THE STUDY OF EFFECT PROBIOTIC IN ACNE AND ROSACEA : A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Novitafalen, Nathania Christika, Henyta, Ririn Azhari, Astrid Ananda, Afdila Syarfina
{"title":"THE STUDY OF EFFECT PROBIOTIC IN ACNE AND ROSACEA : A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW","authors":"Novitafalen, Nathania Christika, Henyta, Ririn Azhari, Astrid Ananda, Afdila Syarfina","doi":"10.61841/ftca7b80","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Alternative remedies have long been utilized by patients to treat skin diseases in addition to or instead of traditional medical care. Research on the relationship between probiotics, the skin microbiota, and inflammatory dermatoses is only getting started.\nAims : This systematic review is to review the association of probiotic and its effect in acne and rosacea.\nMethods: This study demonstrated compliance with all requirements by means of a comparison with the standards established by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020. Thus, the specialists were able to guarantee that the research was as current as feasible. Publications released between 2014 and 2024 were considered for this search strategy. This was accomplished by utilizing a number of distinct online reference sites, including Pubmed, ScienceDirect, and SagePub. It was determined that reviews, previously published works, and partially completed works would not be included. \nResult: In the PubMed database, the results of our search brought up 19 articles, whereas the results of our search on SCIENCE DIRECT brought up 166 articles, our search on SAGEPUB brought up 10 articles. The results of the search conducted for the last year of 2014 yielded a total 18 articles for PubMed, 122 articles for SCIENCE DIRECT and 7 articles for SAGEPUB. In the end, we compiled a total of  6 papers, 3 of which came from PubMed, 2 of which came from SCIENCE DIRECT and 1 of which came from SAGEPUB. We included six research that met the criteria.\nConclusion: In summary, manyof the studies that are currently available in the literature only involved a limited number of patients, did not state which species or dosage of probiotics were utilized, or did not run their trials long enough to fully assess the effects of probiotics on the microbiome of the skin and stomach.","PeriodicalId":507661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Research in Medical and Health Science (ISSN 2208-2425)","volume":"20 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Research in Medical and Health Science (ISSN 2208-2425)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61841/ftca7b80","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Alternative remedies have long been utilized by patients to treat skin diseases in addition to or instead of traditional medical care. Research on the relationship between probiotics, the skin microbiota, and inflammatory dermatoses is only getting started. Aims : This systematic review is to review the association of probiotic and its effect in acne and rosacea. Methods: This study demonstrated compliance with all requirements by means of a comparison with the standards established by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020. Thus, the specialists were able to guarantee that the research was as current as feasible. Publications released between 2014 and 2024 were considered for this search strategy. This was accomplished by utilizing a number of distinct online reference sites, including Pubmed, ScienceDirect, and SagePub. It was determined that reviews, previously published works, and partially completed works would not be included. Result: In the PubMed database, the results of our search brought up 19 articles, whereas the results of our search on SCIENCE DIRECT brought up 166 articles, our search on SAGEPUB brought up 10 articles. The results of the search conducted for the last year of 2014 yielded a total 18 articles for PubMed, 122 articles for SCIENCE DIRECT and 7 articles for SAGEPUB. In the end, we compiled a total of  6 papers, 3 of which came from PubMed, 2 of which came from SCIENCE DIRECT and 1 of which came from SAGEPUB. We included six research that met the criteria. Conclusion: In summary, manyof the studies that are currently available in the literature only involved a limited number of patients, did not state which species or dosage of probiotics were utilized, or did not run their trials long enough to fully assess the effects of probiotics on the microbiome of the skin and stomach.
研究益生菌对痤疮和酒渣鼻的影响:系统综述
背景:长期以来,患者利用替代疗法来治疗皮肤病,作为传统医疗的补充或替代。关于益生菌、皮肤微生物群和炎症性皮肤病之间关系的研究才刚刚起步:本系统综述旨在回顾益生菌与痤疮和酒渣鼻之间的关系及其对痤疮和酒渣鼻的影响:本研究通过与《2020 年系统性综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》(PRISMA)规定的标准进行比较,证明符合所有要求。因此,专家们能够保证研究的时效性。本检索策略考虑了 2014 年至 2024 年间发布的出版物。为此,我们使用了多个不同的在线参考网站,包括 Pubmed、ScienceDirect 和 SagePub。综述、以前发表的作品和部分完成的作品将不包括在内。结果在 PubMed 数据库中,我们的搜索结果为 19 篇文章,而在 SCIENCE DIRECT 上的搜索结果为 166 篇文章,在 SAGEPUB 上的搜索结果为 10 篇文章。2014 年最后一年的搜索结果显示,PubMed 共搜索到 18 篇文章,SCIENCE DIRECT 共搜索到 122 篇文章,SAGEPUB 共搜索到 7 篇文章。最后,我们共整理出 6 篇论文,其中 3 篇来自 PubMed,2 篇来自 SCIENCE DIRECT,1 篇来自 SAGEPUB。我们收录了六项符合标准的研究:总之,目前文献中的许多研究只涉及有限数量的患者,没有说明使用的益生菌种类或剂量,或者试验时间不够长,无法全面评估益生菌对皮肤和胃部微生物群的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信