Mingyue Fan
{"title":"Effects of botulinum toxin type A in patients with painful temporomandibular joint disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Mengjiao Zhu, Ziwei Huang, Yeye Wang, Jing Qin, Mingyue Fan","doi":"10.1097/ms9.0000000000002183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n To assess the therapeutic efficacy of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) for managing myofascial pain related to temporomandibular disorders (TMDs).\n \n \n \n This study was conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 statement guidelines. The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The primary outcome was pain score on the visual analogue scale (VAS), and the secondary outcomes were maximum mouth opening (MMO) and adverse effects. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess risk bias. A meta-analysis of studies with the same interventions, controls, assessment methods and follow-up durations was performed.\n \n \n \n A total of 519 studies were retrieved, of which 20 RCTs were included in the qualitative analysis and 6 were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that, compared with placebo, BTX-A injection was more effective at relieving myofascial pain, and its effect was similar to that of conventional methods. However, there was no difference in MMO between the two groups. After study assessment with the RoB 2.0 tool, six studies showed a low risk of bias, 13 studies showed some concerns regarding the reported results, and only one study showed a high risk of bias. Adverse effects of BTX-A injection were observed in four studies.\n \n \n \n In conclusion, BTX-A is effective at relieving pain in TMD patients but does not improve mouth opening. To minimize adverse effects, we recommend a low dose of BTX-A for TMD patients who do not experience complete pain relief from conservative treatments.\n","PeriodicalId":373451,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Medicine & Surgery","volume":"26 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Medicine & Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ms9.0000000000002183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To assess the therapeutic efficacy of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) for managing myofascial pain related to temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). This study was conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 statement guidelines. The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The primary outcome was pain score on the visual analogue scale (VAS), and the secondary outcomes were maximum mouth opening (MMO) and adverse effects. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess risk bias. A meta-analysis of studies with the same interventions, controls, assessment methods and follow-up durations was performed. A total of 519 studies were retrieved, of which 20 RCTs were included in the qualitative analysis and 6 were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that, compared with placebo, BTX-A injection was more effective at relieving myofascial pain, and its effect was similar to that of conventional methods. However, there was no difference in MMO between the two groups. After study assessment with the RoB 2.0 tool, six studies showed a low risk of bias, 13 studies showed some concerns regarding the reported results, and only one study showed a high risk of bias. Adverse effects of BTX-A injection were observed in four studies. In conclusion, BTX-A is effective at relieving pain in TMD patients but does not improve mouth opening. To minimize adverse effects, we recommend a low dose of BTX-A for TMD patients who do not experience complete pain relief from conservative treatments.
A 型肉毒毒素对颞下颌关节疼痛患者的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的:评估 A 型肉毒毒素(BTX-A)治疗与颞下颌关节紊乱症(TMD)相关的肌筋膜疼痛的疗效。 本研究根据 PRISMA 2020 声明指南进行。研究人员检索了 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库。仅纳入了随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结果是视觉模拟量表(VAS)上的疼痛评分,次要结果是最大张口量(MMO)和不良反应。科克伦偏倚风险工具用于评估偏倚风险。对具有相同干预、对照、评估方法和随访时间的研究进行了荟萃分析。 共检索到 519 项研究,其中 20 项研究被纳入定性分析,6 项研究被纳入荟萃分析。结果显示,与安慰剂相比,BTX-A 注射能更有效地缓解肌筋膜疼痛,其效果与传统方法相似。不过,两组患者的肌筋膜疼痛程度并无差异。使用 RoB 2.0 工具对研究进行评估后,6 项研究显示偏倚风险较低,13 项研究显示报告结果存在一些问题,只有一项研究显示偏倚风险较高。有四项研究观察到了注射 BTX-A 的不良反应。 总之,BTX-A 能有效缓解 TMD 患者的疼痛,但不能改善张口情况。为了将不良反应降至最低,我们建议保守治疗后疼痛仍未完全缓解的 TMD 患者使用小剂量的 BTX-A。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信