Optimizing exercise prescription during breast cancer rehabilitation in women: Analysis of the load–velocity relationship in the box squat exercise

David M. Díez-Fernández, Alba Esteban-Simón, Andrés Baena-Raya, David Rodríguez-Rosell, Filipe Conceição, Manuel A. Rodríguez-Pérez, Alberto Soriano-Maldonado
{"title":"Optimizing exercise prescription during breast cancer rehabilitation in women: Analysis of the load–velocity relationship in the box squat exercise","authors":"David M. Díez-Fernández,&nbsp;Alba Esteban-Simón,&nbsp;Andrés Baena-Raya,&nbsp;David Rodríguez-Rosell,&nbsp;Filipe Conceição,&nbsp;Manuel A. Rodríguez-Pérez,&nbsp;Alberto Soriano-Maldonado","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.12130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aims of this study were to assess (i) the load–velocity relationship during the box squat exercise in women survivors of breast cancer, (ii) which velocity variable (mean velocity [MV], mean propulsive velocity [MPV], or peak velocity [PV]) shows stronger relationship with the relative load (%1RM), and (iii) which regression model (linear [LA] or polynomic [PA]) provides a greater fit for predicting the velocities associated with each %1RM. Nineteen women survivors of breast cancer (age: 53.2 ± 6.9 years, weight: 70.9 ± 13.1 kg, and height: 163.5 ± 7.4 cm) completed an incremental load test up to one-repetition maximum in the box squat exercise. The MV, MPV, and the PV were measured during the concentric phase of each repetition with a linear velocity transducer. These measurements were analyzed by regression models using LA and PA. Strong correlations of MV with %1RM (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.903/0.904; the standard error of the estimate (SEE) = 0.05 m<sup>.</sup>s<sup>−1</sup> by LA/PA) and MPV (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.900; SEE = 0.06 m<sup>.</sup>s<sup>−1</sup> by LA and PA) were observed. In contrast, PV showed a weaker association with %1RM (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.704; SEE = 0.15 m<sup>.</sup>s<sup>−1</sup> by LA and PA). The MV and MPV of 1RM was 0.22 ± 0.04 m·s<sup>−1</sup>, whereas the PV at 1RM was 0.63 ± 0.18 m<sup>.</sup>s<sup>−1</sup>. These findings suggest that the use of MV to prescribe relative loads during resistance training, as well as LA and PA regression models, accurately predicted velocities for each %1RM. Assessing and prescribing resistance exercises during breast cancer rehabilitation can be facilitated through the monitoring of movement velocity.</p>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.12130","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.12130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aims of this study were to assess (i) the load–velocity relationship during the box squat exercise in women survivors of breast cancer, (ii) which velocity variable (mean velocity [MV], mean propulsive velocity [MPV], or peak velocity [PV]) shows stronger relationship with the relative load (%1RM), and (iii) which regression model (linear [LA] or polynomic [PA]) provides a greater fit for predicting the velocities associated with each %1RM. Nineteen women survivors of breast cancer (age: 53.2 ± 6.9 years, weight: 70.9 ± 13.1 kg, and height: 163.5 ± 7.4 cm) completed an incremental load test up to one-repetition maximum in the box squat exercise. The MV, MPV, and the PV were measured during the concentric phase of each repetition with a linear velocity transducer. These measurements were analyzed by regression models using LA and PA. Strong correlations of MV with %1RM (R2 = 0.903/0.904; the standard error of the estimate (SEE) = 0.05 m.s−1 by LA/PA) and MPV (R2 = 0.900; SEE = 0.06 m.s−1 by LA and PA) were observed. In contrast, PV showed a weaker association with %1RM (R2 = 0.704; SEE = 0.15 m.s−1 by LA and PA). The MV and MPV of 1RM was 0.22 ± 0.04 m·s−1, whereas the PV at 1RM was 0.63 ± 0.18 m.s−1. These findings suggest that the use of MV to prescribe relative loads during resistance training, as well as LA and PA regression models, accurately predicted velocities for each %1RM. Assessing and prescribing resistance exercises during breast cancer rehabilitation can be facilitated through the monitoring of movement velocity.

Abstract Image

优化女性乳腺癌康复期间的运动处方:箱式深蹲运动中的负荷-速度关系分析
本研究的目的是评估(i)乳腺癌女性幸存者在箱蹲运动中的负荷-速度关系,(ii)哪个速度变量(平均速度[MV]、平均推进速度[MPV]或峰值速度[PV])与相对负荷(%1RM)的关系更密切,以及(iii)哪个回归模型(线性[LA]或多项式[PA])更适合预测与每个%1RM相关的速度。19 名乳腺癌女性幸存者(年龄:53.2±6.9 岁,体重:70.9±13.1 千克,身高:163.5±7.4 厘米)完成了箱式深蹲运动中的增量负荷测试,直至一次重复最大值。在每次重复的同心阶段,使用线性速度传感器测量 MV、MPV 和 PV。这些测量值通过使用 LA 和 PA 的回归模型进行分析。观察发现,MV 与 1RM 百分比(R2 = 0.903/0.904;LA/PA 的估计标准误差(SEE)= 0.05 m.s-1)和 MPV(R2 = 0.900;LA 和 PA 的估计标准误差(SEE)= 0.06 m.s-1)密切相关。相比之下,PV 与 1%1RM 的关系较弱(R2 = 0.704;LA 和 PA 的 SEE = 0.15 m.s-1)。1RM 的 MV 和 MPV 为 0.22 ± 0.04 m-s-1,而 1RM 时的 PV 为 0.63 ± 0.18 m.s-1。这些研究结果表明,在阻力训练中使用MV来规定相对负荷,以及LA和PA回归模型,可以准确预测每个%1RM的速度。在乳腺癌康复过程中,通过监测运动速度可以帮助评估和制定阻力训练计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信