STUDY OF ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE AT REGIONAL LEVEL

O.A. Lutsenko, G. Ostrovska, Yu.M. Lavrenyuk, T.A. Petrova, R.V. Lutsenko
{"title":"STUDY OF ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE AT REGIONAL LEVEL","authors":"O.A. Lutsenko, G. Ostrovska, Yu.M. Lavrenyuk, T.A. Petrova, R.V. Lutsenko","doi":"10.31718/2077-1096.24.2.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The introduction of antibiotics revolutionized medicine, dramatically reducing deaths and illnesses caused by infections. However, decades of overuse have accelerated the evolution of microorganisms, leading to a critical challenge: antibiotic resistance. This research aims to investigate the regional risk factors contributing to antibiotic resistance among the Poltava region population. \nMaterials and methods. 100 patients of the 2nd Municipal Clinical Hospital and the Regional (Republican) Center for Emergency Medical Aid and Disaster Medicine of Poltava were included in the study. Data collection was carried out from November 2023 to March 2024. Patients were offered a series of 11 questions. \nResearch results. This study has revealed the following antibiotic usage patterns among the residents of the Poltava region. It has been found that 22% of respondents are currently undergoing treatment, 8% in the last month, 36% in the last year, and 34% of the respondents tool the treatment for more than a year. When using antibiotics without a prescription, 30% of patients consulted a pharmacy, 52% trusted the Internet, 10% chose the cheapest medicine, and 8% followed advertisements. For subsequent illnesses, 76% of respondents used antibiotics they had taken before: amoxicillin (42%), ciprofloxacin (28%), azithromycin (22%), and chloramphenicol (8%). While 80% reported following prescribed antibiotic regimens, 20% interrupted treatment prematurely due to perceived improvement. Despite 84% acknowledging the importance of completing antibiotic courses, a concerning 16% were unaware of this crucial practice. Interestingly, 11% reported using antibiotics for preventive purposes (before getting sick). However, a positive trend emerged: 85% of respondents confirmed undergoing testing for bacterial susceptibility before receiving antibiotics. Only 9% reported amoxicillin as ineffective. When antibiotics were ineffective, 46% of respondents consulted a doctor, 24% took no action and waited for the antibiotic to take effect, 21% stopped one antibiotic and started another, and 14% preferred intramuscular injections and self-medication. \nConclusion. A significant number of patients (48%) take antibacterial drugs without a doctor's prescription and 52% search for information on the Internet. 76% of patients use the same drug for a recurrent disease. Amoxicillin is the most often preferred (42%), a smaller number of patients came to the pharmacy for ciprofloxacin (28%), 22% of respondents preferred azithromycin. This study underscores the necessity for public health interventions to tackle antibiotic misuse and misconceptions in the Poltava region. Promoting responsible usage, emphasizing the importance of completing treatment courses, and discouraging self-medication are crucial steps in combating the growing threat of antibiotic resistance.","PeriodicalId":24028,"journal":{"name":"Актуальні проблеми сучасної медицини: Вісник Української медичної стоматологічної академії","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Актуальні проблеми сучасної медицини: Вісник Української медичної стоматологічної академії","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31718/2077-1096.24.2.