Effects of digital and non-digital parental distraction on parent-child interaction and communication

Souhir Chamam, Alexia Forcella, Nadia Musio, Florence Quinodoz, Nevena Dimitrova
{"title":"Effects of digital and non-digital parental distraction on parent-child interaction and communication","authors":"Souhir Chamam, Alexia Forcella, Nadia Musio, Florence Quinodoz, Nevena Dimitrova","doi":"10.3389/frcha.2024.1330331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technoference, namely parental screen use in the presence of a child, is a widespread phenomenon that has negative effects on parent-child interaction and communication. When parents use screens around their children there are fewer interactions and parents are less contingent and responsive to the child. Additionally, children show more negative behaviors, such as whining, frustration, and outbursts. Communication is also affected—parents speak and gesture less towards their children and, in turn, children are less likely to develop their language abilities. It remains unclear, however, if parental distraction due to screen use affects parent-child interaction and communication more negatively compared to non-digital parental distraction. Fifty-two parent-child dyads (mean child age = 22 months, range 12–36 months) first played for 5 min (Time 1); then (Time 2), the parent was asked to fill out a questionnaire on a tablet (screen condition), on a printed form (paper-pen condition) or was not interrupted (control condition). Interactive quality was assessed at Time 1 and Time 2 using the Coding Interactive Behavior scale. Communication was assessed by coding the number of word tokens and types during Time 1 and Time 2; child gestures were also coded. Results revealed that when parents were distracted—either by the paper-pen or the screen questionnaire—the quality of the interaction significantly deteriorated (ps ≤ .01) and the quantity of parental communication significantly declined (ps ≤ .012). Importantly, the nature of the distraction did not matter: there were no significant differences between the paper-pen and the screen distraction conditions across Time 2 (ps ≥ .59). Findings suggest that parental distraction matters for the quality of interaction and the amount of communicative bids, independently on whether parents were distracted by a digital or non-digital activity. These findings likely relate to complex factors related to young children's experiences and habits with parental screen use.","PeriodicalId":73074,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry","volume":"38 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frcha.2024.1330331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Technoference, namely parental screen use in the presence of a child, is a widespread phenomenon that has negative effects on parent-child interaction and communication. When parents use screens around their children there are fewer interactions and parents are less contingent and responsive to the child. Additionally, children show more negative behaviors, such as whining, frustration, and outbursts. Communication is also affected—parents speak and gesture less towards their children and, in turn, children are less likely to develop their language abilities. It remains unclear, however, if parental distraction due to screen use affects parent-child interaction and communication more negatively compared to non-digital parental distraction. Fifty-two parent-child dyads (mean child age = 22 months, range 12–36 months) first played for 5 min (Time 1); then (Time 2), the parent was asked to fill out a questionnaire on a tablet (screen condition), on a printed form (paper-pen condition) or was not interrupted (control condition). Interactive quality was assessed at Time 1 and Time 2 using the Coding Interactive Behavior scale. Communication was assessed by coding the number of word tokens and types during Time 1 and Time 2; child gestures were also coded. Results revealed that when parents were distracted—either by the paper-pen or the screen questionnaire—the quality of the interaction significantly deteriorated (ps ≤ .01) and the quantity of parental communication significantly declined (ps ≤ .012). Importantly, the nature of the distraction did not matter: there were no significant differences between the paper-pen and the screen distraction conditions across Time 2 (ps ≥ .59). Findings suggest that parental distraction matters for the quality of interaction and the amount of communicative bids, independently on whether parents were distracted by a digital or non-digital activity. These findings likely relate to complex factors related to young children's experiences and habits with parental screen use.
数字和非数字父母分心对亲子互动和交流的影响
技术干预(Technoference),即父母在孩子面前使用屏幕,是一种普遍现象,会对亲子互动和交流产生负面影响。当父母在孩子身边使用屏幕时,互动就会减少,父母对孩子的应变和回应能力也会降低。此外,孩子会表现出更多的负面行为,如抱怨、沮丧和爆发。交流也会受到影响--父母对孩子说话和做手势的次数减少,反过来,孩子的语言能力也会受到影响。然而,与非数码父母分心相比,父母因使用屏幕而分心是否会对亲子互动和交流产生更消极的影响,目前仍不清楚。52对亲子(平均年龄为22个月,年龄范围为12-36个月)首先玩了5分钟(时间1);然后(时间2),家长被要求在平板电脑(屏幕条件)、打印表格(纸笔条件)上填写问卷,或者不被打断(对照条件)。在时间 1 和时间 2,使用互动行为编码量表对互动质量进行评估。在时间 1 和时间 2 中,通过编码词块数量和类型来评估交流情况;还对儿童的手势进行了编码。结果显示,当父母分心时--无论是纸笔还是屏幕问卷--互动的质量明显下降(ps ≤ .01),父母交流的数量明显减少(ps ≤ .012)。重要的是,分心的性质并不重要:在时间 2 中,纸笔和屏幕分心条件之间没有明显差异(ps ≥ .59)。研究结果表明,父母的分心会影响互动的质量和交流的数量,这与父母分心于数字活动还是非数字活动无关。这些发现可能与幼儿使用父母屏幕的经历和习惯等复杂因素有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信