Contestation, negotiation, and experimentation: The liminality of land administration platforms in Kenya

F. I. Hoefsloot, C. Gateri
{"title":"Contestation, negotiation, and experimentation: The liminality of land administration platforms in Kenya","authors":"F. I. Hoefsloot, C. Gateri","doi":"10.1177/02637758241254943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines diverse infrastructural interventions in the making of Ardhisasa, the Kenyan state’s digital land information management platform, as a space of contestation, negotiation, and experimentation. We analyse the platformisation of governance through theories on liminality to explain the agency of various actors in shaping the digital state. We particularly zoom into the influence of two actors: the private actors in the land sector and the civil society organisations representing informalised residents, and how they exercise agency in the development of Ardhisasa. Drawing on interviews with state and non-state actors, secondary literature, and extensive experience within Kenya’s land administration system, we trace the overt and covert exercise of power in the platformisation of land administration of Nairobi. Our central thesis is that, despite its progressive development, Ardhisasa follows the tradition of a long line of large-scale infrastructural or developmental projects that rarely deliver on their promise for improvement but rather further entrench marginalised groups due to its exclusion of the already existing, albeit informalised, land administration and transaction practices that meet the needs of the urban poor. We argue that Ardhisasa’s perpetual state of becoming leads to the spatialisation of liminality itself.","PeriodicalId":504516,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Planning D: Society and Space","volume":"1 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Planning D: Society and Space","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02637758241254943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines diverse infrastructural interventions in the making of Ardhisasa, the Kenyan state’s digital land information management platform, as a space of contestation, negotiation, and experimentation. We analyse the platformisation of governance through theories on liminality to explain the agency of various actors in shaping the digital state. We particularly zoom into the influence of two actors: the private actors in the land sector and the civil society organisations representing informalised residents, and how they exercise agency in the development of Ardhisasa. Drawing on interviews with state and non-state actors, secondary literature, and extensive experience within Kenya’s land administration system, we trace the overt and covert exercise of power in the platformisation of land administration of Nairobi. Our central thesis is that, despite its progressive development, Ardhisasa follows the tradition of a long line of large-scale infrastructural or developmental projects that rarely deliver on their promise for improvement but rather further entrench marginalised groups due to its exclusion of the already existing, albeit informalised, land administration and transaction practices that meet the needs of the urban poor. We argue that Ardhisasa’s perpetual state of becoming leads to the spatialisation of liminality itself.
竞争、谈判和实验:肯尼亚土地管理平台的边缘性
本文探讨了在肯尼亚国家数字土地信息管理平台 Ardhisasa 制作过程中的各种基础设施干预,将其视为一个竞争、协商和实验的空间。我们通过边缘性理论分析了治理的平台化,以解释不同参与者在塑造数字国家过程中的作用。我们特别放大了两个参与者的影响:土地部门的私人参与者和代表非正式化居民的民间组织,以及他们如何在开发 Ardhisasa 的过程中行使代理权。通过对国家和非国家行为者的访谈、二手文献以及在肯尼亚土地管理系统中的丰富经验,我们追溯了在内罗毕土地管理平台化过程中权力的公开和隐蔽行使。我们的中心论点是,尽管 Ardhisasa 在逐步发展,但它沿袭了大型基础设施或发展项目的传统,这些项目很少能兑现其改善承诺,反而会进一步巩固边缘化群体,因为它排除了现有的、尽管是非正式的、但能满足城市贫民需求的土地管理和交易实践。我们认为,阿迪萨萨的永久化状态导致了边缘性本身的空间化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信