Differential Culprit Plaque Morphology in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Comparison Between Very Young Patients (<=35 Years) and Older Counterparts Using Optical Coherence Tomography

G. Chaudhary, B. Gupta, Shubhajeet Roy, S. Chandra, Akhil Sharma, A. Pradhan, M. Bhandari, P. Vishwakarma, R. Sethi, S. Dwivedi, Vinit Baliyan, Prachi Sharma, Vikash Jaiswal, Abhishek Singh, A. Shukla, Sajina Shrestha, Alessia Gimelli
{"title":"Differential Culprit Plaque Morphology in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Comparison Between Very Young Patients (<=35 Years) and Older Counterparts Using Optical Coherence Tomography","authors":"G. Chaudhary, B. Gupta, Shubhajeet Roy, S. Chandra, Akhil Sharma, A. Pradhan, M. Bhandari, P. Vishwakarma, R. Sethi, S. Dwivedi, Vinit Baliyan, Prachi Sharma, Vikash Jaiswal, Abhishek Singh, A. Shukla, Sajina Shrestha, Alessia Gimelli","doi":"10.1093/ehjimp/qyae046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Underlying mechanisms responsible for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in young patients compared to older counterparts are yet to be explored with optical coherence tomography (OCT).\n \n \n \n To explore underlying mechanisms of ACS in ≤35 (very young) and >35-year-old (older counterparts) ACS patients using OCT.\n \n \n \n This was a prospective, single-center, investigational study. Patients were divided into groups according to age (≤35 and >35 years) and further subdivided according to the underlying mechanism i.e. plaque rupture (PR) and plaque erosion (PE).\n \n \n \n A total of 93 patients were analyzed. Thin cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) was significantly higher among older counterparts than very young patients for both PR (80.0% vs. 31.8%, p=0.002) and PE (66.7% vs. 6.3%, p<0.001) groups. Micro-channels were also significantly more prevalent among older than very young patients for both PR (65.0% vs. 18.2%, p=0.004) and PE groups (55.6% vs.12.5%, p=0.013). Macrophages were significantly higher in older than very young patients for both PR (25.0% vs. 0%, p=0.018) and PE (44.4% vs. 0%, p=0.003) groups. In contrast, fibrous cap thickness was greater in very young than older patients for both PR (105.71±48.02 µm vs. 58.00±15.76 µm, p<0.001) and PE (126.67±48.22 µm vs. 54.38±24.21 µm, p<0.001) groups. Intimal thickness was greater in older than very young patients for both PR (728.00±313.92 µm vs. 342.27±142.02 µm, p<0.001) and PE (672.78±334.57 µm vs. 295.00±99.60 µm, p<0.001) groups.\n \n \n \n Frequency of TCFA, micro-channels, macrophages, and intimal thickness was significantly higher in older ACS patients compared to very young patients. However, fibrous cap thickness was significantly greater in very young ACS patients compared to older patients.\n","PeriodicalId":508944,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Imaging Methods and Practice","volume":"119 26","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Imaging Methods and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyae046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Underlying mechanisms responsible for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in young patients compared to older counterparts are yet to be explored with optical coherence tomography (OCT). To explore underlying mechanisms of ACS in ≤35 (very young) and >35-year-old (older counterparts) ACS patients using OCT. This was a prospective, single-center, investigational study. Patients were divided into groups according to age (≤35 and >35 years) and further subdivided according to the underlying mechanism i.e. plaque rupture (PR) and plaque erosion (PE). A total of 93 patients were analyzed. Thin cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) was significantly higher among older counterparts than very young patients for both PR (80.0% vs. 31.8%, p=0.002) and PE (66.7% vs. 6.3%, p<0.001) groups. Micro-channels were also significantly more prevalent among older than very young patients for both PR (65.0% vs. 18.2%, p=0.004) and PE groups (55.6% vs.12.5%, p=0.013). Macrophages were significantly higher in older than very young patients for both PR (25.0% vs. 0%, p=0.018) and PE (44.4% vs. 0%, p=0.003) groups. In contrast, fibrous cap thickness was greater in very young than older patients for both PR (105.71±48.02 µm vs. 58.00±15.76 µm, p<0.001) and PE (126.67±48.22 µm vs. 54.38±24.21 µm, p<0.001) groups. Intimal thickness was greater in older than very young patients for both PR (728.00±313.92 µm vs. 342.27±142.02 µm, p<0.001) and PE (672.78±334.57 µm vs. 295.00±99.60 µm, p<0.001) groups. Frequency of TCFA, micro-channels, macrophages, and intimal thickness was significantly higher in older ACS patients compared to very young patients. However, fibrous cap thickness was significantly greater in very young ACS patients compared to older patients.
急性冠状动脉综合征的致病斑块形态差异:使用光学相干断层扫描对非常年轻的患者(<=35 岁)和年龄较大的患者进行比较
与老年患者相比,年轻患者的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)发病机制尚待通过光学相干断层扫描(OCT)进行研究。 利用光学相干断层扫描探究≤35岁(非常年轻)和>35岁(年龄较大)急性冠状动脉综合征患者的潜在发病机制。 这是一项前瞻性、单中心调查研究。根据年龄将患者分为两组(≤35 岁和大于 35 岁),并根据潜在机制(即斑块破裂(PR)和斑块侵蚀(PE))进一步细分。 共对 93 名患者进行了分析。在 PR 组(80.0% 对 31.8%,P=0.002)和 PE 组(66.7% 对 6.3%,P<0.001)中,老年患者的薄盖纤维血管瘤(TCFA)明显高于年轻患者。在 PR 组(65.0% vs. 18.2%,p=0.004)和 PE 组(55.6% vs. 12.5%,p=0.013)中,老年患者的微通道发生率也明显高于年轻患者。在 PR 组(25.0% vs. 0%,p=0.018)和 PE 组(44.4% vs. 0%,p=0.003)中,年龄较大患者的巨噬细胞明显高于年龄较小的患者。相反,在 PR 组(105.71±48.02 µm vs. 58.00±15.76 µm,p<0.001)和 PE 组(126.67±48.22 µm vs. 54.38±24.21 µm,p<0.001)中,非常年轻的患者的纤维帽厚度大于年龄较大的患者。在 PR 组(728.00±313.92 µm vs. 342.27±142.02 µm,p<0.001)和 PE 组(672.78±334.57 µm vs. 295.00±99.60 µm,p<0.001),年龄较大的患者内膜厚度大于年龄较小的患者。 与非常年轻的患者相比,年龄较大的 ACS 患者 TCFA、微通道、巨噬细胞和内膜厚度的频率明显较高。然而,与老年患者相比,非常年轻的 ACS 患者的纤维帽厚度明显更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信