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The introduction of antibiotics revolutionized medicine, dramatically reducing deaths and illnesses caused by infections. However, decades of overuse have accelerated the evolution of microorganisms, leading to a critical challenge: antibiotic resistance. This research aims to investigate the regional risk factors contributing to antibiotic resistance among the Poltava region population. Materials and methods. 100 patients of the 2nd Municipal Clinical Hospital and the Regional (Republican) Center for Emergency Medical Aid and Disaster Medicine of Poltava were included in the study. Data collection was carried out from November 2023 to March 2024. Patients were offered a series of 11 questions. Research results. This study has revealed the following antibiotic usage patterns among the residents of the Poltava region. It has been found that 22% of respondents are currently undergoing treatment, 8% in the last month, 36% in the last year, and 34% of the respondents tool the treatment for more than a year. When using antibiotics without a prescription, 30% of patients consulted a pharmacy, 52% trusted the Internet, 10% chose the cheapest medicine, and 8% followed advertisements. For subsequent illnesses, 76% of respondents used antibiotics they had taken before: amoxicillin (42%), ciprofloxacin (28%), azithromycin (22%), and chloramphenicol (8%). While 80% reported following prescribed antibiotic regimens, 20% interrupted treatment prematurely due to perceived improvement. Despite 84% acknowledging the importance of completing antibiotic courses, a concerning 16% were unaware of this crucial practice. Interestingly, 11% reported using antibiotics for preventive purposes (before getting sick). However, a positive trend emerged: 85% of respondents confirmed undergoing testing for bacterial susceptibility before receiving antibiotics. Only 9% reported amoxicillin as ineffective. When antibiotics were ineffective, 46% of respondents consulted a doctor, 24% took no action and waited for the antibiotic to take effect, 21% stopped one antibiotic and started another, and 14% preferred intramuscular injections and self-medication. Conclusion. A significant number of patients (48%) take antibacterial drugs without a doctor's prescription and 52% search for information on the Internet. 76% of patients use the same drug for a recurrent disease. Amoxicillin is the most often preferred (42%), a smaller number of patients came to the pharmacy for ciprofloxacin (28%), 22% of respondents preferred azithromycin. This study underscores the necessity for public health interventions to tackle antibiotic misuse and misconceptions in the Poltava region. Promoting responsible usage, emphasizing the importance of completing treatment courses, and discouraging self-medication are crucial steps in combating the growing threat of antibiotic resistance.
地区抗生素耐药性研究
抗生素的问世彻底改变了医学,大大减少了因感染而导致的死亡和疾病。然而,数十年的过度使用加速了微生物的进化,导致了一个严峻的挑战:抗生素耐药性。本研究旨在调查导致波尔塔瓦地区人口产生抗生素耐药性的地区风险因素。材料与方法100 名波尔塔瓦市第二临床医院和地区(共和国)紧急医疗援助和灾难医学中心的患者被纳入研究范围。数据收集工作于 2023 年 11 月至 2024 年 3 月进行。向患者提出了一系列共 11 个问题。研究结果。这项研究揭示了波尔塔瓦州居民使用抗生素的模式。调查发现,22%的受访者目前正在接受治疗,8%的受访者在上个月接受治疗,36%的受访者在去年接受治疗,34%的受访者使用治疗工具的时间超过一年。在没有处方的情况下使用抗生素时,30% 的患者咨询药店,52% 相信互联网,10% 选择最便宜的药物,8% 遵循广告。在随后的疾病中,76% 的受访者使用了以前服用过的抗生素:阿莫西林(42%)、环丙沙星(28%)、阿奇霉素(22%)和氯霉素(8%)。80%的患者表示遵照处方使用抗生素,20%的患者因认为病情有所好转而过早中断治疗。尽管 84% 的人承认完成抗生素疗程的重要性,但仍有 16% 的人没有意识到这一重要做法。有趣的是,有 11% 的人表示使用抗生素是出于预防目的(在生病之前)。然而,一个积极的趋势出现了:85% 的受访者确认在接受抗生素治疗前进行了细菌药敏试验。只有 9% 的受访者表示阿莫西林无效。当抗生素无效时,46% 的受访者会咨询医生,24% 的受访者不采取任何措施,等待抗生素生效,21% 的受访者停止使用一种抗生素并开始使用另一种抗生素,14% 的受访者选择肌肉注射和自行用药。结论相当多的患者(48%)在没有医生处方的情况下服用抗菌药物,52%的患者在互联网上搜索相关信息。76%的患者使用同一种药物治疗反复发作的疾病。阿莫西林是最常见的首选药物(42%),来药房购买环丙沙星的患者人数较少(28%),22%的受访者首选阿奇霉素。这项研究强调了在波尔塔瓦州采取公共卫生干预措施解决抗生素滥用和误解问题的必要性。提倡负责任地使用抗生素、强调完成疗程的重要性以及阻止自行用药是应对日益严重的抗生素耐药性威胁的关键步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信