Exploring social determinants of health in primary care: Approaches to increase research inclusivity

IF 1.8 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Takuya Maejima MD, Junki Mizumoto MD, Gemmei Iizuka MD, PhD, Maho Haseda MD, PhD
{"title":"Exploring social determinants of health in primary care: Approaches to increase research inclusivity","authors":"Takuya Maejima MD,&nbsp;Junki Mizumoto MD,&nbsp;Gemmei Iizuka MD, PhD,&nbsp;Maho Haseda MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/jgf2.705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Research on the social determinants of health (SDH) aims to foster a healthier, more equitable society by reducing health disparities. Nonetheless, primary care researchers often face challenges in engaging marginalized populations in their studies. It is essential to explore diverse methodologies to promote inclusive research.</p><p>During the fifth annual Primary Care Research (PCR) Connect conference, dedicated to primary care research in Japan, we held a symposium to discuss strategies for enhancing inclusivity in SDH research.</p><p>Using large-scale datasets from multiple centers or municipalities offers the advantage of evaluating the subtle effects of meso- and macro-level factors on individual health and their heterogeneities. However, the exclusion of individuals because of healthcare access barriers, language barriers, absence from official databases, or unstable housing situations can introduce sampling and selection biases. Such biases may compromise the studies' validity and generalizability of those findings.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Therefore, the following studies focusing on marginalized populations highlight their potential benefits in specific contexts.</p><p>By tailoring surveys to fit the target population, researchers can gather responses from individuals typically overlooked in large-scale surveys, allowing insights into their characteristics and concerns, including their lived experiences. For instance, investigations focus on individuals residing in marginalized communities, such as street dwellers living around train stations<span><sup>2</sup></span> or residents in impoverished neighborhoods.<span><sup>3</sup></span> Collaboration with local authorities ensures access to this data, essential for these studies. Furthermore, researchers should endeavor to mitigate health disparities by implementing interventions.</p><p>Qualitative research offers researchers a window into the lived experiences, thoughts, and emotions of socially marginalized individuals. For instance, qualitative inquiry holds the potential to unveil the barriers perceived by women with a history of substance use, transgender individuals, or youth contemplating suicide,<span><sup>4</sup></span> during their interactions within primary care settings.</p><p>Case reports can elucidate the detailed experiences of patients facing complex social adversities.<span><sup>5</sup></span> Reports concentrating on SDH equip primary care professionals with critical insights for managing SDH-related challenges in daily practice. Maintaining patient confidentiality is a critical responsibility for all reporters.</p><p>Although we did not refer to a systematic review or scoping review in the conference, these reviews will synthesize the available evidence and identify evidence gaps.</p><p>In conclusion, research on SDH can employ diverse methodologies to illuminate the experiences of marginalized populations. Primary care professionals, often the initial point of contact for patients facing social challenges, play a pivotal role in leveraging their position to amplify the voices of such individuals and engage in research focused on their health and well-being.</p><p>The authors have stated explicitly that there are no conflicts of interest in connection with this article.</p>","PeriodicalId":51861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General and Family Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgf2.705","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General and Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgf2.705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on the social determinants of health (SDH) aims to foster a healthier, more equitable society by reducing health disparities. Nonetheless, primary care researchers often face challenges in engaging marginalized populations in their studies. It is essential to explore diverse methodologies to promote inclusive research.

During the fifth annual Primary Care Research (PCR) Connect conference, dedicated to primary care research in Japan, we held a symposium to discuss strategies for enhancing inclusivity in SDH research.

Using large-scale datasets from multiple centers or municipalities offers the advantage of evaluating the subtle effects of meso- and macro-level factors on individual health and their heterogeneities. However, the exclusion of individuals because of healthcare access barriers, language barriers, absence from official databases, or unstable housing situations can introduce sampling and selection biases. Such biases may compromise the studies' validity and generalizability of those findings.1 Therefore, the following studies focusing on marginalized populations highlight their potential benefits in specific contexts.

By tailoring surveys to fit the target population, researchers can gather responses from individuals typically overlooked in large-scale surveys, allowing insights into their characteristics and concerns, including their lived experiences. For instance, investigations focus on individuals residing in marginalized communities, such as street dwellers living around train stations2 or residents in impoverished neighborhoods.3 Collaboration with local authorities ensures access to this data, essential for these studies. Furthermore, researchers should endeavor to mitigate health disparities by implementing interventions.

Qualitative research offers researchers a window into the lived experiences, thoughts, and emotions of socially marginalized individuals. For instance, qualitative inquiry holds the potential to unveil the barriers perceived by women with a history of substance use, transgender individuals, or youth contemplating suicide,4 during their interactions within primary care settings.

Case reports can elucidate the detailed experiences of patients facing complex social adversities.5 Reports concentrating on SDH equip primary care professionals with critical insights for managing SDH-related challenges in daily practice. Maintaining patient confidentiality is a critical responsibility for all reporters.

Although we did not refer to a systematic review or scoping review in the conference, these reviews will synthesize the available evidence and identify evidence gaps.

In conclusion, research on SDH can employ diverse methodologies to illuminate the experiences of marginalized populations. Primary care professionals, often the initial point of contact for patients facing social challenges, play a pivotal role in leveraging their position to amplify the voices of such individuals and engage in research focused on their health and well-being.

The authors have stated explicitly that there are no conflicts of interest in connection with this article.

探索初级保健中健康的社会决定因素:提高研究包容性的方法
对健康的社会决定因素(SDH)进行研究的目的是通过缩小健康差距,促进建立一个更健康、更公平的社会。然而,初级保健研究人员在让边缘化人群参与研究时常常面临挑战。在第五届日本初级医疗研究(PCR)联接年会期间,我们举办了一场研讨会,讨论提高 SDH 研究包容性的策略。使用来自多个中心或城市的大规模数据集具有评估中观和宏观因素对个人健康的微妙影响及其异质性的优势。然而,由于医疗保健获取障碍、语言障碍、官方数据库缺失或住房状况不稳定等原因而将个人排除在外,可能会带来抽样和选择偏差。1 因此,以下以边缘化人群为重点的研究强调了其在特定情况下的潜在益处。通过定制适合目标人群的调查,研究人员可以收集到在大规模调查中通常被忽视的个人的回答,从而深入了解他们的特点和关注点,包括他们的生活经历。例如,调查的重点是居住在边缘化社区的个人,如居住在火车站周围的街头流浪者2 或贫困社区的居民3 。此外,研究人员应努力通过实施干预措施来减少健康差异。定性研究为研究人员提供了一个了解社会边缘化个人的生活经历、思想和情感的窗口。例如,定性调查有可能揭示有药物使用史的妇女、变性人或酝酿自杀的青少年4 在初级保健环境中互动时所感受到的障碍。案例报告可以阐明面临复杂社会逆境的患者的详细经历。总之,有关 SDH 的研究可以采用多种方法来阐明边缘化人群的经历。初级保健专业人员往往是面临社会挑战的患者的最初接触点,他们在利用自身地位放大这些人的声音并参与关注其健康和福祉的研究方面发挥着关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of General and Family Medicine
Journal of General and Family Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
79
审稿时长
48 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信