The Worker Flow at the Hive Entrance Predicts When Nest Cleaning is Intensified in Stingless Bees

IF 1.6 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY
Kedar Devkota, C. F. dos Santos, A. B. Ferreira, Júlia Terra Zuch, Binayak Prakash Mishra, B. Blochtein
{"title":"The Worker Flow at the Hive Entrance Predicts When Nest Cleaning is Intensified in Stingless Bees","authors":"Kedar Devkota, C. F. dos Santos, A. B. Ferreira, Júlia Terra Zuch, Binayak Prakash Mishra, B. Blochtein","doi":"10.1155/2024/6659234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Waste produced by living organisms is commonly disposed of as a prophylactic measure to avoid the spread of diseases and parasite infestation. For social insects, a proportion of workers is allocated to dispose the waste material outside the colony’s nest. However, most nests of social insects have a single entrance, where a high flow of individuals may create congestion, potentially compromising normal foraging activities and colony growth/health. Here, we investigated how two species of stingless bees (Tetragonisca fiebrigi and Plebeia droryana) deal with waste disposal and regular foraging activities, and the impacts of these activities on traffic flow at nest entrances. First, we compared the average traffic of bees assigned to waste removal activities. Following this, we investigated probabilities for waste removal as bee traffic increases. Then, we estimated a cutoff value to predict the likelihood that waste removal activities will be intensified over foraging trips. We found that, on average, the number of bees performing waste removal activities was lower than those undertaking foraging trips for both species. In addition, we observed that as overall bee traffic increases, the number of workers engaged in waste removal reduces or even ceases. Our models indicate that bee traffic of approximately 15 individuals/time is a cutoff score, below which, colonies invest in waste removal and above which, foraging trips are increased. It suggests that both species use the entrances of their colonies in an optimized way by adjusting which tasks should be intensified as the traffic of individuals increases.","PeriodicalId":20890,"journal":{"name":"Psyche: A Journal of Entomology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psyche: A Journal of Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/6659234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Waste produced by living organisms is commonly disposed of as a prophylactic measure to avoid the spread of diseases and parasite infestation. For social insects, a proportion of workers is allocated to dispose the waste material outside the colony’s nest. However, most nests of social insects have a single entrance, where a high flow of individuals may create congestion, potentially compromising normal foraging activities and colony growth/health. Here, we investigated how two species of stingless bees (Tetragonisca fiebrigi and Plebeia droryana) deal with waste disposal and regular foraging activities, and the impacts of these activities on traffic flow at nest entrances. First, we compared the average traffic of bees assigned to waste removal activities. Following this, we investigated probabilities for waste removal as bee traffic increases. Then, we estimated a cutoff value to predict the likelihood that waste removal activities will be intensified over foraging trips. We found that, on average, the number of bees performing waste removal activities was lower than those undertaking foraging trips for both species. In addition, we observed that as overall bee traffic increases, the number of workers engaged in waste removal reduces or even ceases. Our models indicate that bee traffic of approximately 15 individuals/time is a cutoff score, below which, colonies invest in waste removal and above which, foraging trips are increased. It suggests that both species use the entrances of their colonies in an optimized way by adjusting which tasks should be intensified as the traffic of individuals increases.
蜂巢入口处的工蜂流预测无刺蜂何时加强清巢工作
处理生物体产生的废物通常是一种预防措施,以避免疾病传播和寄生虫感染。对于社会性昆虫来说,一部分工蚁被分配到蚁巢外处理废料。然而,大多数社会性昆虫的巢只有一个入口,大量的个体流动可能会造成拥堵,从而影响正常的觅食活动和昆虫群的生长/健康。在这里,我们研究了两种无刺蜂(Tetragonisca fiebrigi和Plebeia droryana)如何处理废物和进行正常的觅食活动,以及这些活动对巢穴入口流量的影响。首先,我们比较了被分配从事废物清理活动的蜜蜂的平均流量。随后,我们研究了随着蜜蜂流量的增加,清除废物的概率。然后,我们估算了一个临界值,以预测清除废物活动比觅食活动更频繁的可能性。我们发现,平均而言,两种蜜蜂进行清除废物活动的数量都低于进行觅食活动的数量。此外,我们还观察到,随着蜜蜂总流量的增加,从事清除废物的工蜂数量减少甚至停止。我们的模型表明,蜜蜂流量约为 15 只/次是一个分界线,低于这个分界线,蜂群就会投入清除废物的活动,而高于这个分界线,觅食活动就会增加。这表明,随着个体流量的增加,这两种蜜蜂都会调整哪些任务需要加强,从而以最优化的方式使用蜂群入口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信