{"title":"Institutional Analysis of Economy: Qualitative and Quantitative Research and\n Methods","authors":"V. Tambovtsev","doi":"10.52342/2587-7666vte_2024_2_45_55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to a comparative analysis of two alternative approaches to\n the study of economic institutions - qualitative and quantitative research\n methodologies. Analysis of the first shows that the task is to identify the meanings\n that people attach to their actions, while the task of the second is to identify\n regularities of connections between institutions and various aspects of behavior.\n Institutional analysis conducted on the basis of qualitative methodology is based on\n vague definitions of institutions that lack operationalization, while quantitative\n studies of institutions rely on strict operational definitions. The article outlines the\n procedures for both qualitative and quantitative research on institutions, the first of\n which involves obtaining data primarily through interviewing informants, and the second,\n primarily through observation of behavior. Accordingly, the result of a qualitative\n research is metis - local experiential knowledge possessed by members of a certain\n community, while the result of a quantitative study is a generalized knowledge of\n regularities expressed by confirmed hypotheses. The obtained comparison results can\n serve as information for researchers to select a methodology for studying economic\n institutions.","PeriodicalId":518543,"journal":{"name":"Issues of Economic Theory","volume":"62 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues of Economic Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52342/2587-7666vte_2024_2_45_55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article is devoted to a comparative analysis of two alternative approaches to
the study of economic institutions - qualitative and quantitative research
methodologies. Analysis of the first shows that the task is to identify the meanings
that people attach to their actions, while the task of the second is to identify
regularities of connections between institutions and various aspects of behavior.
Institutional analysis conducted on the basis of qualitative methodology is based on
vague definitions of institutions that lack operationalization, while quantitative
studies of institutions rely on strict operational definitions. The article outlines the
procedures for both qualitative and quantitative research on institutions, the first of
which involves obtaining data primarily through interviewing informants, and the second,
primarily through observation of behavior. Accordingly, the result of a qualitative
research is metis - local experiential knowledge possessed by members of a certain
community, while the result of a quantitative study is a generalized knowledge of
regularities expressed by confirmed hypotheses. The obtained comparison results can
serve as information for researchers to select a methodology for studying economic
institutions.