{"title":"Investigation into helmet–head shock wave interactions at low overpressures through free-field blasts and schlieren imagery","authors":"C. J. H. Thomas, C. E. Johnson","doi":"10.1007/s00193-024-01167-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Brain injuries in warfighters due to low-level blasts, even while wearing a helmet, are common. Understanding how the form of a shock wave changes when impacting a head donning a helmet may present solutions to reducing shock loading on the head, thereby reducing the prevalence of blast-induced traumatic brain injury. A manikin with PCB piezoelectric transducers throughout the head was exposed to low-pressure free-field blasts using an RDX-based explosive charge designed to output a side-on overpressure of 4 pounds per square inch (psi) [27.5 kilopascals (kPa)] with and without a helmet. Orientations of 0, 45, 90, 135, and 180 degrees were evaluated to observe changes in overpressure versus time (<i>p</i>(<i>t</i>)) waveforms. The waveforms were compared to schlieren imagery in which a shock wave impacted 3D-printed silhouettes of a warfighter donning a helmet, showing shock wave flow under the helmet at 0-, 90-, and 180-degree orientations. It was found that trapped shock waves under the helmet create regions of high overpressure and increase the duration of exposure, resulting in higher impulses imparted onto the head. While wearing a helmet, the 90-degree orientation resulted in the greatest reduction in overall peak overpressure, with an 8% decrease compared to the 0-degree orientation. In contrast, the 180-degree orientation led to an increase by 30%. For impulse, the 90-degree orientation showed the greatest reduction, with a decrease of 21%. The 0-degree orientation had the highest overall impulse among all orientations when wearing a helmet.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":775,"journal":{"name":"Shock Waves","volume":"34 4","pages":"399 - 412"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shock Waves","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00193-024-01167-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Brain injuries in warfighters due to low-level blasts, even while wearing a helmet, are common. Understanding how the form of a shock wave changes when impacting a head donning a helmet may present solutions to reducing shock loading on the head, thereby reducing the prevalence of blast-induced traumatic brain injury. A manikin with PCB piezoelectric transducers throughout the head was exposed to low-pressure free-field blasts using an RDX-based explosive charge designed to output a side-on overpressure of 4 pounds per square inch (psi) [27.5 kilopascals (kPa)] with and without a helmet. Orientations of 0, 45, 90, 135, and 180 degrees were evaluated to observe changes in overpressure versus time (p(t)) waveforms. The waveforms were compared to schlieren imagery in which a shock wave impacted 3D-printed silhouettes of a warfighter donning a helmet, showing shock wave flow under the helmet at 0-, 90-, and 180-degree orientations. It was found that trapped shock waves under the helmet create regions of high overpressure and increase the duration of exposure, resulting in higher impulses imparted onto the head. While wearing a helmet, the 90-degree orientation resulted in the greatest reduction in overall peak overpressure, with an 8% decrease compared to the 0-degree orientation. In contrast, the 180-degree orientation led to an increase by 30%. For impulse, the 90-degree orientation showed the greatest reduction, with a decrease of 21%. The 0-degree orientation had the highest overall impulse among all orientations when wearing a helmet.
期刊介绍:
Shock Waves provides a forum for presenting and discussing new results in all fields where shock and detonation phenomena play a role. The journal addresses physicists, engineers and applied mathematicians working on theoretical, experimental or numerical issues, including diagnostics and flow visualization.
The research fields considered include, but are not limited to, aero- and gas dynamics, acoustics, physical chemistry, condensed matter and plasmas, with applications encompassing materials sciences, space sciences, geosciences, life sciences and medicine.
Of particular interest are contributions which provide insights into fundamental aspects of the techniques that are relevant to more than one specific research community.
The journal publishes scholarly research papers, invited review articles and short notes, as well as comments on papers already published in this journal. Occasionally concise meeting reports of interest to the Shock Waves community are published.