On the linear viscoelastic behavior of semidilute polydisperse bubble suspensions in Newtonian media

IF 3 2区 工程技术 Q2 MECHANICS
Stamatina Mitrou, S. Migliozzi, Luca Mazzei, P. Angeli
{"title":"On the linear viscoelastic behavior of semidilute polydisperse bubble suspensions in Newtonian media","authors":"Stamatina Mitrou, S. Migliozzi, Luca Mazzei, P. Angeli","doi":"10.1122/8.0000745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work, we investigated the linear viscoelasticity of semidilute polydisperse bubble suspensions via small amplitude oscillatory shear (SAOS) tests performed in a rheo-optical setup. For all tested suspensions, the measured viscoelastic moduli (G′, G″) aligned with the theoretical predictions of the Jeffreys model for average dynamic capillary numbers (⟨Cd⟩) greater than unity. But at lower ⟨Cd⟩ values, experimental G′ values exceeded theoretical predictions. To investigate this, we considered the effects of suspension polydispersity and various SAOS measurement artifacts, including bubble rise, coalescence, and changes in suspension microstructure over time. Polydispersity could not cause the observed deviation, because the viscoelastic trends deviate from those of classic single-mode relaxation only for bimodal bubble size distributions with equal volume fractions of very small and very large bubbles; in any other case, the polydisperse suspension behaves as monodisperse with a bubble radius equal to the volume-weighted mean radius. Furthermore, bubble rise proved to play a minor role, while SAOS rheo-optical experiments revealed that bubble size and organization varied negligibly during our measurements. The G′ deviation at low ⟨Cd⟩ values was linked to bubble fluid dynamic interactions induced by the bubble spatial distribution. Image analysis showed that at low bubble volume fractions, stronger and prolonged preshearing reduces these interactions by increasing the average interbubble distance. But this effect is negligible in denser suspensions, which show similar G′ trends for any applied preshearing. Finally, a multimode Jeffreys model fitted to the experimental data showed that bubble interactions complicate the relaxation process, introducing multiple relaxation modes.","PeriodicalId":16991,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rheology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rheology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1122/8.0000745","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this work, we investigated the linear viscoelasticity of semidilute polydisperse bubble suspensions via small amplitude oscillatory shear (SAOS) tests performed in a rheo-optical setup. For all tested suspensions, the measured viscoelastic moduli (G′, G″) aligned with the theoretical predictions of the Jeffreys model for average dynamic capillary numbers (⟨Cd⟩) greater than unity. But at lower ⟨Cd⟩ values, experimental G′ values exceeded theoretical predictions. To investigate this, we considered the effects of suspension polydispersity and various SAOS measurement artifacts, including bubble rise, coalescence, and changes in suspension microstructure over time. Polydispersity could not cause the observed deviation, because the viscoelastic trends deviate from those of classic single-mode relaxation only for bimodal bubble size distributions with equal volume fractions of very small and very large bubbles; in any other case, the polydisperse suspension behaves as monodisperse with a bubble radius equal to the volume-weighted mean radius. Furthermore, bubble rise proved to play a minor role, while SAOS rheo-optical experiments revealed that bubble size and organization varied negligibly during our measurements. The G′ deviation at low ⟨Cd⟩ values was linked to bubble fluid dynamic interactions induced by the bubble spatial distribution. Image analysis showed that at low bubble volume fractions, stronger and prolonged preshearing reduces these interactions by increasing the average interbubble distance. But this effect is negligible in denser suspensions, which show similar G′ trends for any applied preshearing. Finally, a multimode Jeffreys model fitted to the experimental data showed that bubble interactions complicate the relaxation process, introducing multiple relaxation modes.
关于牛顿介质中半稀释多分散气泡悬浮液的线性粘弹性行为
在这项工作中,我们通过在流变光学装置中进行的小振幅振荡剪切(SAOS)测试,研究了半稀释多分散气泡悬浮液的线性粘弹性。对于所有测试过的悬浮液,在平均动态毛细管数(⟨Cd⟩)大于一的情况下,测得的粘弹性模量(G′、G″)与杰弗里斯模型的理论预测值一致。但当⟨Cd⟩值较低时,实验 G′值超过了理论预测值。为了研究这个问题,我们考虑了悬浮液多分散性和各种 SAOS 测量假象的影响,包括气泡上升、凝聚和悬浮液微观结构随时间的变化。多分散性不可能导致观察到的偏差,因为粘弹性趋势偏离经典单模弛豫趋势的情况仅发生在气泡尺寸分布为双峰且极小气泡和极大气泡的体积分数相等的情况下;在任何其他情况下,多分散悬浮液的表现与单分散悬浮液相同,气泡半径等于体积加权平均半径。此外,气泡上升的作用很小,而 SAOS 流变光学实验表明,在我们的测量过程中,气泡大小和组织的变化可以忽略不计。低⟨Cd⟩值时的 G′偏差与气泡空间分布引起的气泡流体动力学相互作用有关。图像分析表明,在气泡体积分数较低时,较强和较长时间的预热会通过增加气泡间的平均距离来减少这些相互作用。但在密度较高的悬浮液中,这种影响可以忽略不计,因为无论采用何种预热方式,悬浮液都会显示出类似的 G′趋势。最后,根据实验数据拟合的多模式 Jeffreys 模型表明,气泡相互作用使松弛过程复杂化,引入了多种松弛模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Rheology
Journal of Rheology 物理-力学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
12.10%
发文量
100
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rheology, formerly the Transactions of The Society of Rheology, is published six times per year by The Society of Rheology, a member society of the American Institute of Physics, through AIP Publishing. It provides in-depth interdisciplinary coverage of theoretical and experimental issues drawn from industry and academia. The Journal of Rheology is published for professionals and students in chemistry, physics, engineering, material science, and mathematics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信